Understanding neuroimaging

Physical Therapy

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 670-683

  Kimberley, Teresa Jacobson ^a   Lewis, Scott M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34249880432     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060149     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Goyder DG. My Battle for life: The Autobiography of a Phrenologist. London, United Kingdom; Simpkin, Marshall, and Co; 1857.
2. Berker EA, Berker AH, Smith A. Translation of Broca's 1865 report: localization of speech in the third left frontal convolution. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:1065-1072.
3. Fritsch G, Hitzig E. Über die elektrische Erregbarkeit des Grosshirns. Arch Anat Physiol Wissenschaftl. 1870;37:300-332.
4. Walsh V, Cowey A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev. 2000;1:73-79.
5. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, et al. Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working brain. Reviews of Modern Physics. 1993;65:413-497.
6. Lounasmaa OV, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Salmelin R. Information processing in the human brain: magnetoencephalographic approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:8809-8815.
7. Hari R. Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva F, eds. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:1035-1061.
8. Forss N, Hietanen M, Salonen O, Hari R. Modified activation of somatosensory cortical network in patients with right-hemisphere stroke. Brain. 1999;122:1889-1899.
9. Meinzer M, Elbert T, Wienbruch C, et al. Intensive language training enhances brain plasticity in chronic aphasia. BMC Biol. 2004;25:20.
10. Cherry SR, Phelps ME. Imaging brain function with positron emission tomography. In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, eds. Brain Mapping: The Methods. 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 2002:485-511.
11. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10:232-237.
12. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, eds. Brain Mapping: The Methods. 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 2002:255-290.
13. Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:1-16.
14. O'Reardon JP, Blumner KH, Peshek AD, et al. Long-term maintenance therapy for major depressive disorder with rTMS. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:1524-1528.
15. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681-2686.
16. Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65:353-354.
17. Siebner H, Mentschel C, Auer C, Conrad B. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has a beneficial effect on bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport. 1999;10:589-594.
18. Siebner H, Tormos JM, Ceballos-Baumann AO, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer's cramp. Neurology. 1999;52:529-537.
19. Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell JC. Arm function after stroke: neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1641-1659.
20. Buxton RB. Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
21. Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates; 2004.
22. Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T. Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
23. Ugurbil K, Ogawa S, Kim SG, et al. Imaging brain activity using nuclear spins. In: Maraviglia B, ed. Magnetic Resonance and Brain Function: Approaches From Physics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press; 1999:261-310.
24. Friedland RP, Iadecola C. On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain. Neurology. 1991;41:10-14.
25. DeYoe E, Bandettini P, Neitz J, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;54:171-187.
26. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Barrere B. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance image signals of a rat brain to changes in the cerebral venous blood oxygenation. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:205-210.
27. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001;412:150-157.
28. Logothetis NK. The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3963-3971.
29. Mukamel R, Gelbard H, Arieli A, et al. Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and fMRI in human auditory cortex. Science. 2005;309:951-954.
30. Ugurbil K, Toth L, Kim DS. How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging of brain function? Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:108-114.
31. Kim DS, Duong TQ, Kim S-G. High-resolution mapping of iso-orientation columns by fMRI. Nature. 2000;3:164-169.
32. Kim SG, Richter W, Ugurbil K. Limitations of temporal resolution in functional MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1997;37:631-636.
33. Sartori G, Umilta C. How to avoid the fallacies of cognitive subtraction in brain imaging. Brain Lang. 2000;74:191-212.
34. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125:773-788.
35. Smith SM. Overview of fMRI analysis. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:S167-S175.
36. Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002;15:870-878.
37. Cohen MS, DuBois RM. Stability, repeatability, and the expression of signal magnitude in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:33-40.
38. Cramer S, Nelles G, Benson R, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518-2527.
39. Cramer SC, Weisskoff RM, Schaechter JD, et al. Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:197-205.
40. Tamada T, Miyauchi S, Imamizu H, et al. Cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity revealed by the laterality index in tool-use learning. Neuroreport. 1999;10:325-331.
41. Park SW, Butler AJ, Cavalheiro V, et al. Changes in serial optical topography and TMS during task performance after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke: a case study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18:95-105.
42. Waldvogel D, van Gelderen P, Immisch I, et al. The variability of serial fMRI data: correlation between a visual and a motor task. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3843-3847.
43. Carey JR, Anderson KM, Kimberley TJ, et al. fMRI analysis of ankle movement tracking training in subject with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154:281-290.
44. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, et al. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154:450-460.
45. Georgopoulos AP, Whang K, Georgopoulos MA, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of visual object construction and shape discrimination: relations among task, hemispheric lateralization, and gender. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001;13:72-89.
46. Lewis SM, Jerde TA, Tzagarakis C, et al. Logarithmic transformation for high-field BOLD fMRI data. Exp Brain Res. 2005;165:447-453.
47. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York, NY: Thieme; 1988.
48. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2000;12:191-200.
49. Hajnal JV, Mayers R, Oatridge A, et al. Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:289-291.
50. Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline J-B, et al. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of interference and power. Neuroimage. 1995;4:223-235.
51. Seto E, Sela G, McIlroy WE, et al. Quantifying head motion associated with motor tasks used in fMRI. Neuroimage. 2001;14:284-297.
52. Desmond JE, Glover GH. Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2002;118:115-128.
53. Niimi R, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, et al. Eye-tracking device comparisons of three methods of magnetic resonance image series displays. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10:147-151.
54. Wittenberg GF, Bastian AJ, Dromerick AW, et al. Mirror movements complicate interpretation of cerebral activation changes during recovery from subcortical infarction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14:213-221.
55. Ellingson ML, Liebenthal E, Spanaki MV, et al. Ballistocardiogram artifact reduction in the simultaneous acquisition of auditory ERPS and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1534-1542.
56. Dai TH, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, et al. Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140:290-300.
57. Kimberley TJ, Khandekar G, Skraba LL, et al. Neural substrates of motor imagery in severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:268-277.
58. Drevets WC. Functional anatomical abnormalities in limbic and prefrontal cortical structures in major depression. Prog Brain Res. 2000;126:413-431.
59. Mayberg HS, Liotti M, Brannan SK, et al. Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:675-682.
60. Hoehn-Saric R, Lee JS, McLeod DR, Wong DF. Effect of worry on regional cerebral blood flow in nonanxious subjects. Psychiatry Res. 2005;140:259-269.
61. Wang J, Rao H, Wetmore GS, et al. Perfusion functional MRI reveals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17804-17809.
62. Beck A, Mendelson M, Mock J. Inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561-571.
63. Manoach DS, Gollub RL, Benson ES, et al. Schizophrenic subjects show aberrant fMRI activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia during working memory performance. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:99-109.
64. Rypma B, D'Esposito M. The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6558-6563.
65. Rypma B, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, et al. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage. 1999;9:216-226.
66. Nair DG, Purcott KL, Fuchs A, et al. Cortical and cerebellar activity of the human brain during imagined and executed unimanual and bimanual action sequences: a functional MRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003;15:250-260.
67. Luft AR, Skalej M, Stefanou A, et al. Comparing motion and imagery-related activation in the human cerebellum: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998; 6:105-113.
68. Niyazov DM, Butler AJ, Kadah YM, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of motor imagery, movement and coil orientation. Clin Neuropbysiol. 2005;116:1601-1610.
69. Hillary FG, Steffener J, Biswal BB, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging technology and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: guidelines for methodological and conceptual pitfalls. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:411-430.
70. Lauritzen M. Reading vascular changes in brain imaging: is dendritic calcium the key? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:77-85.