Extrapolating local lymph node assay EC3 values to estimate relative sensitizing potency

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 135-145

  Ryan, Cindy A ^a   Chaney, Joel G ^a   Gerberick, G Frank ^a   Kern, Petra S ^a   Dearman, Rebecca J ^b   Kimber, Ian ^b   Basketter, David A ^c  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EC3 value; Local lymphnode assay; Potency, Skin sensitization

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LOGLINEAR MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 34347386417     PISSN: 15569527     EISSN: 15569535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15569520701212258     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Basketter DA, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF. The local lymph node assay: past, present and future. Contact Derm 2002; 47(6):315-328.
2. Dean JH, Twerdok LE, Tice RR, Sailstad DM, Hattan DG, Stokes WS. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2001; 34(3):258-273.
3. Balls M, Hellsten E. Statement on the validity of the local lymph node assay for skin sensitisation testing. ATLA 2000; 28(3):366-367.
4. Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Felter SP, White IR, Basketter DA. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Derm 2001; 45(6):333-340.
5. Kimber I, Gerberick GF, Basketter DA. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. Fd Chem Toxicol 1999; 37(5):553-560.
6. Kimber I, Basketter DA, Berthold K, Butler M, Garrigue J-L, Lea L, Newsome C, Roggeband R, Steiling W, Stropp G, Waterman S, Wiemann C. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. Tox Sci 2001; 59(2):198-208.
7. Kimber I, Basketter DA, Butler M, Gamer A, Garrigue J-L, Gerberick GF, Newsome C, Steiling W, Vohr H-W. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. Fd Chem Toxicol 2003; 41(12):1799-1809.
8. Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Dickens A, Briggs D, Pate I, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses. J Appl Toxicol 1999; 19(4):261-266.
9. Basketter DA, Blaikie L, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Harvey P, Evans P, White IR, Rycroft RJG. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Derm 2000; 42(6):344-348.
10. Gerberick GF,RobinsonMK, Ryan CA, DearmanRJ, Kimber I, BasketterDA, Wright Z, Marks JG. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am J Contact Derm 2001; 12(3):156-161.
11. Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Lea LJ, Basketter DA, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations. J Appl Toxicol 1999; 19(4):255-260.
12. Dearman RJ, Wright ZM, Basketter DA, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I. The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Derm 2001; 44(6):357-361.
13. Basketter DA, Cadby P. Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay. Contact Derm 2004; 50(1):15-17.
14. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kern PS, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Patlewicz GY, Basketter DA. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing. Contact Derm 2004; 50(5):274-288.
15. OECD. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline No. 429. Skin Sensitization: The Local Lymph Node Assay. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. 2002.
16. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kern PS, Schlatter H, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Patlewicz GY, Basketter DA. Compilation of historical local lymph node assay data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods. Dermatitis 2005; 16(4):157-202.
17. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC). Technical Report No. 87, Contact Sensitisation: Classification According to Potency. Brussels, Belgium, April 2003.
18. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 7th ed; Ames, IA: The Iowa State -University Press, 1980:191-192.
19. Wright ZM, Basketter DA, Blaikie L, Cooper KJ, Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay. Int J of Cosmet Sci 2001; 23(2):75-83.