GOCE gravity field analysis in the framework of HPF: Operational software system and simulation results

European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP

Volumn , Issue SP-627, 2007, Pages 249-256

  Pail, Roland ^a   Metzler, Bernhard ^a   Lackner, Barbara ^a   Preimesberger, Thomas ^a   Höck, Eduard ^b   Schuh, Wolf Dieter ^c   Alkathib, Hamza ^c   Boxhammer, Christian ^c   Siemes, Christian ^c   Wermuth, Martin ^d  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b Dpt of Satellite Geodesy ^*  (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPERATIONAL SOFTWARE SYSTEM; SATELLITE GRAVITY GRADIOMETRY (SGG); SCIENTIFIC PROCESSING; SYSTEM DIAGNOSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COVARIANCE MATRIX; GRAVITATION; MAGNETOMETERS; NUMERICAL METHODS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EARTH (PLANET);

EID: 34249752208     PISSN: 03796566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Badura, T. Gravity Field Analysis from Satellite Orbit Information applying the Energy Integral Approach. Dissertation, 109pp., TU Graz, 2006.
2. Badura, T., et al. Derivation of the CHAMP-only global gravity field model TUG-CHAMP04 applying the energy integral approach. Stud. geophys. geod., 50, 59-74, 2006.
3. Boxhammer, Ch. Effiziente numerische Verfahren zur sphärischen harmonischen Analyse von Satellitendaten. Dissertation, 95pp, University of Bonn, 2006.
4. Boxhammer, Ch, and Schuh, W.-D. GOCE gravity field modeling: computational aspects - free kite numbering scheme. In: Rummel et al. (eds.): Observation of the Earth System from Space, 209-224, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006.
5. De Sanctis, S, et al. Simulator Design Specification. Technical Note, GO-SP-AI-0001, Alenia Spazio, Turin, Italy, 2002.
6. European Space Agency. Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Mission. Reports for mission selection, The four candidate Earth explorer core missions, SP-1233(1), European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 1999.
7. Földvary, L., et al. Gravity Model TUM-2Sp Based on the Energy Balance Approach and Kinematic CHAMP Orbits. In: Reigber et al. (eds.), Earth Observation with CHAMP - Results from Three Years in Orbit, 13-18, Springer Verlag, 2004.
8. Klees, R., et al. Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations. J. Geod., 74, 561-571, 2000.
9. Koch, K.-R., and Kusche, J. Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J. Geod., 76, 259-268, 2002.
10. Lackner, B. Datainspection and Hypothesis Tests of very long Time Series applied to GOCE Satellite Gravity Gradiometry Data. Dissertation, 187pp, Graz University of Technology, Graz, 2006.
11. Lemoine, F.G, et al. The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1998.
12. Metzler, B., and Pail R. GOCE data processing: the Spherical Cap Regularization Approach. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 49, 441-462, 2005.
13. rd GOCE User Workshop, Frascati, November 2006, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 2006.
14. Migliaccio, R., et al. Spacewise approach to satellite gravity field determinations in the presence of coloured noise. J. Geod, 78, 304-313, 2003.
15. Pail, R. A parametric study on the impact of satellite attitude errors on GOCE gravity field recovery. J. Geod, 79, 231-241, 2005.
16. Pail, R., and Plank, G. Assessment of three numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry implemented on a parallel platform. J. Geod., 76, 462-474, 2002.
17. Pail, R., and Plank, G. GOCE Gravity Field Processing Strategy. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 48, 289-308, 2004.
18. Pail, R., and Wermuth, M. GOCE SGG and SST quick-look gravity field analysis. Advances in Geosciences, 1, 5-9, 2003.
19. Pail, R., et al. Quick-Look Gravity Field Analysis (QL-GFA). DAPC Graz, Phase Ia, Final Report, WP Ia-4.1, 107-161, Graz, 2003.
20. rd GOCE User Workshop, Frascati, November 2006, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 2006.
21. Preimesberger, T., and Pail, R. GOCE quick-look gravity solution: application of the semianalytic approach in the case of data gaps and non-repeat orbits. Studia geoph. geod., 47, 435-453, 2003.
22. Rummel, R., et al. Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Neth. Geod. Comm., Publications on Geodesy, 39, Delft, The Netherlands, 1993.
23. nd International GOCE User Workshop, Frascati, 2004.
24. Schuh, W.-D. Tailored Numerical Solution Strategies for the Global Determination of the Earth's Gravity Field, Mitteilungen geod. Inst. TU Graz, 81, Graz Univ. of Technology, Graz, 1996.
25. Schuh, W.-D. Improved modelling of SGG-data sets by advanced filter strategies. ESA-Project "From Eötvös to mGal+", Final Report, ESA/ESTEC Contract 14287/00/NL/DC, WP 2, 113-181, ESA, Noordwijk, 2002.
26. Schuh, W.-D. The processing of band-limited measurements; filtering techniques in the least squares context and in the presence of data gaps. In: Beutler et al. (eds.): Earth Gravity Field from Space - From Sensors to Earth Sciences, Space Science Reviews, 108, 67-78, 2003.
27. Schuh, W.-D., and Kargoll, B. The numerical treatment of the downward continuation problem for the gravity potential. In: Sanso (ed.): Hotine-Marussi-Symposium, IAG Symposia, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, 127, 22-31, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2004
28. st Internal GOCE User Workshop, April 2001, WP-188, 87-95, ESTEC Noordwijk, European Space Agency, 2001.
29. Sneeuw, N. A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Dissertation, DGK, Reihe C, Munich, 527, Bayerische Akademie d. Wissenschaften, Munich, 2002.