Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: Literature review and role of the expert witness

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 227-241

  Crosby, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; APNEA; CANADA; CASE REPORT; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EXPERT WITNESS; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; FLUID RESUSCITATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROTOMY; LARYNGOSCOPY; LAW SUIT; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDLINE; MYOPATHY; NASOGASTRIC TUBE; NEGLIGENCE; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICIAN; POLYNEUROPATHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 34249032464     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022645     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 33-9.
2. Body DI. Civil and criminal actions against anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 83-92.
3. Ferner RE, McDowell SE. Doctors charged with manslaughter in the course of medical practice, 1795-2005: a literature review. J R Soc Med 2006; 99: 309-14.
4. Picard EI, Robertson GB. Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospital in Canada, 3rd ed. Scarborough: Carswell Publishing; 1996: 289-90.
5. Berlin L. Countersuing plaintiffs and their attorneys who have sued for malpractice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1153-6.
6. Vincent C, Young M, Phillips A. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 1994; 343: 1609-13.
7. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande A, et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2024-33.
8. Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38: 250-60.
9. Ambady N, LaPlante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W. Surgeons' tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery 2002; 132: 5-9.
10. Stelfox HT, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Gustafson ML. The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med 2005; 118: 1126-33.
11. Hickson GB, Federspiel CF, Pichert JW, Miller CS, Gauld-Jaeger J, Bost P. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA 2002; 287: 2951-7.
12. Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, et al. Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care. JAMA 1994; 272: 1583-7.
13. Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 245-51.
14. Schmidek JM, Weeks WB. Relationship between tort claims and patient incident reports in the Veterans Health Administration. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 117-22.
15. Edbril SD, Lagasse RS. Relationship between malpractice litigation and human errors. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 848-55.
16. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004; 170: 1678-86.
17. Picard EI, Robertson GB. Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospital in Canada, 3rd ed. Scarborough: Carswell Publishing; 1996: 174.
18. Samra J, Connolly DA. Legal compensability of symptoms associated with posttraumatic stress disorder: a Canadian perspective. Int J Forens Mental Health 2004; 3: 55-66.
19. Taragin MI, Willet LR, Wilczek AP, Trout R, Carson JL. The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 780-4.
20. Cheney FW, Posner K, Caplan RA, Ward RJ. Standard of care and anesthesia liability. JAMA 1989; 261: 1599-1603.
21. Brennan TA, Sox CM, Burstin HR. Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1963-7.
22. Margo CE. Peer and expert opinion and the reliability of implicit case review. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 614-8.
23. Thomas EJ, Lipsitz SR, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 812-6.
24. Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Variation in expert opinion in medical malpractice review. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 1049-54.
25. Hayward RA, Hofer TP. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. JAMA 2001; 286: 415-20.
26. Liang BA. Clinical assessment of malpractice case scenarios in an anesthesiology department. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 267-79.
27. Localio AR, Weaver SL, Landis JR, et al. Identifying adverse events caused by medical care: degree of physician agreement in a retrospective chart review. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 457-64.
28. Lomas J, Anderson G, Enkin M, Vayda E, Roberts R, MacKinnon B. The role of evidence in the consensus process. Results from a Canadian consensus exercise. JAMA 1988; 259: 3001-5.
29. Levine RD, Sugarman M, Schiler W, Weinshel S, Lebning EJ, Lagasse RS. The effect of group discussion on interrater reliability of structured peer review. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 507-15.
30. Hofer TP, Bernstein SJ, DeMonner S, Hayward RA. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality. Med Care 2000; 38: 152-61.
31. Picard EI, Robertson GB. Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 3rd ed. Scarborough: Carswell Publishing; 1996: 184-209.
32. Berlin L. Errors in judgment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1259-61.
33. Ely JW, Hartz AJ, James PA, Johnson CA. Determining the standard of care in medical malpractice: the physician's perspective. Wake Forest Law Rev 2002; 37: 861-75.
34. Meadow WL, Bell A, Sunstein CR. Statistics, not memories: what was the standard of care for administering antenatal steroids to women in preterm labor between 1985 and 2000? Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 356-62.
35. Hurwitz B. How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence? BMJ 2004; 329: 1024-8.
36. Samanta A, Samanta J, Gunn M. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference? J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 133-8.
37. Hyams AL, Brandenburg JA, Lipsitz SR, Shapiro DW, Brennan TA. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 450-5.
38. Mello MM. Of swords and shields; the role of clinical practice guidelines in medical malpractice litigation. U Penn Law Rev 2001; 149: 645-710.
39. Genuis SJ. The proliferation of clinical practice guidelines: professional development of medicine-by-numbers. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005; 18: 419-25.
40. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355: 103-6.
41. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA 1999; 281: 1900-5.
42. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317-22.
43. Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, More KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 1997; 156: 1715-23.
44. Hurwitz B. Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 661-4.
45. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? JAMA 1999; 282; 1458-65.
46. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grinshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 527-30.
47. Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA 2001; 286: 1461-7.
48. Pelly JE, Newby L, Tito F, Redman S, Adrian AM. Clinical practice guidelines before the law: sword or shield? Med J Aust 1998; 169: 330-3.
49. Rosoff AJ. Evidence-based medicine and the law: the courts confront clinical practice guidelines. J Health Polit Policy Law 2001; 26: 327-68.
50. Berlin L. Outcome bias. AJR Am J. Roentgenol 2004; 183: 557-60.
51. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Cheney FW. Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care. JAMA 1991; 265: 1957-60.
52. Morris JA Jr, Carillo Y, Jenkins JM, et al. Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 844-52.
53. Berlin L. Hindsight bias. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 597-601.
54. Fischhoff B. Hindsight not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J Exp Psychol 1975; 104: 288-99.
55. Kamin KA, Rachlinski JJ. Determining liability in hindsight. Law Hum Behav 1995; 19: 89-104.
56. LaBine SJ, LaBine G. Determinations of negligence and the hindsight bias. Law Hum Behav 1996; 20: 501-16.
57. Roese NJ, Olson JM. Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: a conceptual integration. J Exp Soc Psychol 1996; 32: 197-227.
58. Berlin L. Proximate cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 569-73.
59. Picard EI, Robertson GB. Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospital in Canada, 3rd ed. Scarborough: Carswell Publishing; 1996: 278-80.
60. Peters PG Jr. Empirical evidence and malpractice litigation. Wake Forest Law Rev 2002; 37: 757-77.
61. Gomez JC. Silencing the hired guns. Ensuring honesty in medical testimony through state legislation. J Leg Med 2005; 26: 385-99.
62. Cohen FL. The expert medical witness in legal perspective. J Leg Med 2004; 25: 185-209.
63. Resnick DB. Punishing medical experts for unethical testimony. A step in the right direction or a step too far? J Phil Sci Law 2004; 4: 1-25.
64. Feld AD, Carey WD. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond? Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 991-5.
65. Milunsky A. Lies, damned lies, and medical experts: the abrogation of responsibility by specialty organizations and a call for action. J Child Neurol 2003; 18: 413-9.
66. Berlin L. Bearing false witness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1515-21.