Dual effects of sodium lauryl sulphate on human oral epithelial structure

Experimental Dermatology

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 574-579

  Neppelberg, Evelyn ^a,b   Costea, Daniela Elena ^a   Vintermyr, Olav Karsten ^b   Johannessen, Anne Christine ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cell culture; E cadherin; Epithelium; Oral mucosa; Sodiumlauryl sulphate

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 3; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; KI 67 ANTIGEN; UVOMORULIN; VERY LATE ACTIVATION ANTIGEN 6;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DEATH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; KERATINOCYTE; MORPHOMETRICS; NICK END LABELING; ORAL MUCOSAL DISEASE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; THICKNESS; TISSUE CULTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADHERINS; CELL DEATH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EPITHELIUM; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU NICK-END LABELING; KI-67 ANTIGEN; MOUTH MUCOSA; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 34250739325     PISSN: 09066705     EISSN: 16000625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00567.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Orlando R C. Review article: Oesophageal mucosal resistance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998: 12: 191-197.
2. Squier C A, Kremer M J. Biology of oral mucosa and esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001: 29: 7-15.
3. Presland R B, Jurevic R J. Making sense of the epithelial barrier: What molecular biology and genetics tell us about the functions of oral mucosal and epidermal tissues. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 564-574.
4. Gooding J M, Yap K L, Ikura M. The cadherin-catenin complex as a focal point of cell adhesion and signalling: New insights from three-dimensional structures. Bioessays 2004: 26: 497-511.
5. Watt F M. Role of integrins in regulating epidermal adhesion, growth and differentiation. EMBO J 2002: 21: 3919-3926.
6. Kuehl B L, Fyfe K S, Shear N H. Cutaneous cleansers. Skin Therapy Lett 2003: 8: 1-4.
7. Newbrun E. Dentifrices. In: Newbrun A, ed. Cariology. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989: 274-290.
8. Aramaki J, Effendy I, Happle R, Kawana S, Löffler C, Löffler H. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 286-290.
9. Jenkins S, Addy M, Newcome R. Triclosan and sodium lauryl sulphate mouthrinses. (II). Effects of 4-day plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol 1991: 18: 145-148.
10. Herlofson B B, Barkvoll P. Oral mucosal desquamation caused by two toothpaste detergents in an experimental model. Eur J Oral Sci 1996: 104: 21-26.
11. Skaare A B, Rolla G, Barkvoll P. The influence of triclosan, zinc or propylene glycol on oral mucosa exposed to sodium lauryl sulphate. Eur J Oral Sci 1997: 105: 527-533.
12. Welzel J, Metker C, Wolff H H, Wilhelm K P. SLS-irritated human skin shows no correlation between degree of proliferation and TEWL increase. Arch Dermatol Res 1998: 290: 615-620.
13. GrängsjöA, Ybo A, Roomans G M, Lindberg M. Irritant-induced keratinocyte proliferation evaluated with two different methods: immunohistochemistry and X-ray microanalysis. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 2000: 32: 11-16.
14. Babich H, Babich J P. Sodium lauryl sulfate and triclosan: In vitro cytotoxicity studies with gingival cells. Toxicol Lett 1997: 91: 189-196.
15. Roll E B, Dahl J E, Runningen G, Morisbak E. In vitro cell death induced by irradiation and chemicals relevant for dental applications; dose-response and potentiation effects. Eur J Oral Sci 2004: 112: 273-279.
16. Jakasa I, Verberk MM, Bunge AL, Kruse J, Kezic S. Increased permeability for polyethylene glycols through skin compromised by sodium lauryl sulfate. Exp Dermatol 2006: 15: 801-807.
17. Healy C M, Cruchley A T, Thornhill M H, Williams D M. The effect of sodium lauryl sulphate, triclosan and zinc on the permeability of normal oral mucosa. Oral Dis 2000: 6: 118-123.
18. Froebe C L, Simion F A, Rhein L D, Cagan R H, Klingman A. Stratum corneum lipid removal by surfactants: Relation to in vivo irritation. Dermatologica 1990: 181: 277-283.
19. Fartasch M, Schnetz E, Diepgen T L. Characterization of detergent-induced barrier alterations - effect of barrier cream on irritation. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 1998: 3: 121-127.
20. Nicolazzo J A, Reed B L, Finnin B C. Assessment of the effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the buccal permeability of caffeine and estradiol. J Pharm Sci 2004: 93: 431-440.
21. Costea D E, Loro L L, Dimba E A, Vintermyr O K, Johannessen A C. Crucial effects of fibroblasts and keratinocyte growth factor on morphogenesis of reconstituted human oral epithelium. J Invest Dermatol 2003: 121: 1479-1486.
22. Selvaratnam L, Cruchley A T, Navsaria H et al. Permeability barrier properties of oral keratinocyte cultures: A model of intact human oral mucosa. Oral Dis 2001: 7: 252-258.
23. Fakhry-Smith S, Din C, Nathoo S A, Gaffar A. Clearance of sodium lauryl sulphate from the oral cavity. J Clin Periodontol 1997: 24: 313-317.
24. Costea D E, Johannessen A C, Vintermyr O K. Fibroblast control on epithelial differentiation is gradually lost during in vitro tumor progression. Differentiation 2005: 73: 134-141.
25. Loro L L, Vintermyr O K, Ibrahim S O, Idris A M, Johannessen A C. Apoptosis and expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in snuff- and non-snuff associated oral squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res 2000: 20: 2855-2860.
26. Neppelberg E, Johannessen A C, Jonsson R. Apoptosis in oral lichen planus. Eur J Oral Sci 2001: 109: 361-364.
27. Bloom E, Sznitowska M, Polansky J, Ma Z D, Maibach H I. Increased proliferation of skin cells by sublethal doses of sodium lauryl sulfate. Dermatology 1994: 188: 263-268.
28. Downer C S, Speight P M. E-cadherin expression in normal, hyperplastic and malignant oral epithelium. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1993: 29: 303-305.
29. Hermiston M L, Gordon J I. Inflammatory bowel disease and adenomas in mice expressing a dominant negative N-cadherin. Science 1995: 270: 1203-1207.
30. Tunggal J A, Helfrich I, Schmitz A et al. E-cadherin is essential for in vivo epidermal barrier function by regulating tight junctions. EMBO J 2005: 24: 1146-1156.