Binaural interactions of electrically and acoustically evoked responses recorded from the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 309-320

  Noh, Heil ^a,c   Abbas, Paul J ^b   Miller, Charles A ^b   Nourski, Kirill V ^b   Robinson, Barbara K ^b   Jeng, Fuh Cherng ^b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Binaural interaction component; Binaural bimodal stimulation; Cochlear implants; Electric acoustic interaction; Electric acoustic stimulation; Guinea pig; Hearing aids; Inferior colliculus

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BINAURAL HEARING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; GUINEA PIG; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; GUINEA PIGS; HEARING; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34249711857     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020701212622     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbas P.J., Noh H., Jeng F.C., Miller C.A., Robinson B.K. et al. 2004. Effects of remaining hair cells on cochlear implant function. 8th Quarterly Progress Report, Neural Prosthesis Program contract N01-DC-02-1005 NIH.
2. Adams, J.C. 1979. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus. J Comp Neurol, 183, 519-538.
3. Brantberg, K., Fransson, P.A., Hansson, H. & Rosenhall, U. 1999. Measures of the binaural interaction component in human auditory brainstem response using objective detection criteria. Scand Audiol, 28, 15-26.
4. Cai, H., Carney, L.H. & Colburn, H.S. 1998. A model for binaural response properties of inferior colliculus neuron. I. A model with interaural time difference-sensitive excitatory and inhibitory inputs. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 475-493.
5. Caird, D. & Klinke, R. 1983. Processing of binaural stimuli by cat superior olivary complex neurons. Exp Brain Res, 52, 385-399.
6. Caird, D., Sontheimer, D. & Klinke, R. 1985. Intra- and extracranially recorded auditory evoked potentials in the cat. I. Source location and binaural interaction. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 61, 50-60.
7. Ching, T.Y.C., Incerti, P. & Hill, M. 2004. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25, 9-21.
8. Chmiel, R., Jerger, J., Murphy, E., Pirozzolo, F. & Tooley-Young, C. 1997. Unsuccessful use of binaural amplification by an elderly person. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 1-10.
9. Delb, W., Strauss, D.J., Hohenberg, G. & Plinkert, P.K. 2003. The binaural interaction component in children with central auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol, 42, 401-312.
10. Dobie, R.A. & Berlin, C.I. 1979. Binaural interaction in brainstem-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol, 105, 391-398.
11. Elverland, H.H. 1978. Ascending and intrinsic projections of the superior olivary complex in the cat. Exp Brain Res, 32, 117-134.
12. Firszt J.B., Gaggl W., Runge-Samuelson C. & Wackym P.A. 2003. Electrophysiologic measures of binaural interaction in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses.
13. Firszt J.B., Gaggl W., Birnbaum M., Runge-Samuelson C. & Wackym P.A. 2005. Electrophysiologic measures of binaural interaction in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Fourth International Symposium and Workshops: Objective measures in cochlear implants, Medical University of Hannover.
14. Furst, M., Levine, R.A. & McGaffigan, P.M. 1985. Click lateralization is related to the β-component of the dichotic brainstem auditory evoked potentials of human subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 78, 1644-1651.
15. Furst, M., Eyal, S. & Korezyn, A.D. 1990. Prediction of binaural click lateralization by brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res, 49, 347-359.
16. Gardi, J.N. & Berlin, C.I. 1981. Binaural interaction components. Their possible origins in guinea pig auditory brainstem response. Arch Otolaryngol, 107(3), 164-168.
17. Goldberg, J.M. & Brown, P.B. 1969. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: Some physiological mechanism of sound localization. J Neurophysiol, 32, 613-636.
18. Gopal, K.V. & Pierel, K.P. 1999. Binaural interaction component in children at risk for central auditory processing disorders. Scand Audiol, 28, 77-84.
19. Huang, C.Q. & Shepherd, R.K. 2000. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. V. Effects of electrode surface area. Hear Res, 146, 57-71.
20. Jewett, D.L. 1970. Volume conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol, 28, 609-618.
21. Kelly, J.B., Glenn, S.L. & Beaver, C.J. 1991. Sound frequency and binaural response properties of single neurons in rat inferior colliculus. Hear Res, 56, 273-280.
22. Kiang, N.Y.S. & Moxon, E.C. 1972. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann Oto Rhino Laryngol, 81, 714-731.
23. Knudsen, E.I. 1999. Mechanisms of experience-dependent plasticity in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. J Comp Physiol A, 185, 305-321.
24. Mackeith, N.W. & Coles, R.R. 1971. Binaural advantages in hearing of speech. J Laryngol Otol, 85, 213-232.
25. Marsh, R.R., Yamane, H. & Potsic, W.P. 1981. Effect of site of stimulation on the guinea pig's electrically evoked brain stem response. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 89, 125-130.
26. McPherson, D.L. & Starr, A. 1993. Binaural interaction in auditory evoked potentials: Brainstem, middle- and long-latency components. Hear Res, 66, 91-98.
27. McPherson, D.L. & Starr, A. 1995. Auditory time-intensity cues in the binaural interaction component of the auditory evoked potentials. Hear Res, 89, 162-171.
28. Miller, C.A., Abbas, P.J. & Robinson, B.K. 1994. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival. Hear Res, 78, 11-26.
29. Miller, C.A., Woodruff, K.E. & Pfingst, B.E. 1995. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures. Hear Res, 92, 85-99.
30. Miller C.A., Robinson B.K., Abbas P.J., Nourski K.V. & Jeng F.C. 2005. Effects of remaining hair cells on cochlear implant function. 12th Quarterly Progress Report, Neural Prosthesis Program contract N01-DC-02-1005 NIH.
31. Pedemonte, M., Torterolo, P. & Velluti, R.A. 1997. In vivo intracellular characteristics of inferior colliculus neurons in guinea pigs. Brain Res, 759, 24-31.
32. Pelizzone, M., Kasper, A. & Montandon, P. 1990. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res, 48, 287-290.
33. Prado-Guitierrez, P., Fewster, L.M., Heasman, J.M., McKay, C.M. & Shepherd, R.K. 2006. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival. Hear Res, 215, 47-55.
34. Rapisarda, C. & Bacchelli, B. 1997. The brain of the guinea pig in stereotaxic coordinates. Arch Sci Biol (Bologna), 61, 1-37.
35. Saito, H., Nagase, S., Fujita, H., Sato, T., Hiraide, F. & Funasaka, S. 1996. The inferior collicular potential in acoustic and electrical stimulation of the cochlea: An experimental study of guinea pig. Auris Nasus Larynx, 23, 83-90.
36. Semple, M.N. & Aitkin, L.M. 1979. Representation of sound frequency and laterality by units in the central nucleus of cat inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol, 42, 1626-1639.
37. Shipley, C., Strecker, G. & Buchwald, J.S. 1984. Binaural interaction effect on the auditory brain stem response of the cat and kitten. Brain Res, 321, 299-309.
38. Smith Z.M. & Delgutte B. 2006. Using ABR to match interaural electrode pairs with binaural cochlear implants. In: Abstracts of the 29th Annual Mid-winter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 5-9 February 2006, Baltimore, USA, Abstract #93, p.31.
39. Snyder, R.L., Rebscher, S.J., Cao, K., Leake, P.A. & Kelly, K. 1990. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central representation. Hear Res, 50, 7-34.
40. Snyder, R.L., Rebscher, S.J., Leake, P.A., Kelly, K. & Cao, K. 1991. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res, 56, 246-264.
41. Snyder, R.L., Bierer, J.A. & Middlebrooks, J.C. 2004. Tonographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 5, 305-322.
42. Strauss, D.J., Delb, W. & Plinkert, P.K. 2004. Analysis and detection of binaural interaction in auditory evoked brainstem responses by time-scale representations. Comput Biol Med, 34, 461-477.
43. Tyler, R.S., Parkinson, A.J., Wilson, B.S., Witt, S., Preece, J.P., et al. 2002. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23, 98-105.
44. Tyler, R.S., Dunn, C.C., Witt, S.A. & Preece, J.P. 2003. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 11, 388-393.
45. Ungan, P., Yagcioglu, S. & Ozmen, B. 1997. Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural difference potential in cat auditory brainstem response: Implications about the origin of the binaural interaction component. Hear Res, 106, 66-82.
46. Vollmer, M., Leake, P.A., Beitel, R.E., Rebscher, S.J. & Synder, R.L. 2005. Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Neurophysiol, 93, 3339-3355.
47. Wada, S.L. & Starr, A. 1983. Generation of auditory brain stem responses (ABRs). I. Effect of injection of a local anesthetic (procaine HCL) into the trapezoid body of guinea pigs and cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 56, 326-339.
48. Wada, S.L. & Starr, A. 1989. Anatomical bases of binaural interaction in auditory brain stem responses from guinea pig. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 72, 535-544.