Differential effectiveness of residential versus outpatient aftercare for parolees from prison-based therapeutic community treatment programs

Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Burdon, William M ^a   Dang, Jeff ^b   Prendergast, Michael L ^a   Messina, Nena P ^a   Farabee, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; AFTERCARE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRISONER; RESIDENTIAL HOME;

ADULT; AFTERCARE; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRISONERS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 34249905608     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1747597X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-2-16     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Condelli WS Hubbard RL Relationship between time spent in treatment and client outcomes from therapeutic communities Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1994 11 1 25-33 10.1016/0740-5472(94)90061-2 8201630
2. Hubbard RL Craddock SG Flynn PM Anderson J Etheridge RM Overview of 1-year outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997 11 4 261-278 10.1037/ 0893-164X.11.4.261
3. Hubbard RL Craddock SG Anderson J Overview of 5-year follow-up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies (DATOS) Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003 25 3 125-134 10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00130-2 14670518
4. Simpson DD Joe GW Brown BS Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS) Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997 11 4 294-307 10.1037/0893-164X.11.4.294
5. Simpson DD Sells SB Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse 1982 2 7-29
6. Hubbard RL Marsden ME Rachal JV Harwood HJ Cavanaugh ER Ginzburg HM Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1989
7. Flynn PM Craddock SG Hubbard RL Anderson J Etheridge RM Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997 11 230-243 10.1037/ 0893-164X.11.4.230
8. Burdon WM Messina N Prendergast ML The California Treatment Expansion Initiative: Aftercare Participation, Recidivism, and Predictors of Outcomes Prison Journal 2004 84 1 61-80 10.1177/0032885503262455
9. Knight K Simpson DD Hiller ML Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas Prison Journal 1999 79 3 337-351
10. Martin SS Butzin CA Saum CA Inciardi JA Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare Prison Journal 1999 79 3 294-320
11. Wexler HK De Leon G Kressel D Peters J The amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes Criminal Justice and Behavior 1999 26 2 147-167 10.1177/0093854899026002001
12. Wexler HK Falkin GP Lipton DS Rosenblum AB Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails (NIDA Research Monograph 118, DHHS Pub No. [ADM] 92-1884) Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse Leukefeld CG, Tims FM 1992 156-175
13. Wexler HK Melnick G Lowe L Peters J Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California Prison Journal 1999 79 3 312-336
14. McLellan AT Hagan TA Meyers K Randall M Durell J Intensive outpatient substance abuse treatment" Comparisons with traditional outpatient treatment Journal of Addictive Diseases 1997 16 2 57-84 10.1300/ J069v16n02_05 9083825
15. Weinstein SP Gottheil E Sterling R Randomized comparison of intensive outpatient vs. individual therapy for cocaine abusers Journal of Addictive Diseases 1997 16 2 41-56 10.1300/J069v16n02_04 9083824
16. Gottheil E Weinstein SP Sterling R Lundy A Serota RD A randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of intensive outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence Psychiatric Services 1998 49 6 782-787 9634157
17. Hser YI Evans E Huang D Anglin MD Relationship between drug treatment services, retention, and outcomes Psychiatric Services 2004 55 7 767-774 10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.767 15232015
18. Alterman AI O'Brien CP McLellan AT August DS Snider EC Droba M Cornish JW Hall CP Raphaelson AH Schrade FX Effectiveness and costs of inpatient versus day hospital cocaine rehabilitation Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1994 182 3 157-163 10.1097/00005053-199403000-00005
19. Alterman AI Snider EC Cacciola JS May D Parikh G Maany I Rosenbaum PR A quasi-experimental comparison of the effectiveness of 6- versus 12-hour per week outpatient treatments for cocaine dependence Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1996 184 1 54-56 10.1097/00005053-199601000-00010
20. Avants SK Margolin A Sindelar JL Rounsaville BJ Schottenfeld R Stine S Cooney NL Rosenheck RA Li SH Kosten TR Day treatment versus enhanced standard methadone services for opioid-dependent patients: A comparison of clinical efficacy and cost American Journal of Psychiatry 1999 156 1 27-33 9892294
21. Coviello DM Alterman AI Rutherford MJ Cacciola JS McKay JR Zanis DA The effectiveness of two intensities of psychosocial treatment for cocaine dependence Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2001 61 2 145-154 10.1016/ S0376-8716(00)00136-8
22. Gastfriend DR McLellan AT Treatment matching: Theoretical basis and practical implications Medical Clinics of North America 1997 81 4 945-966 10.1016/S0025-7125(05)70557-5 9222262
23. Hser Y A referral system that matches drug users to treatment programs: Existing research and relevant issues The Journal of Drug Issues 1995 25 1 209-224
24. Friedmann PD Hendrickson DC Gerstein DR Zhang ZW The effect of matching comprehensive services to patients' needs and drug use improvement in addiction treatment Addiction 2004 99 8 962-972 10.1111/ j.1360-0443.2004.00772.x 15265093
25. Melnick G De Leon G Thomas G Kressel D A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: First report Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2001 21 3 119-1289 10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00191-X 11728785
26. Moos RH Addictive disorders in context: Principles and puzzles of effective treatment and recovery Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2003 17 1 3-12 10.1037/0893-164X.17.1.3 12665076
27. Thornton CC Gottheil E Weinstein SP Kerachsky RS Patient-treatment matching in substance abuse: Drug addiction severity Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1998 15 6 505-511 10.1016/ S0740-5472(97)00306-1 9845864
28. Ossmann J Evolution of continuing care in California. Bidder's Conference Presentation Sacramento, CA: Office of Substance Abuse, California Department of Corrections 1999
29. Broome KM Knight K Joe GW Simpson DD Evaluating the drug-abusing probationer: Clinical interview versus self-administered assessment Criminal Justice and Behavior 1996 23 4 593-606 10.1177/ 0093854896023004005
30. Knight K Simpson DD Hiller ML Screening and referral for substance abuse treatment in the criminal justice system Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues New York: Springer Publishing Leukefeld CG, Tims F, Farabee D 2002 259-376
31. Peters RH Greenbaum PE Steinberg ML Carter C Ortiz MM Fry BC Valle SK Effectiveness of screening instruments in detecting substance use disorders among prisoners Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000 18 349-358 10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00081-1 10812308
32. California State Association of Counties: California County Fact Book 2003 http://www.csac.counties.org/
33. Tabachnick BG Fidell LS Using multivariate statistics New York: Harper Collins 3 1996
34. Prendergast M Wellisch J Wong M Residential treatment for women parolees following prison drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes Prison Journal 1996 76 3 253-274
35. Prendergast ML Hall E Wexler HK Melnick G Cao Y Amity prison-based therapeutic community: Five-year outcomes Prison Journal 2004 84 1 36-60 10.1177/0032885503262454
36. Wexler HK Burdon WM Prendergast ML Maximum security therapeutic community and aftercare: First outcomes Offender Substance Abuse Report 2005 5 6 81-82 91-94
37. Taxman FS Reducing recidivism through a seamless system of care: Components of effective treatment, supervision, and transition services in the community. (Prepared for Office of National Drug Control Policy Treatment and Criminal Justice System Conference) Greenbelt, MD, University of Maryland, College Park 1998
38. California Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs: Fact Sheet: Licensing & Certification of Alcoholism or Drug Abuse Recovery or Treatment Programs http://www.adp.cahwnet.gov/abt_adp.asp#fact
39. Farabee D Knight K Final Report on the Psychometric Properties of the Inmate Pre-Release Assessment (IPASS) Los Angeles, CA: Query Research 2001
40. Buchan BJ Dennis ML Tims FM Diamond GS Cannabis use: Consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing Addiction 2002 97 Suppl 1 98-108 10.1046/j.1360-0443.97.s01.1.x 12460132
41. Chou CP Hser Y Anglin MD Pattern reliability of narcotics addicts' self-reported data: A confirmatory assessment of construct validity and consistency Substance Use and Misuse 1996 31 9 1189-1216
42. Darke S Self-report among injecting drug users: A review Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1998 51 3 253-263 10.1016/S0376-8716(98)00028-3
43. Elliot DS Huizinga D Ageton S Explaining delinquency and drug use (National Youth Survey Project, Report No. 21) Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute 1982
44. Junger-Tas J Marshall IH The self-report methodology in crime research Crime and Justice Chicago: University of Chicago Press Tonry M 1999 25 291-367 10.1086/449291
45. Thornberry TP Krohn MD Self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime Criminal Justice. (NCJ-182411) Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice 2000 4 33-83