A research note on the incremental validity of job knowledge and integrity tests for predicting maximal performance

Human Performance

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 293-303

  Ones, Deniz S ^a   Viswesvaran, Chockalingam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250210665     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959280701333461     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivations and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561-589.
2. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., Pulakos, E. D., & Oppler, S. H. (1991). Models of supervisory job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 863-872.
3. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
4. Campbell, J. P., & Knapp, D. J. (Eds.). (2001). Exploring the limits in personnel selection and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, K. H., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325-352.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Harper.
7. Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36.
8. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
9. DuBois, C L., Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.
10. Gough, H. G. (1954). Personnel Reaction Blank. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11. Gough, H. G. (1971). The assessment of wayward impulse by means of the Personnel Reaction Blank. Personnel Psychology, 24, 669-677.
12. Gough, H. G., Arvey, R. D., & Bradley, P. (2004). Manual for the Personnel Reaction Blank. Champaign, IL: IPAT.
13. Hough, L. M. (1990). Personnel Reaction Blank (1988 edition). In J. Hogan & R. Hogan (Eds.), Business and industry testing (pp. 434-440). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternate predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
15. Kirk, A. K., & Brown, D. F. (2003). Latent constructs of proximal and distal motivation predicting performance under maximum test conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 40-49.
16. Klehe, U., & Anderson, N. (2005). The prediction of typical and maxim um performance in employee selection. In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Voskuijl (Eds.), Handbook of personnel selection (pp. 331-353). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Klehe, U., & Latham, G. (2003, April). Towards an understanding of the constructs underlying situational and patterned behavior description interviews in predicting typical versus maximal performance. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
18. McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493-505.
19. Ones, D. S. (1993). The construct validity of Integrity tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
20. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C (1998). Integrity testing in organizations. In S. B. Baracharach, A. O'Leary-Kelly, J. M. Collins, & R. W Griffin (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior (pp. 243-276). Stanford, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
21. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005a). Cognitive ability in personnel selection decisions. In A. Evers, O. Voskuijl, & N. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of selection (pp. 143-173). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005b). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.
23. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
24. Ployhart, R., Lim, B., & Chan, K. (2001). Exploring relations between typical and maximal performance ratings and the five-factor model of personality, Personnel Psychology, 54, 809-843.
25. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482-486.
26. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
27. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439.
28. Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627-670.
29. Schmitt, N., Rogers, W., Chan, D., Sheppard, L., & Jennings, D. (1997). Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 719-730.
30. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1997). A review of the Personnel Reaction Blank (PRB). Security Journal, 8, 129-132.