-
3
-
-
0035980287
-
-
Stoll M.E., Belanzoni P., Calhorda M.J., Drew M.G.B., Félix V., Geiger W.E., Gamelas C.A., Gonçlaves I.S., Romão C.C., and Veiros L.F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 10595
-
(2001)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.123
, pp. 10595
-
-
Stoll, M.E.1
Belanzoni, P.2
Calhorda, M.J.3
Drew, M.G.B.4
Félix, V.5
Geiger, W.E.6
Gamelas, C.A.7
Gonçlaves, I.S.8
Romão, C.C.9
Veiros, L.F.10
-
4
-
-
23744495844
-
-
Reingold J.A., Virkaitis K.L., Carpenter G.B., Sun S., and Sweigart D.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 11146
-
(2005)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.127
, pp. 11146
-
-
Reingold, J.A.1
Virkaitis, K.L.2
Carpenter, G.B.3
Sun, S.4
Sweigart, D.A.5
-
5
-
-
30344458828
-
-
Garg A., Nemer D.M., Choi H., Sheridan J.B., and Geiger W.E. Organometallics 25 (2006) 275
-
(2006)
Organometallics
, vol.25
, pp. 275
-
-
Garg, A.1
Nemer, D.M.2
Choi, H.3
Sheridan, J.B.4
Geiger, W.E.5
-
6
-
-
0003062769
-
-
Connelly N.G., Emslie D.J.H., Metz B., Orpen A.G., and Quayle M.J. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1996) 2289
-
(1996)
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
, pp. 2289
-
-
Connelly, N.G.1
Emslie, D.J.H.2
Metz, B.3
Orpen, A.G.4
Quayle, M.J.5
-
7
-
-
0035820159
-
-
Connelly N.G., Emslie D.J.H., Geiger W.E., Hayward O.D., Linehan E.B., Orpen A.G., Quayle M.J., and Rieger P.H. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (2001) 670
-
(2001)
J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.
, pp. 670
-
-
Connelly, N.G.1
Emslie, D.J.H.2
Geiger, W.E.3
Hayward, O.D.4
Linehan, E.B.5
Orpen, A.G.6
Quayle, M.J.7
Rieger, P.H.8
-
8
-
-
0038375413
-
-
Geiger W.E., Camire Ohrenberg N., Yeomans B., Connelly N.G., and Emslie D.J.H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 8680
-
(2003)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.125
, pp. 8680
-
-
Geiger, W.E.1
Camire Ohrenberg, N.2
Yeomans, B.3
Connelly, N.G.4
Emslie, D.J.H.5
-
10
-
-
33845553453
-
-
Laganis E.D., Voegeli R.H., Swann R.T., Finke R.G., Hopf H., and Boekelheide V. Organometallics 1 (1982) 1415
-
(1982)
Organometallics
, vol.1
, pp. 1415
-
-
Laganis, E.D.1
Voegeli, R.H.2
Swann, R.T.3
Finke, R.G.4
Hopf, H.5
Boekelheide, V.6
-
16
-
-
34250222295
-
-
note
-
2+, a compound with essentially the same size to charge ratio.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
34250213454
-
-
note
-
+ is actually second-order in complex.
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
0002092112
-
-
Gusev O.V., Ievlev M.A., Peganova T.A., Peterleitner M.G., Petrovskii P.V., Oprunenko Y.F., and Ustynyuk N.A. J. Organomet. Chem. 551 (1998) 93
-
(1998)
J. Organomet. Chem.
, vol.551
, pp. 93
-
-
Gusev, O.V.1
Ievlev, M.A.2
Peganova, T.A.3
Peterleitner, M.G.4
Petrovskii, P.V.5
Oprunenko, Y.F.6
Ustynyuk, N.A.7
-
24
-
-
34250223272
-
-
note
-
Transfer coefficients are defined using α for reductions and β(=1 - α) for oxidations. The oxidation of the Rh complex was determined to have a β value of 0.33 [1c]. Important to the present argument is the fact that redox couples in which bond making and breaking are concomitant with electron transfer generally do not have α values close to 0.5, which would imply a transition state structure midway between reactant and product. See Ref. [8, pp. 97-98], for a discussion of transfer coefficients.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
34250199947
-
-
note
-
p values were measured if the Au electrode was replaced by a Pt electrode. Freshly re-polished gold electrodes did, however, give reproducible results.
-
-
-
|