Bilingual children with specific language impairment: Theoretical and applied issues

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 551-564

  Paradis, Johanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250203262     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716407070300     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Bedore, L., & Leonard, L. (1998). Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 1185-1192.
2. Belletti, A. (1999). Italian/romance clitics: Structure and derivation. In H. van Reimsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 543-579). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruck, M. (1982). Language impaired children's performance in an additive bilingual education program. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 45-60.
6. Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, (pp.145-290). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Chillier, L., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Deonna, T., Dubé, S., et al. (2001). The acquisition of French pronouns in normal children and in children with specific language impairment. Paper presented at the Early Lexicon Acquisition Conference, Lyon, France.
8. Clark, E. (1985). The acquisition of romance, with special reference to French. In D. Slobin, (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Göllner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151-171.
10. Crago, M., Bélanger, C., & Paradis, J. (2005). Object clitic acquisition by second language learners of Quebec French: Comparisons of children with typical development and with SLI. Paper presented at the European Child Language Impairment Workshop (EUCLIDES), Royaumont, France.
11. de Villiers, J., & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267-278.
12. Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1249-1260.
13. Genesee, F., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2004). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
14. Granfeldt, J., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 333-370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Grüter, T. (2005). Teasing apart L2 and SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363-391.
16. Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of language: The debate on bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.
17. Hamann, C. (2004). Comparing the development of the nominal and the verbal functional domain in French language impairment. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 109-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Frauenfelder, U. (1996). On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 309-334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Jakubowicz, C., & Nash, L. (2001). Functional categories and syntactic operations in (Ab)normal language acquisition. Brain and Language, 77, 321-339.
20. Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gérard, Ch.-L. (1998). Determiners and citic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113-160.
21. Jakubowicz, C., & Rigaut, C. (2000). L'acquisition des clitiques nominatifs et des clitiques objets en français [The acquisition of nominative and object clitics in French]. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45, 119-158.
22. Juárez, M. (1983). Assessment and treatment of minority-language-handicapped children: The role of the monolingual speech-language pathologist. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 57-65.
23. Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Kohnert, K., Yim, D., Nett, K., Kan, P.-F., & Duran, L. (2005). Intervention with linguistically diverse preschool children: A focus on developing home language(s). Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 251-263.
25. Kohnert, K., & Windsor, J. (2004). The search for common ground: Part II. Nonlinguistic performance by linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 891-903.
26. Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Leonard, L., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M.-C., McGregor, K., & Sabbadini, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition, 2, 151-179.
28. Leonard, L., & Eyer, J. (1996). Deficits of grammatical morphology in children with specific language impairment and their implications for notions of bootstrapping. In J.-L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 233-248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L., & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 741-753.
30. Miller, C., Kail, R., Leonard, L., & Tomblin, B. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 416-433.
31. Paradis, J. (2004). On the relevance of specific language impairment to understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 67-82.
32. Paradis, J. (2007). Tense as a clinical marker in child L2 English: Comparing English language learners with and without SLI. In E. Gavruseva & B. Haznedar (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2001). The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: Evidence for an Extended Optional Default account. Language Acquisition, 9, 269-300.
34. Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2004). Comparing L2 and SLI grammars in French: Focus on DP. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 89-108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Paradis, J., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2005/2006). Domain-specific versus domain-general theories of the deficit in SLI: Object pronoun acquisition by French-English bilingual children. Language Acquisition, 13/14, 33-62.
36. Paradis, J., Crago, M, Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2000). Dual language impairment: Evidence from French-English bilingual children with SLI. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
37. Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2003). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1-15.
38. Paradis, J., Goldberg, H., & Crago, M. (2005). Distinguishing between typically-developing L2 children and L2 children with SLI: Verb diversity and tense morphology over time. Poster presented at the 5th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Barcelona.
39. Rice, M. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 63-94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Rice, M. (2004). Language growth of children with SLI and unaffected children: Timing mechanisms and linguistic distinctions. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. Smith (Eds.), BUCLD 28 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
41. Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 39, 1236-1257.
42. Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (2001). Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
43. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 1412-1431.
44. Roseberry-McKibbin, C. (1995). Distinguishing language differences. Multicultural Education, 4, 12-16.
45. Van Der Lely, H. (2003). Do heterogenous deficits require heterogeneous theories? SLI subgroups and the RDDR hypothesis. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Westernoff, F. (1991). The assessment of communication disorders in second language learners. Journal of Speech-Language Pathologist Association, 15, 73-79.
47. Wexler, K. (2003). Lennenberg's dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations. Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 11-62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.