Perceptual invariance of nonlinear Focus+Context transformations

Proceedings - 1st Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, APGV 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 65-72

  Lau, Keith ^a   Rensink, Ronald A ^a   Munzner, Tamara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fisheye transformations; Information visualization; Visual representation; Visual search

Indexed keywords

COSTS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INVARIANCE; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

FISHEYE TRANSFORMATION; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; NONLINEAR FOCUSING; VISUAL REPRESENTATION; VISUAL SEARCH;

FOCUSING;

EID: 14344265727     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1012551.1012563     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. BEDERSON, B. B., CLAMAGE, A., CZERWINSKI, M. P., AND ROBERTSON, G. G. 2004. DateLens: A Fisheye Calendar Interface for PDAs. Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 11, 1 (March), 90-119.
2. BENNETT, D. J. 2002. Evidence for a Pre-Match 'Mental Translation' on a Form-Matching Task. Journal of Vision 12, 50.
3. BUNDESEN, C., AND LARSON, A. 1975. Visual Transformation of Size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1, 214-220.
4. CARPENDALE, M. S. T., AND MONTAGNESE, C. 2001. A Framework for Unifying Presentation Space. In Proc. Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, 61-70.
5. CARPENDALE, M. S. T., COWPERTHWAITE, D. J., AND FRACCHIA, F. D. 1995. 3-Dimensional Pliable Surfaces: for the Effective Presentation of Visual Information. In Proc. Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (VIST), ACM, 217-226.
6. CUTTING, J. E. 1987. Rigidity in Cinema Seen from the Front Row, Side Aisle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13, 323-334.
7. CUTTING, J. E. 1991. On the Efficacy of Cinema, or What the Visual System did not Evolve to Do. London: Taylor & Francis, 486-495.
8. FURNAS, G. W. 1986. Generalized Fisheye Views. In Proc. SIGCHI, ACM, 18-23.
9. GUTWIN, C., AND FEDAK, C. 2004. A Comparison of Fisheye Lenses for Interactive Layout Tasks. In Proc. Graphics Interface 2004.
10. GUTWIN, C., AND FEDAK, C. 2004. Interacting with Big Interfaces on Small Screens: a Comparison of Fisheye, Zoom, and Panning Techniques. In Proc. Graphics Interface.
11. GUTWIN, C., AND SKOPIK, A. 2003. Fisheyes are Good for Large Steering Tasks. In Proc. SIGCHI, ACM, 201-208.
12. GUTWIN, C. 2002. Improving Focus Targeting in Interactive Fisheye Views. In Proc. SIGCHI, ACM, 267-274.
13. HORNBAEK, K., BEDERSON, B., AND PLAISANT, C. 2002. Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview. Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 9, 4, 362-389.
14. KEAHEY, T. A., AND ROBERTSON, E. L. 1996. Techniques for Non-Linear Magnification Transformations. In Proc. Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), IEEE, 38-45.
15. KEAHEY, T. A., AND ROBERTSON, E. L. 1997. Nonlinear Magnification Fields. In Proc. Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), IEEE, 38-45.
16. KOBSA, A. 2003. User Experiments with Tree Visualization Systems Technical Report. Tech. Rep. UCI-ISR-03-11, University of California Irvine Department of Computer Science.
17. LAMPING, J., RAO, R., AND PIROLLI, P. 1995. A Focus+Content Technique Based on Hyperbolic Geometry for Viewing Large Hierarchies. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), ACM, 401-408.
18. LEUNG, Y. K., AND APPERLEY, M. D. 1994. A Review and Taxonomy of Distortion-Oriented Presentation Techniques. Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 1, 2 (June), 126-160.
19. MUNZNER, T., GUIMBRETIERE, F., TASIRAN, S., ZHANG, L., AND ZHOU, Y. 2003. TreeJuxtaposer: Scalable Tree Comparison using Focus+Context with Guaranteed Visibility. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 2003, published as Transactions on Graphics, vol. 22, ACM, 453-462.
20. MUNZNER, T. 1997. H3: Laying Out Large Directed Graphs in 3D Hyperbolic Space. In Proc. Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), IEEE, 2-10.
21. RAO, R., AND CARD, S. K. 1994. The Table Lens: Merging Graphical and Symbolic Representations in an Interactive Focus+Context Visualization for Tabular Information. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94), ACM, 318-322.
22. RENSINK, R. A. 2000. The Dynamic Representation of Scenes. Visual Cognition 7, 17-42.
23. RENSINK, R. A. 2004. The Invariance of Visual Search to Geometric Transformation. Journal of Vision 4. [Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL, USA. May 2004.].
24. RISDEN, K., CZERWINSKI, M. P., MUNZNER, T., AND COOK, D. 2000. An Initial Examination of Ease of Use for 2D and 3D Information Visualizations of Web Content. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 53, 5 (November), 695-714.
25. ROBERTSON, G. G., AND MACKINLAY, J. D. 1993. The Document Lens. In Proc. Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (VIST), ACM, 101-108.
26. ROBERTSON, G. G., CARD, S. K., AND MACKINLAY, J. D. 1989. The Cognitive Coprocessor Architecture for Interactive User Interfaces, In Proc. Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, 10-18.
27. SARKAR, M., AND BROWN, M. H. 1994. Graphical fisheye views. Communications of the ACM 37, 12 (Dec.), 73-84.
28. SARKAR, M., SNIBBE, S. S., TVERSKY, O. J., AND REISS, S. P. 1993. Stretching the Rubber Sheet: A Metaphor for Viewing Large Layouts on Small Screens. In Proc. Symp. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, 81-91.
29. SCHAFFER, D., ZUO, Z., GREENBERG, S., BARTRAM, L., DILL, J., DUBS, S., AND ROSEMAN, M. 1996. Navigating Hierarchically Clustered Networks through Fisheye and Full-Zoom Methods. Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 3, 2 (June), 162-188.
30. SHEPARD, R. N., AND METZLER, J. 1971. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science 171, 701-703.
31. TARR, M. J., AND PINKER, S. 1989. Mental Rotation and Orientation-Dependence in Shape Recognition. Cognitive Psychology 21, 233-282.
32. TREISMAN, A., AND GORMICAN, S. 1988. Feature Analysis in Early Vision: Evidence from Search Asymmetries. Psychological Review 95, 15-48.
33. TREISMAN, A. 1985. Preattentive Processing in Vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 31, 156-177.
34. WARE, C. 2000. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann/Academic Press.
35. ZHANG, J. 1991. The Interaction of Internal and External Representations in a Problem Solving Task. Proc. Thirteenth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society.