Management of data quality-development of a computer-mediated guideline

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 124, Issue , 2006, Pages 477-482

  Stausberg, Jürgen ^a   Nonnemacher, Michael ^a   Weiland, Dorothea ^a   Antony, Gisela ^b   Neuhäuser, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b Competence Network on Parkinson's Disease ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Documentation; Feedback; Quality control; Source data verification

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION;

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; QUALITY INDICATORS; SOURCE DATA; STANDARD PROCEDURES; SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT;

DATA REDUCTION;

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GERMANY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL;

FEEDBACK; GERMANY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 34347343111     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Arts DG, De Keizer NF, Scheffer GJ. Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002; 9: 600-11.
2. Stausberg J. Evaluation of quality control methods for medical documentation. In: Pappas C, Maglaveras N, Scherrer JR, eds. Medical Informatics Europe '97. Amsterdam: IOS, 1997: 864-8.
3. De Lusignan S. Using feedback to raise the quality of primary care computer data: a literature review. In: Engelbrecht R, Geissbühler A, Lovis C, Mihalas G, eds. Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics. Proceedings of MIE2005. Amsterdam: IOS, 2005: 593-8.
4. Khosla R, Verma DD, Kapur A, Khosla S. Efficient source data verification. Indian Journal of Phamacology 2000; 32: 180-6.
5. Ose C, Weiland D, Jöckel K-H. How to practice low cost monitoring in clinical trials. Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in Medizin und Biologie 2004; 35: 54-62 (in German).
6. AWMF, Arztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin. Das Leitlinien-Manual von AWMF und AZQ. Z. ärztl. Fortbild. Qual. sich. 2001; 95: Supplement I.
7. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-8.
8. Weiss RB. Systems of protocol review, quality assurance, and data audit. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1998; 42: S88-S92.
9. Maruszewski B, Lacour-Gayet F, Monro JL, Keogh BE, Tobota Z, Kansy A. An attempt at data verification in the EACTS Congenital Database. Eur J Cardiothorac. Surg 2005; 28: 400-4.
10. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J. Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001; 63: 123-31.
11. Pogash RM, Boehmer SJ, Forand PE, Dyer AM, Kunselman SJ. Data management procedures in the Asthma Clinical Research Network. Control Clin. Trials 2001; 22:168S-80S.
12. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.