GOCE SGG and SST quick-look gravity field analysis

Advances in Geosciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 5-9

  Pail, R ^a   Wermuth, M ^b  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Colored noise; Data gaps; GOCE; Repeat orbit; Semi analytic approach

Indexed keywords

FOURIER TRANSFORM; GRAVITY FIELD; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE MISSION; TRACKING;

EID: 2542427391     PISSN: 16807340     EISSN: 16807359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-1-5-2003     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Alenia: Performance requirements and budgets for the gradiometric mission. Technical Note, GOC-TN-AI-0027, Alenia Spazio, Turin, Italy, 2001.
2. ESA: Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Mission, Reports for mission selection, The four candidate Earth explorer core missions, SP-1233(1), European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 1999.
3. Lemoine, F. G., Kenyon, S. C., Factor, J. K., Trimmer, R. G., Pavlis, N. K., Chinn, D. S., Cox, C. M., Klosko, S. M., Luthcke, S. B., Torrence, M. H., Wang, Y. M., Williamson, R. G., Pavlis, E. C., Rapp, R. H., and Olson, T. R.: The Development of the Joint NASE GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1998.
4. Pail, R.: In-orbit calibration and local gravity field continuation problem. ESA-Project,"From Eötvös to mGal+", ESA/ESTEC Contract 14287/00/NL/DC, Final Report, WP 1, 9-112, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, (www-geomatics.tu-graz.ac.at/ mggi/research/e2mgp/e2mgp.htm), 2002.
5. Pail, R. and Plank, G.: Assessment of three numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry implemented on a parallel platform, J. Geod., 76, 462-474, 2002.
6. Rapp, R., Wang, Y., and Pavlis, N.: The Ohio state 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models, OSU Report 410, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1991.
7. Rummel, R., van Gelderen, M., Koop, R., Schrama, E., Sansó, F., Brovelli, M., Miggliaccio, F., and Sacerdote, F: Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry, Neth. Geod. Comm., Publications on Geodesy, no. 39, Delft, The Netherlands, 1993.
8. Schuh, W.-D., Sünkel, H., Hausleitner, W., and Hock, E.: Refinement of Iterative Procedures for the Reduction of Spaceborne Gravimetry Data, ESA project CIGAR IV, Final report. ESA contract 152163-ESA study ESTEC/JP/95-4-137/MS/nr, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, 157-212, 1996.
9. Sneeuw, N.: A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations, Dissertation, DGK, Reihe C, Munich, no. 527, Bayerische Akademie d. Wissenschaften, Munich, 2000.