Temporal aspects of cue combination

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2007, Pages

  van Mierlo, Christa M ^a   Brenner, Eli ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cue combination; Neural latencies; Slant; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; BRAIN; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34249748793     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.7.8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, W. J., & Mamassian, P. (2004). Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues. Journal of Vision, 4(10):7, 921-929, http:// journalofvision.org/4/10/7/, doi:10.1167/4.10.7. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Arnold, D. H., & Clifford, C. W. (2002). Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 579-583. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Aymoz, C., & Viviani, P. (2004). Perceptual asynchronies for biological and non-biological visual events. Vision Research, 44, 1547-1563. [PubMed]
4. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2006). The temporal order of binding visual attributes. Vision Research, 46, 2280-2286. [PubMed]
5. Bresciani, J. P., Ernst, M. O., Drewing, K., Bouyer, G., Maury, V., & Kheddar, A. (2005). Feeling what you hear: Auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 172-180. [PubMed]
6. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429- 433. [PubMed]
7. Greenwald, H. S., Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2005). Integrating visual cues for motor control: A matter of time. Vision Research, 45, 1975-1989. [PubMed]
8. Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Landy, M. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science, 298, 1627-1630. [PubMed]
9. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/4/ 12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Hogervorst, M. A., & Brenner, E. (2004). Combining cues while avoiding perceptual conflicts. Perception, 33, 1155-1172. [PubMed]
11. Jacobs, R. A. (1999). Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research, 39, 3621-3629. [PubMed]
12. Knill, D. C. (1998). Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research, 38, 1683-1711. [PubMed]
13. Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539-2558. [PubMed]
14. Landy,M. S.,Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412. [PubMed]
15. Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997a). A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 264, 393-399. [PubMed] [Article]
16. Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997b). Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 264, 1407-1414. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Munhall, K. G., Gribble, P., Sacco, L., & Ward, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 351-362. [PubMed]
18. Nishida, S., & Johnston, A. (2002). Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology, 12, 359-368. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Oruc, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468. [PubMed]
20. Poom, L. (2002). Visual binding of luminance, motion and disparity edges. Vision Research, 42, 2577-2591. [PubMed]
21. Schmolesky, M. T., Wang, Y., Hanes, D. P., Thompson, K. G., Leutgeb, S., Schall, J. D., et al. (1998). Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 3272-3278. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152. [PubMed]
23. Tittle, J. S., & Braunstein, M. L. (1993). Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 157-169. [PubMed]
24. van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Gon, J. J. (1999). Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1355-1364. [PubMed] [Article]
25. Viviani, P., & Aymoz, C. (2001). Colour, form, and movement are not perceived simultaneously. Vision Research, 41, 2909-2918. [PubMed]
26. Wu, D. A., Kanai, R., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Vision: Steady-state misbinding of colour and motion. Nature, 429, 262. [PubMed]
27. Wuerger, S. M., Hofbauer, M., & Meyer, G. F. (2003). The integration of auditory and visual motion signals at threshold. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1188-1196. [PubMed]
28. Zeki, S., & Moutoussis, K. (1997). Temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems in the Mondrian world. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 264, 1415-1419. [PubMed] [Article]