Cue- versus response-locked processes in backward inhibition: Evidence from ERPs

Psychophysiology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 596-609

  Sinai, Marco ^a   Goffaux, Philippe ^a   Phillips, Natalie A ^a,b  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Backward inhibition; Event related brain potentials; Lateralized readiness potentials (LRP); Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34250208060     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A. Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421 452). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
2. Allport, A. Wylie, G. (2000). 'Task switching', stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35 70). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
3. Arbuthnott, K. D. Frank, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33 41.
4. Arbuthnott, K. D. Woodward, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue-task associations and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18 29.
5. Barcelo, F., Munoz-Cespedes, J. M., Pozo, M. A. Rubia, F. J. (2000). Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin card sorting test. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1342 1355.
6. Brass, M. von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 609 620.
7. Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R. Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713 726.
8. Bunge, S. A., Hazeltine, E., Scanlon, M. D., Rosen, A. C. Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Dissociable contribution of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage, 17, 1562 1571.
9. Coles, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251 269.
10. Corbetta, M. Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201 215.
11. de Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G. Mulder, L. J. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682 692.
12. Donchin, E. Coles, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357 427.
13. Dove, A., Pollmann, S., Schubert, T., Wiggins, C. J. von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 103 109.
14. Dreher, J. C. Berman, K. F. (2002). Fractionating the neural substrate of cognitive control processes. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 29, 14595 14600.
15. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H. Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468 483.
16. Falkenstein, M., Yordanova, J. Kolev, V. (2006). Effects of aging on motor-response generation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 59, 22 29.
17. Gade, M. Koch, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530 535.
18. Gilbert, S. J. Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297 337.
19. Goffaux, P., Phillips, N. A., Sinai, M. Pushkar, D. (2006). Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of task switching during single and mixed-task conditions. Biological Psychology, 72, 278 290.
20. Guthrie, D. Buchwald, J. S. (1991). Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 240 244.
21. Houghton, G. Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53 112). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
22. Hubner, M., Dreisbach, G., Haider, H. Kluwe, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 289 297.
23. Karayanidis, F., Coltheart, M., Michie, P. T. Murphy, K. (2003). Electropsychological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology, 40, 329 348.
24. Kieffaber, P. Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology, 42, 56 71.
25. Koch, I., Gade, M. Philipp, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 52 58.
26. Koch, I., Philipp, A. M. Gade, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346 350.
27. Kray, J., Eppinger, B. Mecklinger, A. (2005). Age differences in attentional control: An event-related potential approach. Psychophysiology, 42, 407 416.
28. Lorist, M. M., Klein, M., Nieuwenhuis, S., De Jong, R., Mulder, G. Meijman, T. F. (2000). Mental fatigue and task control: Planning and preparation. Psychophysiology, 37, 1 12.
29. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96 109.
30. Mayr, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93 99.
31. Mayr, U. Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4 26.
32. Mayr, U. Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124 1140.
33. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423 1442.
34. Meiran, N. (2000). The reconfiguration of the stimulus task-set and the response task-set during task switching. In S. Monsell J. S. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377 400). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
35. Mordkoff, J. T. Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347 360.
36. Moulden, D. J. A., Picton, T. W., Meiran, N., Stuss, D. T., Riera, J. J. Valdes Sosa, P. (1998). Event-related potentials when switching attention between task-sets. Brain & Cognition, 37, 186 190.
37. Näätänen, R. Picton, T. W. (1986). N2 and automatic vs. controlled processes. In W. C. McCallum, R. Zappoli F. Denoth (Eds.), Cerebral psychophysiology: Studies in event related potentials (pp. 169 186, EEG Suppl. 38). Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers.
38. Neuroscan, Inc. (2003). Scan 4.3: Edit 4.3 Manual, Vol 2. El Paso, TX : Compumedics Neuroscan.
39. Phillips, N. A., Poulsen, C. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Event-related brain potential measures of task set switching. Psychophysiology, 37, S79.
40. Poulsen, C., Luu, P., Davey, C. Tucker, D. (2005). Dynamics of task sets: Evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 133 154.
41. Poulsen, C., Luu, P., Tucker, D., Speiser, A., Segalowitz, N., Phillips, N. A., et al 2001). Do task switching and inhibition recruit distinct control mechanisms? Evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Poster presented at the Banff Annual Seminar in Cognitive Science, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
42. Renault, B., Ragot, R., Lesevre, N. Remond, A. (1982). Onset and offset of brain events as indices of mental chronometry. Science, 215, 1413 1415.
43. Rogers, R. D. Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207 231.
44. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, E. D. Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763 797.
45. Rushworth, M. F. S., Passingham, R. E. Nobre, A. C. (2002). Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1139 1150.
46. Schuch, S. Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92 105.
47. Sohn, M. H., Ursu, S., Anderson, J. R., Stenger, V. A. Carter, C. S. (2000). The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 13448 13453.
48. Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. New York : Oxford University Press.
49. Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., Jackson, G. M., Rorden, C., Peters, A. M., Morris, P. G., et al 2003). Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from repeated task-switching. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 785 799.
50. Tieges, Z., Snel, J., Kok, A., Wijnen, J. G., Lorist, M. M. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching. Biological Psychology, 73, 101 113.
51. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
52. West, R. (2004). The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 103 113.
53. Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C. Foxe, J. J. (2004). Don't think of a white bear: An fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task switching paradigm. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 279 297.