The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 185-198

  Hinz, Tiffany ^a   Pezdek, Kathy ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRIME; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOS ANGELES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0035321326     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005697431830     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., & McCarthy, T. T. (1994). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory & Cognition, 22, 40-54.
2. Brigham, J. C. & Cairns, D. L. (1988). The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1394-1410.
3. Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.
4. Chandler, C. C. (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events: Interference in modified recognition tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,17, 115-125.
5. Chandler, C. C., Gargano, G. J., & Holt, B. C. (2001). Witnessing postevents does not change memory traces, but can affect their retrieval. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 3-22.
6. Gorenstein, G. W. & Ellsworth, P. C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616-622.
7. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
8. Lindsay, D. S. & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
9. Lindsay, R. C. L., Nosworthy, G. J., Martin, R., & Martynuck, C. (1994). Using mugshots to find suspects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 121-130.
10. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading question and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
11. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12. Loftus, E. F. & Loftus, G. R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.
13. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of visual information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
14. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognising: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
15. Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross-modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memroy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 515-524.
16. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968).
17. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 253-271.
18. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.