Evaluating a New Urbanist neighborhood

Berkeley Planning Journal

Volumn 19, Issue , 2006, Pages 59-78

  Dill, Jennifer ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE; LAND USE PLANNING; SOCIAL CAPITAL; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN TRANSPORT; URBANIZATION;

EID: 34250888026     PISSN: 10475192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. 2001. Travel by Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Brown, B. B., and V. L. Cropper. 2001. New urban and standard suburban subdivisions - Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(4): 402419.
3. Cervero, R., and Radisch, C. 1996. Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3(3):127-141.
4. Congress for the New Urbanism. 2000. Charter of the New Urbanism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Crane, R., and R. Crepeau. 1998. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel?: A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Transportation Research D 3(4):225-238.
6. Crane, R., and L. A. Schweitzer. 2003. Transport and Sustainability: The Role of the Built Environment. Built Environment 29(3):238-252.
7. Ellis, C. 2002. The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design 7(3):261-291.
8. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. Transportation Research Record 1780, 87-114.
9. Greenwald, M. 2003. The Road Less Traveled: New Urbanist Inducements to Travel Mode Substitution for Nonwork Trips. Journal of Planning Education and Research 23(1):39-57.
10. Handy, S. 1996. Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record 1552: 135-144.
11. Khattak, A. J., and D. Rodriguez. 2005. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 39(6): 481-500.
12. Kim, J. 2000. Creating community: Does the Kentlands live up to its goals? Places-a Forum of Environmental Design 13(2): 48-55.
13. Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. 1997. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24:125-158.
14. Krizek, K. J. 2003. Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(3): 265-281.
15. Levine, J. 1999. Access to Choice. Access 14: 16-19.
16. Levine, J., A. Inam, R. Werbel, and G.-W. Torng. 2002. Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Constraint or Expansion of Household Choice? No. 01-19. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
17. Lund, H. 2003. Testing the Claims of New Urbanism: Local Access, Pedestrian Travel, and Neighboring Behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(4): 414-429.
18. Nasar, J. L. 2003. Does Neotraditional Development Build Community? Journal of Planning Education and Research 23(1): 58-68.
19. Podobnik, B. 2002a. New Urbanism and the Generation of Social Capital: Evidence from Orenco Station. National Civic Review 91(3): 245-255.
20. Podobnik, B. 2002b, November 7, 2002. The Social and Environmental Achievements of New Urbanism: Evidencefrom Orenco Station. Retrieved September 25, 2003, from http://www.lclark.edu/~podobnik/orenco02.pdf.
21. Saelens, B. E., J. F. Sallis, and L. D. Frank. 2003. Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings from the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 25(2): 80-91.
22. Sallis, J. F., L. D. Frank, B. E. Saelens, and M. K. Kraft. 2004. Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transportation Research A 38, 249-268.
23. Sander, T. H. 2002. Social Capital and New Urbanism: Leading a Civic Horse to Water? National Civic Review 91(3): 213-234.
24. Talen, E. 1999. Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies 36(8): 1361-1379.