The Law of American Party Finance

Party Funding and Campaign Financing in International Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 213-240

  Persily, Nathaniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347375626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. N Persily, ‘Contested Concepts in Campaign Finance’, (2003) 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 607.
2. N Persily, ‘Soft Parties and Strong Money’ (2004) 3 Election Law Journal 315.
3. VO Key, Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups (5th ed, New York TY Crowell, 1964) 163–5
4. N Persily and BE Cain, The Legal Status of Political Parties: A Reassessment of Competing Paradigms, (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 775, 778–9.
5. N Persily, ‘Soft Money and Slippery Slopes’ (2002) 1 Election Law Journal 401, 407
6. JE Kindell and JF Reilly, Election Year Issues (2001) (available at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/topici02.pdf).
7. DL Simmons, ‘An Essay on Federal Income Taxation and Campaign Finance Reform’ (2002) 54 Florida Law Review 1.
8. American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties, ‘Toward a More Responsible Two Party System’ (1950) 44 American Political Science Review (Supplement).
9. R Fleisher and JR Bond, ‘Partisanship and the President’s Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress’ in Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era (Washington, DC, Congressional Quarterly, 2000)
10. M Collie and J Mason, ‘The Electoral Connection Between Party and Constituency Considered’ in D Brady, J Cogan and M Fiorina (eds), Continuity and Change in House Elections (Palo Alto, Stanford Press, 2000).
11. R Fleisher and JR Bond, ‘The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress’ (2004) 34 British Journal of Political Science 429.
12. JS Krasno and F Sorauf, ‘Why Soft Money Has Not Strengthened Parties’ in A Corrado et al (eds), Inside the Campaign Finance Battle: Court Testimony on the New Reforms (Washington, DC, Brookings, 2003) 51
13. BE Keith et al, The Myth of the Independent Voter (Berkeley, UC Press, 1992).
14. LM Bartels, ‘Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996’ (2000) 44 American Journal of Political Science 35
15. R Fleisher and JR Bond, ‘The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress,’ (2004) 34 British Journal of Political Science 429.
16. WE Miller and JM Shanks, The New American Voter (Cambridge, Harvard Press, 1996) 128–40.
17. D Green et al, Partisan Hearts and Minds (New Haven, Yale Press, 2002).
18. RJ La Raja, ‘Why Soft Money Has Strengthened Parties’ in Corrado et al (eds), n 38
19. N Polsby, The Consequences of Party Reform (Oxford, Oxford Press, 1983)
20. SM Milkis, ‘Parties versus Interest Groups’ in Corrado et al (eds), n 38
21. RJ La Raja, ‘Why Soft Honey Has Strengthened Parties’ in Corrado et al (eds), n 38
22. J Aldrich, Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America (Chicago, U Chicago Press, 1995) 273
23. VA Farrar-Myers and D Dwyre, ‘Parties and Campaign Finance,’ in JE Cohen et al (eds), American Political Parties: Decline Or Resurgence (Washington, DC, Congressional Quarterly, 2001).
24. D Green, ‘The Need for Federal Regulation of State Party Activity’ in Corrado et al (eds), n 38