Anticipating partners' responses: Examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1539-1547

  Foley, Mary Ann ^a   Foley, Hugh J ^a   Durley, Jaime R ^b   Maitner, Angela T ^c  

^a SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CONVERSATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33846189824     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195917     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BAKER-WARD, L., HESS, T. M., & FLANNAGAN, D. A. (1990). The effects of involvement on children's memory for events. Cognitive Development, 5, 55-69.
2. BAYEN, U. J., MURNANE, K., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 197-215.
3. BEGG, I., & SNIDER, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 533-563.
4. BROWN, A. S., & MURPHY, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 432-442.
5. FOLEY, M. A., & FOLEY, H. J. (in press). Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory. Memory & Cognition.
6. FOLEY, M. A., FOLEY, H. J., WILDER, A., & RUSCH, L. (1989). Anagram solving: Does effort have an effect? Memory & Cognition, 17, 755-758.
7. FOLEY, M. A., JOHNSON, M. K., & RAYE, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech. Child Development, 54, 51-60.
8. FOLEY, M. A., & RATNER, H. H. (1998). Children's recoding memory for collaboration: A way of learning from others. Cognitive Development, 13, 91-108.
9. FOLEY, M. A., RATNER, H. H., & GENTES, E. (2005, April). Walking in another's shoes: The role of perspective in memory for collaborative exchanges. Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta.
10. FOLEY, M. A., RATNER, H. H., & HOUSE, A. T. (2002). Anticipation and source-monitoring errors: Children's memory for collaborative activities. Journal of Cognitive Development, 3, 385-414.
11. FOLEY, M. A., RATNER, H. H., & PASSALACQUA, C. (1993). Appropriating the actions of another: Implications for children's memory and learning. Cognitive Development, 8, 373-401.
12. GARDINER, J. M., RAMPONI, C., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1999). Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory. Consciousness & Cognition, 8, 484-496.
13. GREENE, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. GREENWALD, A. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
15. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 375-383.
16. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
17. JOHNSON, M. K., RAYE, C. L., FOLEY, H. J., & FOLEY, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
18. JURICA, P. J., & SHIMAMURA, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648-656.
19. KINJO, H., & SNODGRASS, J. G. (2000). Does the generation effect occur for pictures? American Journal of Psychology, 113, 95-121.
20. LANDAU, J. D., & MARSH, R. L. (1997). Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 265-270.
21. LINDSAY, D. S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.
22. MACRAE, C. N., BODENHAUSEN, G. V., & CALVINI, G. (1999). Contexts of cryptomnesia: May the source be with you. Social Cognition, 17, 273-297.
23. MARSH, E. J., EDELMAN, G., & BOWER, G. H. (2001). Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 798-805.
24. MARSH, R. L., & BOWER, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 673-688.
25. MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
26. MARSH, R. L., & LANDAU, J. D. (1995). Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1568-1582.
27. MARSH, R. L., LANDAU, J. D., & HICKS, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 886-897.
28. MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. (1958). Anagram solution times: A function of letter order and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 376-379.
29. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 436-450.
30. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 838-855.
31. MURNANE, K., & BAYEN, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428.
32. RATNER, H. H., FOLEY, M. A., & GIMPERT, N. (2002). The role of collaborative planning in children's source monitoring errors and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 44-73.
33. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
34. SLAMECKA, N. J., & KATSAITI, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 589-607.
35. SRINIVAS, K., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 389-412.
36. STEFFENS, M. C., & ERDFELDER, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 705-733.
37. TACONNAT, L., & ISINGRINI, M. (2004). Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: Role of aging and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 827-837.
38. TAYLOR, F. K. (1965). Cryptomnesia and plagiarism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 1111-1118.
39. THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.