Elective induction of labor: Failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 657-665

  Ray, C Le ^a   Carayol, M ^a   Breart G ^a   Goffinet, F ^a,b,c  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Elective induction; Guidelines

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NULLIPARA; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FRANCE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; LOGISTIC MODELS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OXYTOCIN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34249082127     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340701245427     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Malloy MH. Trends and characteristics of induced labor in the United States, 1989-98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16(3):263-73.
2. Elferink-Stinkens PM, Van Hemel OJ, Brand R. Differences in obstetrical intervention rates between Dutch hospitals. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;53(3):165-73.
3. Lampe LG. Indications for induction of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65(1):71-3.
4. Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(2):131-8.
5. Blondel B, Breart G, du Mazaubrun C, Badeyan G, Wcislo M, Lordier A, et al. [The perinatal situation in France. Trends between 1981 and 1995]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006;26(8):770-80.
6. Blondel B, Supernant K, Du Mazaubrun C, Breart G. Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2003: results from the National Perinatal Surveys]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006;35(4):373-87.
7. Conférence de consensus sur le déclenchement de l'accouchement. Organisé par le collège des Gynaécologues Obstétriciens Français. J Gynécol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1995;24(Supplément 1).
8. ACOG Technical Bulletin. Induction of labor. Number 217 - December 1995 (replaces No. 157, July 1991). American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;53(1):65-72.
9. Directives Cliniques de la SOGC. Le déclenchement du travail à terme. J Obstet Gynecol Canada. 2001;107.
10. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline number 9. London: ROGC Press, 2001.
11. Goffinet F, Dreyfus M, Carbonne B, Magnin G, Cabrol D. Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2003;32(7):638-46.
12. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1511-5.
13. Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(4):986-94.
14. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):628-33.
15. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(4):600-7.
16. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(2):240-4.
17. Goffinet F, Humbert R, Clerson P, Philippe HJ, Breart G, Cabrol D. National survey on the use of induced labor by obstetricians. Study Group on Induced Labour]. J Gynaecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999;28(4):319-29.
18. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Gllamm Manual. UC Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, 2004.
19. Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1690-6; discussion 1696-7.
20. Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(1):47-52.
21. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):690-7.
22. Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD001233.