Evidence for a Multiple-process Account of the Generation Effect

Memory

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 483-508

  Chechile, Richard A ^a   Soraci Jr , Sal A ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0004444683     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741944921     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Auble, P.M., Franks, J.J., & Soraci, S.A. (1978). Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or "aha"? Memory and Cognition, 7, 426-434.
2. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1980). Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs. Psychological Review, 87, 375-397.
3. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
4. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
5. Begg, I., Snyder, A., Foley, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 977-989.
6. Bender, R.H., Wallsten, T.S., & Ornstein, P.A. (1996). Age differences in encoding and retrieving details of a pediatric examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 188-198.
7. Brainerd, C.J. (1984). Model-based approaches to storage and retrieval development. In C.J. Brainerd, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Basic processes in memory development: Progress in cognitive research (pp.143-208). New York: Springer Verlag.
8. Brainerd, C.J., & Reyna, V.F. (1991). Acquisition and forgetting processes in normal and learning-disabled children: A disintegration/redisintegration theory. In J.E. Obrzut, & G.W. Hynd (Eds)., Neuropsychological foundation of learning disabilities (pp. 147-178). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Chechile, R.A. (1973). The relative storage and retrieval losses in short-term memory as a function of the similarity and amount of information processing in the interpolated task (Doctoral dissertation, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 1073B-1074B. (University Microfilms No. 74-8689).
10. Chechile, R.A. (1987). Trace susceptibility theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 203-222.
11. Chechile, R.A. (1998). A new method for estimating model parameters for multinomial data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 432-471.
12. Chechile, R.A., & Meyer, D.L. (1976). A Bayesian procedure for separately estimating storage and retrieval components of forgetting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13, 269-295.
13. Chechile, R.A., & Roder, B. (1998). Model-based measurement of group differences: An application directed toward understanding the information-processing mechanisms of developmental dyslexia. In S. Soraci & W.J. McIlvane (Eds.), Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning: Vol. 1 A survey of research approaches (pp.91-112), Stamford, CT: Ablex.
14. Cohen, S., Chechile, R., Smith, G., Tsai, F., & Burns, G. (1994). A method for evaluating the effectiveness of educational software. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 236-241.
15. Craik, F.I.M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 10, 268-294.
16. Elandt-Johnson, R.C. (1971). Probability models and statistical methods in genetics. New York: Wiley.
17. Glisky, E.L., & Rabinowitz, J.C. (1985). Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 193-205.
18. Graf, P. (1982). The memorial consequences of generation and transformation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 539-548.
19. Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
20. Hirschman, E., & Bjork, R.A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 484-494.
21. Horton, K. (1987). The incongruity effect in memory for generated targets: Fact or artifact? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 172-174.
22. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
23. Jacoby, L.L., & Craik, F.I.M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Jacoby, L., Craik, F.I.M., & Begg, I. (1979). Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 585-600.
25. Johns, E.E., & Swanson, L.G. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 581-593.
26. Kucera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
27. McDaniel, M.A., Waddill, P.J., & Einstein, G.O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521-536.
28. McElroy, L.A. (1987). The generation effect with homographs: Evidence for postgeneration processing. Memory & Cognition, 15, 148-153.
29. McFarland, C.E. Jr., Frey, T.J., & Rhodes, D.D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 210-225.
30. McNamara, D.S., & Healy, A.F. (1995). A generation advantage for multiplication skill training and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A.F. Healy & L.E. Bourne Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills, durability, and specificity. New York: Sage.
31. Mitchell, D.B., & Hunt, R.R. (1989). How much "effort" should be devoted to memory? Memory and Cognition, 17, 337-348.
32. Nairne, J.S., & Widner, R.L. Jr. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 164-171.
33. Peynircioglu, Z.F. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures. Acta Psychologica, 70, 153-160.
34. Riefer, D.M., & Rouder, J.N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemoic benefits of bizarre imagery. Memory and Cognition, 20, 601-611.
35. Roenker, D.L., Wenger, S.K., Thompson, C.P., & Watkins, B. (1978). Depth of processing: When the principle of congruity fails. Memory and Cognition, 6, 288-295.
36. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redisintegration in immediate recall. Memory and Cognition, 21, 168-175.
38. Sharp, D.L., Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Goldman, S.R., Kinzer, C., & Soraci, S.A. (1992). Literacy in an age of integrated-media. In M.J. Dreher & W.H. Slater (Eds), Elementary school literacy: Critical issues. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
39. Slamecka, N.J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
40. Soraci, S.A., Jr., Franks, J.J., Bransford, J.D., Chechile, R.A., Belli, R.F., Carr, M., & Carlin, M.T. (1994). Incongruous item generation effects: A multiple-cue perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1-12.
41. Wittrock, M.C. (1978). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Psychologist, 13, 15-29.