Using feedback to raise the quality of primary care computer data: Aliterature review

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 116, Issue , 2005, Pages 593-598

  De Lusignan, Simon ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computers; Diffusion of innovation; Family practice; Feedback; Literature; Medical informatics; Primary health care; Review

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS; FEEDBACK; REVIEWS;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS; FAMILY PRACTICE; LITERATURE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY HEALTHCARE;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 34347347615     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Pan American Health Organization. Primary Health Care - 25 years of the Alma-Ata declaration. www.paho.org/English/DD/PIN/alma-Ata-declaration.htm.
2. Starfield B. Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
3. Informatics in Primary Care. www.radcliffe-oxford.com/ipc.
4. American Medical Informatics Association Primary Care Informatics Working Group (AMIA PCIWG). www.amia.org/working/pci/main.html.
5. European Federation for Primary Care Informatics (EFMI) Primary Care Working Group. www.efmi.org/efmi/wg.asp?page=groups2&wgid=6.
6. International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA). Working Group No 5: Primary Care. www.imia.org/.
7. World Organisation of Family Doctors (Wonca) Informatics Working Party. www.globalfamilydoctor.com/aboutWonca/working-groups/index.htm.
8. Musen MA, van Bemmel JH. Challenges for medical informatics as an academic discipline. Methods of Information in Medicine 2002; 41:1-3.
9. Sullivan F. What is health informatics? Journal of Health Services Research Policy 2001; 6(4):251-254.
10. de Lusignan S. What is Primary Care Informatics? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10:304-309.
11. de Lusignan S, Hague N, Brown A, Majeed A. An educational intervention to improve data recording in the management of ischaemic heart disease in primary care. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):34-7.
12. van der Lei J, Musen MA, van der Does E, Man Veld AJ, van Bemmel JH. Comparison of computer-Aided and human review of general practitioners' management of hypertension. Lancet. 1991;338(8781):1504-8.
13. D. L. Hunt, R. Jaeschke, K. A. McKibbon, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXI. Using Electronic Health Information Resources in Evidence-Based Practice JAMA, 2000;283(14):1875 - 1879.
14. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. The Medline database. BMJ. 1997;315(7101):180-3.
15. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Getting evidence into practice. Effective Healthcare 1999, 5(1). URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ehc51.pdf.
16. Buntinx F, Winkens R, Grol R, Knottnerus JA. Influencing diagnostic and preventive performance in ambulatory care by feedback and reminders. A review. Fam Pract. 1993;10(2):219-28.
17. Pop P, Winkens RA. A diagnostic centre for general practitioners: results of individual feedback on diagnostic actions. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989;39(329):507-8.
18. Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA, Crebolder HF, Seegers T, Essed GG, Schouten H. Does feedback improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1993;43(370):194-8.
19. Ferguson RI, Maling TJ. The Nelson general practice prescribing project. Part II: Prescribing reports for self audit. N Z Med J. 1990;103(902):560-2.
20. Fraser RC, Farooqi A, Sorrie R. Use of vitamin B-12 in Leicestershire practices: A single topic audit led by a medical audit advisory group. BMJ. 1995;311(6996):28-30.
21. Rokstad K, Straand J, Fugelli P. Can drug treatment be improved by feedback on prescribing profiles combined with therapeutic recommendations? A prospective, controlled trial in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(8):1061-8.
22. Lassen LC, Kristensen FB. Peer comparison feedback to achieve rational and economical drug therapy in general practice: A controlled intervention study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;10(1):76-80.
23. Porcheret M, Hughes R, Evans D, Jordan K, Whitehurst T, Ogden H, Croft P; North Staffordshire General Practice Research Network. Data quality of general practice electronic health records: The impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(1):78-86.
24. van den Hombergh P, Grol R, van den Hoogen HJ, van den Bosch WJ. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers. Qual Health Care. 1999;8(3):161-6.
25. van den Hombergh P, Grol R, van den Hoogen HJ, van den Bosch WJ. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: Acceptance and feasibility. Qual Health Care. 1999;8(3):167-71.
26. Zwar N, Henderson J, Britt H, McGeechan K, Yeo G. Influencing antibiotic prescribing by prescriber feedback and management guidelines: A 5-year follow-up. Fam Pract. 2002;19(1):12-7.
27. Baker R, Falconer Smith J, Lambert PC. Randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of feedback in improving test ordering in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003;21(4):219-23.
28. de Marco P, Dain C, Lockwood T, Roland M. How valuable is feedback of information on hospital referral patterns? BMJ. 1993;307(6917):1465-6.
29. Hickey A, Scott I, Denaro C, Stewart N, Bennett C, Theile T. Using clinical indicators in a quality improvement programme targeting cardiac care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16 Suppl 1:11-25.
30. Watkins C, Timm A, Gooberman-Hill R, Harvey I, Haines A, Donovan J. Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: A qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):661-9.
31. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York, Free Press, 1995.
32. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1969-75.
33. Berg M. Rationalizing medical work. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1997.
34. Checkland P, Scholes J. Soft Systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley, 1999.
35. Chapman J. A systems perspective on computing in the NHS. Informatics in Primary Care 2002;10:197-9.
36. Teasdale S, Bainbridge M. Improving information management in family practice: Testing an adult learning model. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997; 19:687-692.
37. deLusignan S, Teasdale S. The features of an effective primary care data quality programme. In, Ed. Bryant JR. Perspective in Healthcare Computing, Proceedings of HC2004. Swindon: British Computer Society, 2004.
38. Fugelli P. Clinical practice: between Aristotle and Cochrane. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1998;128(6):184-8.
39. Suchman L. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
40. de Lusignan S, Wells SE, Hague NJ, Thiru K. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):416-22.
41. Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach (academic detailing) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990 Jan 26;263(4):549-56.