Space-wise approach to satellite gravity field determination in the presence of coloured noise

Journal of Geodesy

Volumn 78, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 304-313

  Migliaccio, F ^a   Reguzzoni, M ^a   Sansò, Fernando ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Coloured noise; Gravity field determination; Satellite gradiometry; Space wise approach; Wiener filter

Indexed keywords

GEODESY; GRAVITY FIELD; ORBITAL FORCING; SATELLITE;

EID: 10944270732     PISSN: 09497714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-004-0396-z     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Albertella A, Sansò F, Sneeuw N (1999) Band-limited functions on a bounded spherical domain: The Slepian problem on the sphere. J Geod 73:436-447
2. Albertella A, Migliaccio F, Sansò F (2001) Data gaps in finite-dimensional boundary value problems for satellite gradiometry. J Geod 75:641-646
3. Albertella A, Migliaccio F, Reguzzoni M, Sansò F (2004) Wiener filters and collocation in satellite gradiometry. In: Sansó F (ed) V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 127. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 32-38
4. Betti B, Sansò F (1989) The integrated approach to satellite geodesy. In: Sansò F, Rummel R (eds) Theory of satellite geodesy and gravity field determination, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences no. 25. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 373-416
5. Colombo OL (1979) Optimal estimation from data regularly sampled on a sphere with applications in geodesy. Rep 291, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
6. Colombo OL (1981) Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere. Rep 310, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
7. European Space Agency (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. ESA SP-1233 (1). ESA Publication Division, c/o ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
8. Jekeli C (1999) The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Celest Mech Dynam Astron 75:85-101
9. Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
10. Migliaccio F, Sansò F (1989) Data processing for the Aristoteles Mission. Proc Italian Workshop on the European Solid-Earth Mission Aristoteles, Aeritalia and MURST, Trevi, 30-31 May, pp 91-123
11. Papoulis A (1984) Signal analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York
12. Reguzzoni M (2003) From the time-wise to space-wise GOCE observables. Adv Geosci 1(1):137-142
13. Rummel R, Van Gelderen M, Koop R, Schrama E, Sansò F, Brovelli MA, Migliaccio F, Sacerdote F (1993) Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Publications on Geodesy, New Series, Number 39. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft
14. Sacerdote F, Sansò F (1985) Overdetermined boundary value problems in physical geodesy. Manuscri Geod 10(3):195-207
15. Sansò F, Tscherning CC (2003) Fast spherical collocation: Theory and examples. J Geod 77:101-112
16. Schuh WD (1996) Tailored numerical solution strategies for the global determination of the Earth's gravity field. Mitteilungen der Geodatischen Institute der TU Graz, Folge 81
17. Visser PNAM, Sneeuw N, Gerlach C (2003) Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates. J Geod 77:207-216