Pharmacological enhancement of aural habilitation in adult cochlear implant users

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 26, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Tobey, Emily A ^a,c,d   Devous Sr , Michael D ^b   Buckley, Kristi ^a   Overson, Gary ^a   Harris, Thomas ^b   Ringe, Wendy ^b   Martinez Verhoff, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Callier Advanced Hearing Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE;

EID: 23644458596     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200508001-00007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Bao, S., Chan, V. T., Merzenich, M. M. (2001). Cortical remodelling induced by activity of ventral tegmental dopamine neurons. Nature, 412, 79-83.
2. Boyeson, M. G., & Feeney, D. M. (1990). Intraventricular norepinephrine facilitates motor recovery following sensorimotor cortex injury. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 35, 497-501.
3. Clopton, B. M., Silverman, M. S., Webster, D. B., Webster, M., Neural responses to morphological, syntactic, and semantic properties of single words: an fMRI study.
4. Constable, R. T., Pugh, K. R., Berroya, E., Mencl, W. E., Westerveld, M., Ni, W., Shankweiler, D., Guenther, F. H., Nieto-Castanon, A., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (1978). Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps. Exp Brain Res, 32, 39-47.
5. Crisostomo, E. A., Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., Dawson, D. V., & Davis, J. N. (1988). Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients. Ann Neurol, 23, 94-97.
6. De Filippo, C. L., & Scott, B. L. (1978). A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 1186-1192.
7. Delanoy, R. L., Tucci, D. L., Gold, P. E. (1983). Amphetamine effects on long term potentiation in dentate granule cells. Pharmacol Biochem Behavior, 18, 137-139.
8. Dietrich, W. D., Alonso, O., Busto, R., Watson, B. D., Loor, Y., & Ginsberg, M. D. (1990). Influence of amphetamine treatment on somatosensory function of the normal and infarcted rat brain. Stroke, 21, III147-III150.
9. Dinse H.R., Ragert, P., Pleger, B., Schwenkreis, P., Tegenthoff, M. (2003). Pharmacological Modulation of Perceptual Learning and Associated Cortical Reorganization. Science, 301, 91-94.
10. Feeney, D. M., Gonzalez, A., & Law, W. A. (1982). Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science, 217, 855-857.
11. Feeney, D. M., & Hovda, D. A. (1985). Reinstatement of binocular depth perception by amphetamine and visual experience after visual cortex ablation. Brain Res, 342, 352-356.
12. Friston, K. (1994). Statistical parametric mapping. In R.W.E.H-.M.E.e.al/Thatcher (Ed.), Functional neuroimaging: Technical foundations (pp. 79-93). San Diego, CA, Academic Press, Inc.
13. Fujiki, N., Naito, Y., Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Shiomi, Y., Nishizawa, S., Konishi, J., & Honjo, I. (1999). Correlation between rCBF and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Auris Nasus Larynx, 26, 229-236.
14. Fujiki, N., Naito, Y., Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Shiomi, Y., Nishizawa, S., Konishi, J., & Honjo, I. (2000). Cortical activity and speech perception performance in cochlear implant users. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 57, 32-35.
15. Giraud, A. L., & Truy, E. (2002). The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1562-1569.
16. Giraud, A. L., Truy, E., Frackowiak, R. S., Gregoire, M. C., Pujol, J. F., & Collet, L. (2000). Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients. Brain, 123 (Pt 7), 1391-1402.
17. Herzog, H., Lamprecht, A., Kuhn, A., Roden, W., Vosteen, K. H., & Feinendegen, L. E. (1991). Cortical activation in profoundly deaf patients during cochlear implant stimulation demonstrated by H2(15)O PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 15, 369-375.
18. Hurwitz, B. E., Dietrich, W. D., McCabe, P. M., Alonso, O., Watson, B. D., Ginsberg, M. D., & Schneiderman, N. (1991). Amphetamine promotes recovery from sensory-motor integration deficit after thrombotic infarction of the primary somatosensory rat cortex. Stroke, 22, 648-654.
19. Ito, J., Sakakibara, J., Iwasaki, Y., & Yonekura, Y. (1993). Positron emission tomography of auditory sensation in deaf patients and patients with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 102, 797-801.
20. Jancke, L., Gaab, N., Wustenberg, T., Scheich, H., & Heinze, H. J. (2001). Short-term functional plasticity in the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 12, 479-485.
21. Jonason, K. R., Lauber, S. M., Robbins, M. J., Meyer, P. M., & Meyer, D. R. (1970). Effects of amphetamine upon relearning pattern and black-white discriminations following neocortical lesions in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol, 73, 47-55.
22. Kral, A., Tillein, J., Heid, S., Hartmann, R., & Klinke, R. (2004). Postnatal Cortical Development in Congenital Auditory Deprivation. Cereb. Cortex.
23. Lacaille, J. C., Harley, C. W. (1985). The action of norepinephrine in the dentate gyrus: beta-mediated facilitation of evoked potentials in vitro. Brain Res, 358, 210-20.
24. Montague, P. R., Dayan, P., Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. J Neurosci, 16, 1936-1947.
25. Morita, T., Naito, Y., Tsuji, J., Nakamura, T., Yamaguchi, S., & Ito, J. (2004). Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl, 56-59.
26. Naito, Y., Hirano, S., Fujiki, N., Nishizawa, S., Takahashi, H., Kojima, H., Yamaguchi, S., Kawano, M., Konishi, J., & Honjo, I. (2000a). Development and plasticity of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users: a follow-up study by positron emission tomography. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 57, 55-59.
27. Naito, Y., Hirano, S., Honjo, I., Okazawa, H., Ishizu, K., Takahashi, H., Fujiki, N., Shiomi, Y., Yonekura, Y., & Konishi, J. (1997). Sound-induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and prelingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Acta Otolaryngol, 117, 490-496.
28. Naito, Y., Okazawa, H., Honjo, I., Takahashi, H., Kawano, M., Ishizu, K., & Yonekura, Y. (1995). Cortical activation during sound stimulation in cochlear implant users demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 166, 60-64.
29. Naito, Y., Tateya, I., Fujiki, N., Hirano, S., Ishizu, K., Nagahama, Y., Fukuyama, H., & Kojima, H. (2000b). Increased cortical activation during hearing of speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res, 143, 139-146.
30. Nicoll, R. A., Malenka, R. C. (1995). Contrasting properties of two forms of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature, 377, 115-8.
31. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., & Sullivan, J. A. (1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099.
32. Nishimura, H., Doi, K., Iwaki, T., Hashikawa, K., Oku, N., Teratani, T., Hasegawa, T., Watanabe, A., Nishimura, T., & Kubo, T. (2000). Neural plasticity detected in short- and long-term cochlear implant users using PET. Neuroreport, 11, 811-815.
33. Okazawa, H., Naito, Y., Yonekura, Y., Sadato, N., Hirano, S., Nishizawa, S., Magata, Y., Ishizu, K., Tamaki, N., Honjo, I., & Konishi, J. (1996). Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects. A study with H2(15)O and PET. Brain, 119 (Pt 4), 1297-1306.
34. Roland, P. S., Tobey, E. A., & Devons, M. D., Sr. (2001). Preoperative functional assessment of auditory cortex in adult cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope, 111, 77-83.
35. Shiomi, Y., Naito, Y., Honjo, I., Fujiki, N., Kaneko, K., Takahashi, H., Yamashita, M., & Kawano, M. (1999). Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing. Auris Nasus Larynx, 26, 369-374.
36. Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
37. Truy, E., Deiber, M. P., Cinotti, L., Mauguiere, F., Froment, J. C., & Morgon, A. (1995). Auditory cortex activity changes in long-term sensorineural deprivation during crude cochlear electrical stimulation: evaluation by positron emission tomography. Hear Res, 86, 34-42.
38. Walker-Batson, D. (2000). Use of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia. Brain Lang, 71, 252-254.
39. Webster, D. B., & Webster, M. (1977). Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch Otolaryngol, 103, 392-396.
40. Wertz, R. T., Weiss, D. G., Aten, J. L., Brookshire, R. H., Garcia-Bunuel, L., Holland, A. L., Kurtzke, J. F., LaPointe, L. L., Milianti, F. J., Brannegan, R. (1986). Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Arch. Neurol, 43, 653-658.
41. Wong, D., Miyamoto, R. T., Pisoni, D. B., Sehgal, M., & Hutchins, G. D. (1999). PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech. Hear Res, 132, 34-42.