Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 211-221

  Foley, Mary Ann ^a   Foley, Hugh J ^a  

^a SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAGRAM; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; MONITORING; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; READING; RECALL; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 34250897858     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193442     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
2. BLAXTON, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures'. Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657-668.
3. DEWHURST, S. A., & HITCH, G. J. (1999). Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory, 7, 129-146.
4. DEWINSTANLEY, P. A. (1995). A generation effect can be found during naturalistic learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 538-541.
5. FINKE, R. A., JOHNSON, M. K., & SHYI, G. C. (1988). Memory confusions for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 16, 133-137.
6. FOLEY, M. A., DURSO, F. T., WILDER, A., & FRIEDMAN, R. (1991). Developmental comparisons of explicit versus implicit imagery and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 1-13.
7. FOLEY, M. A., FOLEY, H. J., DURLEY, J., & MAITNER, A. (2006). Anticipating partners' responses: Examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1539-1547.
8. FOLEY, M. A., FOLEY, H. J., & KORENMAN, L. M. (2002). Adapting a memory framework (source monitoring) to the study of closure processes. Memory & Cognition, 30, 412-422.
9. FOLEY, M. A., FOLEY, H. J., WILDER, A., & RUSCH, L. (1989). Anagram solving: Does effort have an effect? Memory & Cognition, 17, 755-758.
10. FOLEY, M. A., JOHNSON, M. K., & RAYE, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech. Child Development, 54, 51-60.
11. FOLEY, M. A., & RATNER, H. H. (1998). Children's recoding memory for collaboration: A way of learning from others. Cognitive Development, 13, 91-108.
12. FOLEY, M. A., SANTINI, C., & SOPASAKIS, M. (1989). Discriminating between memories: Evidence for children's spontaneous elaborations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 146-169.
13. GARDINER, J. M. (2000). On the objectivity of subjective experiences of autonoetic and noetic consciousness. In E. Tulving (Ed.), Memory, consciousness, and the brain: The Tallinn Conference (pp. 159-172). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
14. GARDINER, J. M., RAMPONI, C., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1999). Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory. Consciousness & Cognition, 8, 484-496.
15. GLISKY, E. L., & RABINOWITZ, J. C. (1985). Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 193-205.
16. GREENE, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 375-383.
18. HIRSHMAN, E., & BJORK, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 14, 484-494.
19. JACOBY, L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
20. JOHNS, E. E., & SWANSON, L. G. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 180-190.
21. JOHNSON, M. K., FOLEY, M. A., SUENGAS, A. G., & RAYE, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.
22. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
23. JOHNSON, M. K., & RAYE, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 35-86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. JOHNSON, M. K., RAYE, C. L., FOLEY, H. J., & FOLEY, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
25. KELLEY, M. R., & NAIRNE, J. S. (2001). von Restorff revisited: Isolation, generation, and memory for order. Memory & Cognition, 27, 54-66.
26. KINJO, H., & SNODGRASS, J. G. (2000). Does the generation effect occur for pictures? American Journal of Psychology, 113, 95-121.
27. KINOSHITA, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 563-571.
28. LINDSAY, D. S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.
29. MARSH, E. J., EDELMAN, G., & BOWER, G. H. (2001). Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 798-805.
30. MARSH, R. L., & BOWER, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 673-688.
31. MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
32. MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. (1958). Anagram solution times: A function of letter order and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 376-379.
33. MCDANIEL, M. A., EINSTEIN, G. O., & LOLLIS, T. (1988). Qualitative and quantitative considerations in encoding difficulty effects. Memory & Cognition, 16, 8-14.
34. MCELROY, L. A., & SLAMECKA, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 249-259.
35. MCNAMARA, D. S., & HEALY, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 399-416.
36. MCNAMARA, D. S., & HEALY, A. F. (2000). A procedural explanation of the generation effect for simple and difficult multiplication problems and answers. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 652-679.
37. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 436-450.
38. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: Influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 541-554.
39. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 30, 838-855.
40. MURNANE, K., & BAYEN, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
41. NAIRNE, J. S., PUSEN, C., & WIDNER, R. L. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 13, 183-191.
42. NAIRNE, J. S., & WIDNER, R. L. (1987). Generation effects with non-words: The role of test appropriateness Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 164-171.
43. RABINOWITZ, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults. Psychology & Aging, 4, 259-268.
44. ROSS, H. S., & BALZER, R. H. (1975). Determinants and consequences of children's questions. Child Development, 46, 536-539.
45. ROSS, H. S., & KILLEY, J. C. (1977). The effect of questioning on retention. Child Development, 48, 312-314.
46. SCHMIDT, S. R., & CHERRY, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 17, 359-369.
47. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
48. SRINIVAS, K., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 389-412.
49. STEFFENS, M. C., & ERDFELDER, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 705-733.
50. TACONNAT, L., & ISINGRINI, M. (2004). Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: Role of aging and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 827-837.
51. THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, 1. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher's College Press.
52. TYLER, S. W., HERTEL, P. T., MCCALLUM, M. C., & ELLIS, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 607-617.
53. ZACKS, R. T., HASHER, L., SANFT, H., & ROSE, K. C. (1983). Encoding effort and recall: A cautionary note. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 747-756.