University-industry interactions: The case of the UK biotech industry

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 371-392

  Smith, Helen Lawton ^a   Bagchi Sen, Sharmistha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENTREPRENEUR; INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; OXFORDSHIRE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34347256676     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: 14698390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662710601032697     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Audretsch, D. and Stephan, P. E. (1996) Company-scientists' locational links: The case of biotechnology,. American Economic Review, 86, pp. 641-652.
2. Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory,. Research Policy, 29, pp. 627-655.
3. Casper, S. and Matraves, C. (2003) Institutional frameworks and innovation in the German and UK pharmaceutical industry,. Research Policy, 1, pp. 865-1879.
4. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D,. Management Science, 48:1, pp. 1-23.
5. Dahlander, L. and McKelvey, M. (2003) Revisiting frequency and spatial distribution: Innovation collaboration for biotech firms,. paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on The role of Geography, Institutions and Organizations, Copenhagen
6. David, P. A. and Foray, D. (1995) Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base,. STI Review, 16, pp. 13-68.
7. Davis, C. (2005) Happy returns for floated spin-off firms,. The Times Higher, p. 5.
8. Gregorio, D. Di and Shane, S. (2003) Why so some universities generate more start-ups than others?,. Research Policy, 32, pp. 209-227.
9. DTI (1988) DTI-The Department for Enterprise, Department of Trade and Industry, London
10. DTI (1993) Realising Our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Technology and Engineering, Department of Trade and Industry, London
11. DTI (1995) Competitiveness: Forging Ahead, Department of Trade and Industry, London
12. DTI (1998) Our Competitive Future, Department of Trade and Industry, London
13. DTI (2005) Comparative Statistics for the UK, European and US Biotechnology Sectors: Analysis Year 2003, DTI, London
14. Edqvist, O. (2003) Layered science and science policies,. Minerva, 41, pp. 207-221.
15. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B. R. Cantisano (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution from ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm,. Research Policy, 29:2, pp. 313-330.
16. Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J. and Burton, R. (2002) Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities,. Management Science, 48:1, pp. 105-121.
17. Florida, R. and Cohen, W. (1999) Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development,. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, pp. 589-610. MIT, Cambridge, MA
18. Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class, Basic Books, New York
19. Freeman, C. (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London
20. Gans, J., Hsu, D. and Stern, S. (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the Gale of creative destruction?,. Rand Journal of Economics, 33:4, pp. 571-587.
21. Geuna, A. and Nesta, L. (2003) University patenting and its effects in academic research,
22. Grupp, H. (1995) Science, high-technology and the competitiveness of EU countries,. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19:1, pp. 204-209.
23. Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. House of Commons Health Committee (2005) The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry, The Stationery Office Limited, London
25. Ince, M. (2005) Harvard shows it has the winning in the genes,. The Times Higher, p. 10.
26. Kenney, M. (1986) Biotechnology: The University-Industry Complex, Yale University Press, New Haven
27. Smith, H. Lawton (2003) Knowledge organizations and local economic development: The cases of Oxford and Grenoble,. Regional Studies, 37:2, pp. 899-909.
28. Smith, H. Lawton (2005) The biotechnology industry in Oxfordshire: enterprise and innovation,. European Planning Studies, 12:7, pp. 985-1002.
29. Smith, H. Lawton and Glasson, J. (2005) Public Research High-tech Spin-offs: Measuring Performance and Growth in Oxfordshire, Oxfordshire Economic Observatory, Oxford
30. Lee, C. B. and Walshok, M. L. (2003) Total links matter: The Direct and Indirect Effects of Research Universities in Regional Economies,
31. Dahstrand, A. Lindholm (2005) University knowledge transfer and the role of academic spin-offs. Paper prepared for OECD Conference,
32. Mehta, S. (2004) The emerging role of academia in commercialising innovation,. Nature Biotechnology, 22:1, pp. 21-24.
33. Nelsen, L. (1991) The lifeblood of biotechnology: University-industry technology transfer,. The Business of Biotechnology, Butterworth-Heinmann, Boston
34. OECD (2001) Fostering High-tech Spin-offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation, OECD, Paris
35. Owen-Smith, P. and Powell, W. W. (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community,. Organisation Science, 15, pp. 5-21.
36. Oxford Bioscience Network (2002) Growth & Sustainability, the Cluster Report 2002, Oxford Bioscience Network, Oxford
37. Oxford Bioscience Network (2005) Oxfordshire Bioscience Cluster Report 2005, Oxford Bioscience Network, Oxford
38. Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B. and Nlemvo, F. (2003) Toward a typology of university spin-offs,. Small Business Economics, 21:4, pp. 355-369.
39. Ruivo, B. (1994) 'Phases' or 'Paradigms' of science policy?,. Science and Public Policy, 21:3, pp. 157-164.
40. Shane, S. (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spin-offs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
41. Shepherd, J. (2006) Oxbridge wins research cash race,. The Times Higher, p. 9.
42. Teece, D. J. (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy,. Research Policy, 15, pp. 208-305.
43. UNICO (2003) UK University Commericalisation Survey: Financial Year 2003, UNICO, London
44. Waters, R. and Smith, H. Lawton (2002) RDAs and Local Economic Development: Scale and competitiveness in Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire,. European Planning Studies, 10:5, pp. 633-649.
45. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Armstrong, J. (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets?,. Economic Inquiry, 36:1, pp. 65-86.
46. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Terero, M. (2002) Labor mobility from academe to commerce,. Journal of Labor Economics, 20:3, pp. 629-660.