Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: Genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 829-847

  Stevens, Michael T ^a,b   Waller, Donald M ^a   Lindroth, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspen; Compensation; Defoliation; Growth; Herbivory; Plant defense; Woody plant

Indexed keywords

COMPENSATION; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; DECIDUOUS TREE; DEFOLIATION; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENETIC VARIATION; HERBIVORY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PLANT DEFENSE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOIL NUTRIENT; TOLERANCE; WOODY PLANT;

POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

EID: 34249944273     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-006-9154-4     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Abrahamson LP, White EH, Nowak CA et al (1990) Evaluating hybrid poplar clonal growth-potential in a 3-year-old genetic selection field trial. Biomass 21:101-114
2. Agrawal AA, Gorski PM, Tallamy DW (1999a) Polymorphism in plant defense against herbivory: constitutive and induced resistance in Cucumis sativus. J Chem Ecol 25:2285-2304
3. Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ (1999b) Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093-1104
4. Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Johnson MTJ et al (2002) Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 56:2206-2213
5. Anttonen S, Piispanen R, Ovaska J et al (2002) Effects of defoliation on growth, biomass allocation, and wood properties of Betula pendula clones grown at different nutrient levels. Can J For Res 32:498-508
6. Arendt JD (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Q Rev Biol 72:149-177
7. Ayres MP, Clausen TP, MacLean SF Jr et al (1997) Diversity of structure and antiherbivore activity in condensed tannins. Ecology 78:1696-1712
8. Bach CE (1994) Effects of herbivory and genotype on growth and survivorship of sand-dune willow (Salix cordata). Ecol Entomol 19:303-309
9. Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Rehill BJ et al (2004) Beavers as molecular geneticists: a genetic basis to the foraging of an ecosystem engineer. Ecology 85:603-608
10. Belsky AJ, Carson WP, Jensen CL et al (1993) Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol Ecol 7:109-121
11. Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat 148:536-558
12. Boege K (2005) Influence of plant ontogeny on compensation to leaf damage. Am J Bot 92:1632-1640
13. Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357-368
14. Byington TS, Gottschalk KW, McGraw JB (1994) Within-population variation in response of red oak seedlings to herbivory by gypsy moth larvae. Am Midl Nat 132:328-339
15. Dangerfield JM, Modukanele B (1996) Overcompensation by Acacia erubescens in response to simulated browsing. J Trop Ecol 12:905-908
16. de Jong TJ, van der Meijden E (2000) On the correlation between allocation to defence and regrowth in plants. Oikos 88:503-508
17. Del-Val E, Dirzo R (2003) Does ontogeny cause changes in the defensive strategies of the myrmecophyte Cecropia peltata? Plant Ecol 169:35-41
18. Donaldson JR (2005) Benefits and costs of phytochemical defense in aspen-insect interactions: causes and consequences of phytochemical variation. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison
19. Donaldson JR, Stevens MT, Barnhill HR et al (2006) Age-related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). J Chem Ecol 32:1415-1429
20. Falconer DS (1985) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London
21. Feeny PP (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv Phytochem 10:1-40
22. Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517-520
23. Fornoni J, Núñez-Farfán J, Valverde PL et al (2004a) Evolution of mixed strategies of plant defense allocation against natural enemies. Evolution 58:1685-1695
24. Fornoni J, Valverde PL, Núñez-Farfán J (2004b) Population variation in the cost and benefit of tolerance and resistance against herbivory in Datura stramonium. Evolution 58:1696-1704
25. Fritz RS, Simms EL (1992) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
26. Gulmon SL, Mooney HA (1986) Costs of defense and their effects of plant productivity. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Haukioja E, Koricheva J (2000) Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evol Ecol 14:551-562
28. Havill NP, Raffa KF (1999) Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus: impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior. Oecologia 120:295-303
29. Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001) The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82:2045-2058
30. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (1995) Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103:79-88
31. Hemming JDC, Lindroth RL (2000) Effects of phenolic glycosides and protein on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) performance and detoxication activities. Environ Entomol 29:1108-1115
32. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283-335
33. Hochwender CG, Marquis RJ, Stowe KA (2000) The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 122:361-370
34. Honkanen T, Jormalainen V (2005) Genotypic variation in tolerance and resistance to fouling in the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Oecologia 144:196-205
35. Houle G, Simard G (1996) Additive effects of genotype, nutrient availability and type of tissue damage on the compensatory response of Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia to simulated herbivory. Oecologia 107:373-378
36. Hwang S-Y, Lindroth RL (1997) Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 111:99-108
37. Hwang S-Y, Lindroth RL (1998) Consequences of clonal variation in aspen phytochemistry for late season folivores. Ecoscience 5:508-516
38. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
39. Katjiua MLJ, Ward D (2006) Resistance and tolerance of Terminalia sericea trees to simulated herbivore damage under different soil nutrient and moisture conditions. J Chem Ecol 32:1431-1443
40. Koricheva J (1999) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plant allelochemistry: problems with the use of concentrations. Oecologia 119:467-473
41. Koricheva J (2002) Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology 83:176-190
42. Körner C (1994) Biomass fractionation in plants: a reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In: Roy J, Garnier E (eds) A whole plant perspective on carbon-nitrogen interactions. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague
43. Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1-9
44. Lennartsson T, Tuomi J, Nilsson P (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am Nat 149:1147-1155
45. Lindroth RL, Hemming JDC (1990) Responses of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to tremulacin, an aspen phenolic glycoside. Environ Entomol 19:842-847
46. Lindroth RL, Koss PA (1996) Preservation of Salicaceae leaves for phytochemical analyses: further assessment. J Chem Ecol 22:765-771
47. 2: productivity, phytochemistry and insect performance. Ecology 74:763-777
48. Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. Am Nat 134:1-19
49. Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP et al (eds) Mattson WJ, Herms DA, Witter JA et al (1991) Woody plant grazing systems: North American outbreak folivores and their host plants. In: Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP et al (eds) Forest insect guilds: patterns of interaction with host trees. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-153, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA
50. Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301-1311
51. Mutikainen P, Walls M, Ovaska J et al (2002) Costs of herbivore resistance in clonal saplings of Betula pendula. Oecologia 133:364-371
52. Osier TL, Lindroth RL (2001) Effects of genotype, nutrient availability, and defoliation on aspen phytochemistry and insect performance. J Chem Ecol 27:1289-1313
53. Osier TL, Lindroth RL (2004) Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance. Oecologia 139:55-65
54. Osier TL, Lindroth RL (2006) Genotype and environment determine allocation to and costs of resistance in quaking aspen. Oecologia 148:293-303
55. Parry D, Herms DA, Mattson WJ (2003) Responses of an insect folivore and its parasitoids to multiyear experimental defoliation of aspen. Ecology 84:1768-1783
56. 2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595-607
57. Porter LJ, Hrstich LN, Chan BG (1986) The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25:223-230
58. Prittinen K, Pusenius J, Koivunoro K et al (2003) Genotypic variation in growth and resistance to insect herbivory in silver birch (Betula pendula) seedlings. Oecologia 137:572-577
59. Purrington CB (2000) Costs of resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:305-308
60. Puustinen S, Koskela T, Mutikainen P (2004) Direct and ecological costs of resistance and tolerance in the stinging nettle. Oecologia 139:76-82
61. Relyea RA (2002) Costs of phenotypic plasticity. Am Nat 159:272-282
62. Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic press, Inc., New York
63. Robison DJ, Raffa KF (1994) Characterization of hybrid poplar clones for resistance to the forest tent caterpillar. For Sci 40:686-714
64. Robison DJ, Raffa KF (1997) Effects of constitutive and inducible traits of hybrid poplars on forest tent caterpillar feeding and population ecology. For Sci 43:252-267
65. Roy BA, Kirchner JW (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54:51-63
66. Ruuhola TM, Sipura M, Nousiainen O et al (2001) Systemic induction of salicylates in Salix myrsinifolia (Salisb.). Ann Bot 88:483-497
67. SAS Institute Inc. (2001) JMP start statistics, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA
68. Shen CS, Bach CE (1997) Genetic variation in resistance and tolerance to insect herbivory in Salix cordata. Ecol Entomol 22:335-342
69. Siemens DH, Lischke H, Maggiulli N et al (2003) Cost of resistance and tolerance under competition: the defense-stress benefit hypothesis. Evol Ecol 17:247-263
70. Simms EL (1992) Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
71. Stevens MT (2005) Plant defense against herbivores: resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison
72. Stevens MT, Lindroth RL (2005) Induced resistance in the indeterminate growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides). Oecologia 145:298-306
73. Stinchcombe JR (2002) Environmental dependency in the expression of costs of tolerance to deer herbivory. Evolution 56:1063-1067
74. Stinchcombe JR (2005) SAS macro for correcting for the artifactual covariance between a mean and a plasticity calculated as the difference between means. Available from the author
75. Stowe KA (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703-712
76. Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG et al (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:565-595
77. Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179-185
78. Strauss SY, Watson W, Allen MT (2003) Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84:2074-2082
79. Tiffin P (2000) Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am Nat 155:128-138
80. Tiffin P (2002) Competition and time of damage affect the pattern of selection acting on plant defense against herbivores. Ecology 83:1981-1990
81. Tiffin P, Rausher MD (1999) Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am Nat 154:700-716
82. van der Meijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355-363
83. Weinig C, Stinchcombe JR, Schmitt J (2003) Evolutionary genetics of resistance and tolerance to natural herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 57:1270-1280
84. Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2005) Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109:417-428
85. Wright JW (1976) Introduction to forest genetics. Academic, New York
86. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago