Effects of 2D geometric transformations on visual memory

Proceedings - APGV 2006: Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 119-126

  Lam, Heidi ^a   Rensink, Ronald A ^a   Munzner, Tamara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Geometric transformations; Information visualization; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS; INTERFACE DESIGN,; POLAR TRANSFORMATIONS; RESPONSE TIME;

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; SCALABILITY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 34250775377     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1140491.1140515     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. BARTRAM, L., HO, A., DILL, J., AND HENIGMAN, F. 1995. The Continuous Zoom: A Constrained Fisheye Technique for Viewing and Navigating Large Information Space. In Proc ACM UIST, 207-215.
2. BEDERSON, B.B., HOLLAN, J.D. 1994. Pad++: A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. In Proc ACM UIST, 17-26.
3. BEDERSON, B., AND BOLTMAN, A. 1999. Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, 28-35.
4. BEDERSON, B. 2000. Fisheye Menus. In Proc ACM VIST, 217-225.
5. BEDERSON, B., CLAMAGE, A. CZERWINSKI, M., ROBERTSON, G.G. 2004. DateLens: A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs. ACM ToCHI, 11(1), 90-119.
6. CARPENDALE, M.S.T., COWPERTHWAITE, D.J. AND FRACCHIA, F.D. 1997. Making distortions comprehensible. In Proc IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 36-45.
7. CHRISTOU, C.G., TJAN, B.S., BÜLTHOFF, H.H., 2003. Extrinsic cues aid shape recognition from novel viewpoints. Journal of Vision (3) 3, 183-198.
8. CHURCHER N., PRACHUABMOH, P. AND CHURCHER, C. 1997. Visualization techniques for collaborative GIS browsers. International Conference on GeoComputation.
9. GOLDSTEIN, A.G. AND CHANCE, J.E. 1971. Visual Recognition Memory for Complex Configurations. Perception and Psychophysics 9(2), 237-241.
10. HARTLEY, T., TRINKLER, I., BURGESS, N. 2004. Geometric Determinants of Human Spatial Memory. Cognition 94(1), 39-75.
11. LAU, K., RENSINK, R.A., AND MUNZNER, T. 2004. Perceptual Invariance of Nonlinear Focus+Context Transformations. In Proc ACM APGV, 65-72.
12. LEUNG, Y.K. AND APPERLEY, M.D. 1994. A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques. ACM ToCHI, 1(2), 126-160.
13. MISUE, K., & EADES, P., & LAI, W. & SUGIYAMA, K. 1995. Layout adjustment and the mental map. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 6(2) 183-210.
14. RAO, R. AND CARD, S. 1994. Table lens: Merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus plus context visualization for tabular information. In Proc ACM CHI, 318-322.
15. RENSINK, R.A. 2004. The Invariance of Visual Search to Geometric Transformation. Journal of Vision 4.
16. ROBERTSON, G.G., CARD, S.K., AND MACKINLAY, J.D. 1989. The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces. In Proc. ACM UIST, 10-18.
17. ROBERTSON, G., CZERWINSKI, M., LARSON, K., ROBBINS, D., THIEL, D., AND VAN DANTZICH, M. 1998. Data Mountain: using spatial memory for document management. In Proc ACM UIST, 153-162.
18. SARKAR, M. AND BROWN, M.H. 1992. Graphical fisheye views of graphs. In Proc ACM CHI, 83-91.
19. SKOPIK, A., AND GUTWIN, C. 2005. Improving revisitation in fisheye views with visit wear. In Proc ACM CHI, 771-780.
20. WOODRUFF, A., FAULRING, A., ROSENHOLTZ, R., MORRISON, J., AND PIROLLI, P. 2001. Using Thumbnails to Search the Web. In Proc ACM CHI, 198-205.
21. WOBBROCK, J., FORLIZZI, J., HUDSON, S., MYERS, B. WebThumb: Interaction Techniques for Small-Screen Browsers. 2002. In Proc ACM UIST, 205-208.
22. YEE, K.P., FISHER, D., DHAMIJA, R., HEARST, M. 2001. Animated Exploration of Graphs with Radial Layout. In Proc IEEE InfoVis, 45-50.
23. ZANELLA, A., CARPENDALE, M. S. T., ROUNDING, M. 2002. On the effects of viewing cues in comprehending distortions. In Proc ACM CHI, 119-128.