Dynamic coupling between heart rate and ventricular repolarisation

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 255-263

  Halámek, Josef ^a   Jurák, Pavel ^a   Villa, Marco ^b   Souček, Miroslav ^c   Fráňa, Petr ^c   Nykodým, Jiri ^d   Eisenberger, Martin ^c   Leinveber, Pavel ^d   Vondra, Vlastimil ^a   Somers, Virend K ^d   Kara, Tomas ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

^c ST ANNE S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Czech Republic)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

QT RR coupling; Transfer function

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; HEALTH RISKS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

ARRHYTHMOGENIC RISKS; HEART RATE; STATIC MODELS; VENTRICULAR REPOLARIZATION;

CARDIOLOGY;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BREATHING RATE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEART CONDUCTION; HEART RATE; HEART REPOLARIZATION; HEART VENTRICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STEADY STATE; VOLUNTEER;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HEART RATE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 34250323523     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2007.044     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahnve S. Correction of the QT interval for heart rate: review of different formulas and the use of Bazett's formula in myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1985; 109: 568-574.
2. Almeida R, Gouveia S, Rocha AP, Pueyo E, Martinez JP, Laguna P. QT variability and HRV interactions in ECG: Quantification and Reliability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 1317-1329.
3. Badilini F, Blanche PM, Childers R, Coumel P. QT interval analysis on ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings: a selective beat averaging approach. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37: 71-79.
4. Batchvarov VN, Ghuran A. Smetana P, et al. QT-RR relationship in healthy subjects exhibits substantial intersubject variability and high intrasubject stability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 282: H2356-H2363.
5. Bazett JC. An analysis of time relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920; 7: 353-370.
6. Benatar T, Decraene T. Comparison of formulae for heart rate correction of QT interval in exercise ECGs from healthy children. Heart 2001; 86: 199-202.
7. Berger DE, Kasper EK, Baughman KL, Marban E, Calkins H, Tomaselli GF. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability. Circulation 1997; 96: 1557-1565.
8. Fossa AA, Wisialowski T, Magnano A, et al. Dynamic beat-to-beat modeling of the QT-RR interval relationship: analysis of QT prolongation during alterations of autonomic state versus human ether a-go-go-related gene inhibition. J Pharmacol Exp 2005; 312: 1-11.
9. Haverkamp W, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, et al. The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1216-1231.
10. Huysduyen BH, Swenne CA, Eck HJ, et al. Hypertensive stress increases dispersion of repolarization. Pace 2004; 27: 1603-1609.
11. Jurák J, Halámek J, Somers VK, M. Eisenberger, et al. QT interval detection and verification methods. In: Proceedings of the IMEKO TC-4 Symposium, 2004: 443-447.
12. Kawataki M, Kashima T, Toda H, Tanaka H. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. Application and limitation of Bazett's formula. J Electrocardiol 1984; 17: 371-375.
13. Lande G, Kyndt F, Baro I, et al. Dynamic analysis of QT interval in long QT1 syndrome patients with a normal phenotype. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 410-422.
14. Lande G, Brentano CHF, Ghandarfar M, Escande D. Steady-state versus non-steady-state QT-RR relationship in 24-hour Holter recordings. Pace 2000; 23: 293-302.
15. Malik M, Farbom P, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, Comm AJ. Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval. Heart 2002; 87: 220-228.
16. Moss AJ, Robinson JL. The long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2002; 105: 784-786.
17. Noda T, Shimizu W, Satomi K, et al. Classification and mechanism of Torsade de Pointes initiation in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 2149-2154.
18. Ott P, Marcus FI, Moss AJ. Ventricular fibrillation during swimming in a patient with long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2002; 106: 521-522.
19. Padrini R, Sperenza G, Nollo G, et al. Adaptation of the QT interval to heart rate changes in isolated perfused guinea pig heart: influence of amiodarone and d-sotanol. Pharmacol Res 1997; 35: 409-416.
20. Pathak A, Curnier D, Fourcade J, et al. QT dynamicity: a prognostic factor for sudden cardiac death in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005; 7: 269-275.
21. Porta A, Baselli G, Caiani E, Maliani A, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Quantifying electrocardiogram RT-RR variability interactions. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998; 36: 27-34.
22. Pudu PE, Crintini A, Monti F. Screening for drug-induced (acquired) long QT syndrome: is it time to apply new methods? Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 363-369.
23. Pueyo E, Smetana P, Caminal P, Luna AB, Malik M, Laguna P. Characterization of QT interval adaptation to RR interval changes and its use as a risk-stratifier of arrhythmic mortality in amiodarone-treated survivors of acute myocardial infarction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 1511-1520.
24. Yap YG, Camm AJ. Drug induced QT prolongation and Torsade de Pointes. Heart 2003; 89: 1363-1372.