When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 247-263

  Pezdek, Kathy ^a   Blandon Gitlin, Iris ^b  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; MEMORY; MEMORY DISORDER; OFFENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; WITNESS;

EID: 25444440087     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/135532505X49846     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 1-21.
2. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Howe, M. L., & Kingman, J (1990). The development of forgetting and reminiscence. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55, (3-4, Serial No. 222). Brigham, J. C. (1981). The accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? Florida Bar Journal, 55, 714-721.
3. Brigham, J. C., & Cairns, D. L. (1988). The effect of mugshot inspection on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1394-1410.
4. Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673-681.
5. Brigham, J. C., & Ready, D. J. (1985). Same-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 415-424.
6. Brigham, J. C., & WolfsKeil, M. P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349.
7. Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.
8. Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1979). Effects of interpolated mug shot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.
9. Ellis, H. D., Davies, G. M., & McMurran, M. M. (1979). Recall of White and Black faces by White and Black witnesses using the Photofit system. Human Factors, 21, 55-59.
10. Gorenstein, G. W., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616-622.
11. Hinz, T., & Pezdek, K. (2001). The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 185-198.
12. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 2-18.
13. Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, and type of photographs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
14. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
15. Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
16. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the same-race bias in memory for faces. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.
17. Memon, A., Hope, L., Bartlett, J., & Bull, R. (2002). Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1219-1227.
18. Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross-modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 515-524.
19. Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 760-763.
20. Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 116-128.
21. Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 972-984.
22. Potter, M. C., & Levy, E. I. (1969). Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 10-15.
23. Read, J. D., Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3-31.
24. Reynolds, J. K., & Pezdek, K. (1992). Face recognition memory: The effects of exposure duration and encoding instructions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 279-292.
25. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Ross, D. E, Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 918-930.
27. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
28. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968).
29. Taylor, J. K (1998). The suggestibility of memory for consistent and inconsistent information. Unpublished master's thesis, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.
30. Tversky, B., & Sherman, T. (1975). Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 114-118.
31. United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).
32. Valentine, T (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race on face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
33. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 253-271.