Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 3790-3801

  Ménard, Lucie ^a,c   Polak, Marek ^b   Denny, Margaret ^c   Burton, Ellen ^d,e   Lane, Harlan ^c,f   Matthies, Melanie L ^c,g   Marrone, Nicole ^c,g   Perkell, Joseph S ^c,g   Tiede, Mark ^c,h   Vick, Jennell ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e Maryland Association of County Health Officers   (United States)

^f NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; HANDICAPPED PERSONS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

AUDITORY FEEDBACK; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; VOWELS;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; VOWEL;

ADULT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEEDBACK; HEARING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REFERENCE VALUES; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPEECH;

EID: 34249910057     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2710963     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Buechner, A., Frohne-Buechner, C., Stoever, T., Gaertner, L., Battmer, R. D., and Lenarz, T. (2005). " Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with Advanced Bionics' high-resolution mode., " Otol. Neurotol. 26, 941-947.
2. Chen, F. R. (1980). " Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech., " Master's project, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
3. Economou, A., Tartter, V., Chute, P., and Hellman, S. (1992). " Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 1310-1323.
4. Ferguson, S. H., and Kewley-Port, D. (2002). " Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 259-271.
5. Guenther, F. H. (1995). " Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production., " Psychoanal. Rev. 102, 594-621.
6. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., and Johnson, D. (1998). " A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements., " Psychoanal. Rev. 105, 611-633.
7. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., and Tourville, J. A. (2006). " Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production., " Brain Lang 96, 280-301.
8. Krause, J. C., and Braida, L. D. (2004). " Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 362-378.
9. Lane, H., Matthies, M., Denny, M., Guenther, F., Perkell, J., Stockmann, E., Tiede, M., Vick, J., and Zandipour, M. (2007). " Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts., " J. Speech, Lang. and Hear. Res. (in press).
10. Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F., Matthies, M., Menard, L., Perkell, J., Stockman, E., Tiede, M., Vick, J., and Zandipour, M. (2005). " Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 1636-1646.
11. Lane, H., Matthies, M., Perkell, J., Vick, J., and Zandipour, M. (2001). " The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 552-563.
12. Lane, H., Wozniak, J., Matthies, M., Svirsky, M., and Perkell, J. (1995). " Phonemic resetting vs. postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 3096-3106.
13. Langereis, M. C., Bosman, A. J., Van Olphen, A. F., and Smoorenburg, G. F. (1998). " Changes in speech production in post-linguistically deafened adults after cochlear implantation., " Clin. Otolaryngol. 23, 383.
14. Lindblom, B. (1990). " Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H is theory., " in Speech Production and Speech Modeling, edited by, W. J. Hardcastle, and, A. Marchal, (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 403-439.
15. Liu, S., Rio, E. D., Bradlow, A. R., and Zeng, F.-G. (2004). " Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2374-2383.
16. Moon, S.-J. (1991). " An acoustic and perceptual study of undershoot in clear and citation-form speech., " Phonetic Experimental Research at the Institute of Linguistics University of Stockholm XIV, University of Stockholm, Institute of Linguistics, 153-156.
17. Moon, S.-J., and Lindblom, B. (1994). " Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 40-55.
18. Muller, J., Schon, F., and Helms, J. (2002). " Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 4040+ cochlear implant system., " Ear Hear. 23, 198-206.
19. Payton, K. L., Uchanski, R. M., and Braida, L. D. (1994). " Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1581-1592.
20. Perkell, J. S., Denny, M., Lane, H., Guenther, F. H., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., Vick, J., Zandipour, M., and Burton, E. (2007). " Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 505-518.
21. Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Stockmann, E., Tiede, M., and Zandipour, M. (2004a). " The distinctness of speakers' productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2338-2344.
22. Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., Lane, H., Zandipour, M., Marrone, N., Stockmann, E., and Guenther, F. H. (2004b). The distinctness of speakers' /s/-/∫/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect., J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1259-1269.
23. Perkell, J., Numa, W., Vick, J., Lane, H., Balkany, T., and Gould, J. (2001). " Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: A preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users., " Ear Hear. 22, 461-470.
24. Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M., Perrier, P., Vick, J., Wilhelms-Tricarico, R., and Zandipour, M. (2000). " A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss., " J. Phonetics 28, 233-272.
25. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., and Braida, L. D. (1986). " Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech., " J. Speech Hear. Res. 29, 434-436.
26. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., and Braida, L. D. (1985). " Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech., " J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 96-103.
27. Pickett, J. (1956). " Effects of vocal force on the intelligibility of speech sounds., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 902-905.
28. Schenk, B. S., Baumgartner, W. D., and Hamzavi, J. S. (2003). " Changes in vowel quality after cochlear implantation., " ORL 65, 184-188.
29. Smyth, V., Murdoch, B., McCormack, P., and Marshall, I. (1991). " Objective and subjective evaluation of subjects fitted with the cochlear multichannel prostheses: 3 studies., " Austral. J. Hum. Comm. Dis. 9, 31-52.
30. Svirsky, M., Lane, H., Perkell, J., and Webster, J. (1992). " Speech of cochlear implant patients: Results of a short-term auditory deprivation study., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 1284-1300.
31. Svirsky, M. A., and Tobey, E. A. (1991). " Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2895-2904.
32. Tyler, R. S., Parkinson, A. J., Woodworth, G. G., Lowder, M. W., and Gantz, B. J. (1997). " Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 508-522.
33. Vandali, A. E., Whitford, L. A., Plant, K. L., and Clark, G. M. (2000). " Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system., " Ear Hear. 21 608-624.
34. Vick, J., Lane, H., Perkell, J., Gould, J., and Zandipour, M. (2001). " Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 1257-1267.
35. Villacorta, V., Perkell, J. S., and Guenther, F. H. (2005). " Relations between speech sensorimotor adaptation and perceptual acuity., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2618-2619.