Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP) - A general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes

Nature Protocols

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1414-1425

  Weerapana, Eranthie ^a   Speers, Anna E ^a   Cravatt, Benjamin F ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME; REAGENT;

ARTICLE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOTIN; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MICE; MOLECULAR PROBES; MYOCARDIUM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 34250746414     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.194     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, N.L. & Anderson, N.G. Proteome and proteomics: New technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis 19 1853-1861 (1998).
2. Mann, M., Hendrickson, R.C. & Pandey, A. Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 437-473 (2001).
3. Kobe, B. & Kemp, B.E. Active site-directed protein regulation. Nature 402, 373-376 (1999).
4. Evans, M.J. & Cravatt, B.F. Mechanism-based profiling of enzyme families. Chem. Rev. 106, 3279-3301 (2006).
5. Oda, Y., Nagasu, T. & Chait, B.T. Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 379-382 (2001).
6. Zhou, H., Watts, J.D. & Aebersold, R. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 375-378 (2001).
7. Tai, H.C., Khidekel, N., Ficarro, S.B., Peters, E.C. & Hsieh-Wilson, L.C. Parallel identification of O-GLcNAc-modified proteins from cell lysates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10500-10501 (2004).
8. Vocadlo, D.J., Hang, H.C., Kim, E.J., Hanover, J.A. & Bertozzi, C.R. A chemical approach for identifying O-GLcNAc-modified proteins in cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9116-9121 (2003).
9. Adam, G.C., Sorensen, E.J. & Cravatt, B.F. Chemical strategies for functional proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 781-790 (2002).
10. Speers, A.E. & Cravatt, B.F. Chemical strategies for activity-based proteomics. Chembiochem 5, 41-47 (2004).
11. Liu, Y., Patricelli, M.P. & Cravatt, B.F. Activity-based protein profiling: The serine hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 14694-14699 (1999).
12. Kato, D. et al. Activity-based probes that target diverse cysteine protease families. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 33-38 (2005).
13. Patricelli, M.P. et al. Functional interrogation of the kinome using nucleotide acyl phosphates. Biochemistry 46, 350-358 (2007).
14. Adam, G.C., Sorensen, E.J. & Cravatt, B.F. Proteomic profiling of mechanistically distinct enzyme classes using a common chemotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 805-809 (2002).
15. Barglow, K.T. & Cravatt, B.F. Discovering disease-associated enzymes by proteome reactivity profiling. Chem. Biol. 11, 1523-31 (2004).
16. Evans, M.J., Saghatelian, A., Sorensen, E.J. & Cravatt, B.F. Target discovery in small-molecule cell-based screens by in situ proteome reactivity profiling. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1303-1307 (2005).
17. Speers, A.E., Adam, G.C. & Cravatt, B.F. Activity-based protein profiling in vivo using a copper(i)-catalyzed azide-alkyne [3 + 2] cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 4686-4687 (2003).
18. Speers, A.E. & Cravatt, B.F. Profiling enzyme activities in vivo using click chemistry methods. Chem. Biol. 11, 535-546 (2004).
19. Kolb, H.C., Finn, M.G. & Sharpless, K.B. Click chemistry: Diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40, 2004-2021 (2001).
20. Speers, A.E. & Cravatt, B.F. A tandem orthogonal proteolysis strategy for high-content chemical proteomics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10018-10019 (2005).
21. Dougherty, W.G., Cary, S.M. & Parks, T.D. Molecular genetic analysis of a plant virus polyprotein cleavage site: A model. Virology 171 356-364 (1989).
22. Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R. 3rd large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242-247 (2001).
23. Adam, G.C., Burbaum, J., Kozarich, J.W., Patricelli, M.P. & Cravatt, B.F. Mapping enzyme active sites in complex proteomes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1363-1368 (2004).
24. Okerberg, E.S. et al. High-resolution functional proteomics by active-site peptide profiling. Proc, Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 4996-5001 (2005).
25. Jessani, N. et al. A streamlined platform for high-content functional proteomics of primary human specimens. Nat. Methods 2, 691-697 (2005).
26. Liu, H., Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R. 3rd A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 4193-4201 (2004).
27. Old, W.M. et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 1487-1502 (2005).
28. Cooper, H.J., Hakansson, K. & Marshall, A.G. The role of electron capture dissociation in biomolecular analysis. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 24, 201-222 (2005).