Exploring design features for enhancing players' challenge in strategy games

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 393-397

  Shang, Hwa Hsu ^a   Wen, Ming Hui ^a   Wu, Muh Cherng ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PLAY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; COGNITION; COMPUTERS; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MALE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 34347213454     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9940     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Malone, T.W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivated instruction. Cognitive Science 4:333-369.
2. Myers, D. (1990). A Q-study of game player aesthetics. Simulation & Gaming 21:375-396.
3. Pagulayan, R.J., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., et al. (2003). User-centered design in games. In: Jacko, J.A., & Sears, A.E. (eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Hillsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., pp. 883-906.
4. Asgari, M., & Kaufman, D. (2004). Intrinsic motivation and game design. Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association (ISAGA) and Conjoint Conference of SAGSAGA.
5. Fabricatore, C., Nussbaum, M., & Rosas, R. (2002). Payability in action videogames: a qualitative design model. Human-Computer Interaction 17:311-368.
6. Hsu, S.H., Lee, F.L., & Wu, M.C. (2005). Designing action games for appealing to buyers. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8:585-591.
7. Hong, J.C., & Liu, M.C. (2003). A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games. Computer in Human Behavior 19:245-258.
8. Crawford, C. (1982). The art of computer game design. Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.
9. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Pruitt, J.S. (1996). Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision-making research. Human Factors 38:193-205.
10. rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
11. Cohen, K.J., & Cyert, R.M. (1975). Theory of the firm: resource allocation in a market economy, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. van Beest, I., van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2004). Resources and alternatives in coalition formation: the effects on payoff, self-serving behaviour, and bargaining length. European Journal of Social Psychology 34:713-728.
13. rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small System. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 162-169.
14. Endsley, M.R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37: 65-84.
15. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14:33-46.
16. Miller, C.E. (1980). Effects of payoffs and resources: a test of four theories of coalition formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:153-164.
17. Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). Resources, capabilities, and the performance of industrial firms: a multivariate analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics 25:299-315
18. Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., & Meshkati, N. (eds.), Human mental workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 139-183.
19. Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., & Yung, Y.F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in on-line environments: a structural modeling approach. Marketing Science 19:22-42.