Technologic Advances in Aural Rehabilitation: Applications and Innovative Methods of Service Delivery

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 101-111

  Sweetow, Robert W ^a   Sabes, Jennifer Henderson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

adult hearing loss; aural rehabilitation; humans; psychology; treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE;

AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; AURAL REHABILITATION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELDERLY CARE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AMPHETAMINE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SOFTWARE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34347394569     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: 19405588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1084713807301321     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Schow R Balsara N Smedley T Whitcomb C. Aural rehabilitation by ASHA audiologists. Am J Audiol. 1993;2: 28–37.
2. Sweetow R Palmer CV. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16: 494–504.
3. Moore DR Amitay S Vavasour E Irwin A. Optimising auditory learning for variable training stimuli. Abstract presented at the 29th Midwinter Meeting Association of Research in Otolaryngology. Baltimore, Md; 2006.
4. Fu QJ Galvin J Wang X Nogaki G. Moderate auditory training can improve speech performance of adult cochlear implant patients. Acoust Res Lett Online. 2005;6: 106–111.
5. Stacey PC Summerfield AQ. Auditory-perceptual training using a simulation of a cochlear implant system: a controlled study. In: Hazan V Iverson P eds. ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception (PSP2005). Senate House, London, UK; 2005: 143–145.
6. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4 suppl 2): 9–24.
7. Chisolm TH Willott JF Lister JJ. The aging auditory system: anatomic and physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(suppl 2): 3–10.
8. Schneider BA Daneman M Murphy DR. Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing? Psychol Aging. 2005;20: 261–271.
9. Divenyi PL Stark PB Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118: 1089–1100.
10. Sweetow RW Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17: 538–558.
11. Moore DR Amitay S. Auditory training: rules and applications. Semin Hear. 2007;28: 99–109.
12. Orabi AA Mawman D Al-Zoubi F Saeed SR Ramsden RT. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31: 116–122.
13. Schum RL Sivan AB. Verbal abilities in healthy elderly adults. Appl Neuropsychol 1997;4: 130–134.
14. Wingfield A. Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7: 175–182.
15. Pichora-Fuller MK. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(suppl 2): 26–32.
16. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4 suppl 2): 9–24.
17. Boothroyd A. CASPER, computer-assisted speech-perception evaluation and training. Proceeding of the 10th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Society of North America. Washington, DC. Association for Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology; 1987: 734–736.
18. De Filippo CL Scott BL. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;63: 1186–1192.
19. Dempsey JJ Levitt H Josephson J Porrazzo J. Computer-assisted tracking simulation (CATS). J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92: 701–710.
20. Gnosspelius J Spens K-E. A computer-based speech tracking procedure. STL-QPRS. 1992;1: 131–137.
21. Tyler RS Gantz BJ Parkinson AJ Woodworth GG Lowder MW Parkinson WS. Initial comparison between the Clarion, Nucleus and Ineraid cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;52: 274–278.
22. Fu QJ Shannon RV Galvin JJ 3rd. Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112: 1664–1674.
23. Dawson PW Clark GM. Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 1997;18: 488–501.
24. Busby PA Roberts SA Tong YC Clark GM. Results of speech perception and speech production training for three prelingually deaf patients using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Br J Audiol. 1991;25: 291–302.
25. Kochkin S. Hearing loss population tops 31 million people. Hear Rev. 2005;12: 16–29.
26. Gordon-Salant S Fitzgibbons PJ. Comparing recognition of distorted speech using an equivalent signal-to-noise ratio index. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38: 706–713.
27. Pichora-Fuller MK Schneider BA Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;97: 593–608.
28. Dubno JR Dirks DD Morgan DE. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;76: 87–96.
29. Murphy DR Daneman M Schneider BA. Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychol Aging. 2006;21: 49–61.
30. Mahncke HW Connor BB Appelman J et al., Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 12523–12528.
31. Ball K Berch DB Helmers KF et al., Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288: 2271–2281.
32. Tun PA Wingfield A. One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999;54: P317–P327.
33. Tobey EA Devous MD Buckley K Overson G Harris T Ringe W Martinez-Verhoff J. Pharmacological enhancement of aural habilitation in adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2005;26(4 suppl): 45S–56S.
34. Watson CS. Time course of auditory perceptual learning. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980;89: 96–102.
35. Chisolm TH Abrams HB McArdle R. Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear. 2004;25: 464–477.
36. Wayner DS. Aural rehabilitation adds value, lifts satisfaction, cuts returns. Hear J. 2005;12: 30–38.