The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification

Memory

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 117-127

  Haw, Ryann M ^a   Dickinson, Jason J ^b   Meissner, Christian A ^c  

^a Big Bend Community College   (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDENTITY; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VISUAL MEMORY; WITNESS;

ADULT; COGNITION; CRIME; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250764835     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210601171672     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Behrman, B. W. and Davey, S. L. (2001) Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law & Human Behavior, 25, pp. 475-491.
2. Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. (1990) Gist is the grist: Fuzzy trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, pp. 365-403.
3. Brigham, J. C. and Cairns, D. L. (1988) The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, pp. 1394-1410.
4. Brigham, J. C., Meissner, C. A. and Wasserman, A. W. (1999) Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp. S73-S92.
5. Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K. and Sturgill, W. (1977) Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp. 311-318.
6. Davies, G., Shepherd, J. and Ellis, H. (1979) Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64:2, pp. 232-237.
7. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H. and Penrod, S. D. (2006) Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference. Law & Human Behavior, 30, pp. 287-307.
8. Dysart, J. E., Lindsay, R. C. L., Hammond, R. and Dupuis, P. (2001) Mug shot exposure prior to line-up identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, pp. 1280-1284.
9. Gardiner, J. M. and Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000) Remembering and knowing. The Oxford handbook of memory, pp. 229-244. Oxford University Press, New York
10. Gorenstein, G. W. and Ellsworth, P. C. (1980) Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, pp. 616-622.
11. Hinz, T. and Pezdek, K. (2001) The effect of exposure to multiple line-ups on face identification accuracy. Law & Human Behavior, 25, pp. 185-198.
12. Hopkins, K. D. (1982) The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations. American Educational Research Journal, 19:1, pp. 5-18.
13. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. and Lindsay, D. S. (1993) Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, pp. 3-28.
14. Kenny, D. A. and La Voie, L. (1985) Interpersonal relations and group processes: Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, pp. 339-348.
15. MacLin, O. H., Meissner, C. A. and Zimmerman, L. A. (2005) PCE_Basic: A computerized framework for the administration and practical application of research in eyewitness psychology. Behavior Research Methods, 37, pp. 324-334.
16. MacLin, O. H., Zimmerman, L. A. and Malpass, R. S. (2005) PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: Computer based line-up administration. Law & Human Behavior, 29, pp. 203-321.
17. Malpass, R. S. and Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999) Measuring line-up fairness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp. S1-S7.
18. Mandler, G. (1980) Recognising: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, pp. 252-271.
19. Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F. and MacLin, O. H. (2005) Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential line-ups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33, pp. 783-792.
20. Memon, A., Hope, L., Bartlett, J. and Bull, R. (2002) Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. Memory & Cognition, 30, pp. 1219-1227.
21. Pezdek, K. and Blandon-Gitlin, I. (2005) When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 10, pp. 247-263.
22. Reyna, V. F. and Brainerd, C. J. (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning & Individual Differences, 7, pp. 1-75.
23. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S. and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2003) Eyewitness accuracy rates in police show-ups and line-up presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law & Human Behavior, 27, pp. 523-540.
24. Tredoux, C. G. (1998) Statistical inference on measures of line-up fairness. Law & Human Behavior, 22, pp. 217-237.
25. Wolfson, A. (2002) The Courier-Journal
26. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, pp. 441-517.