Evidence-based medicine and the law: The courts confront clinical practice guidelines

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 327-368

  Rosoff, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERTIFICATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COURT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; LAW; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

EID: 0035049666     PISSN: 03616878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1215/03616878-26-2-327     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Maine physician practice guidelines: Implications for medical malpractice litigation
2. The technocratic wish: Making sense and finding power in the "Managed" medical marketplace
3. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: Collision or cohesion?
4. Attacking defensive medicine through the utilization of practice parameters: Panacea or placebo for the health care movement?
5. Legal beat: Doctors' own guidelines hurt them in court
6. Medical practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability
7. Practice guidelines for medical care: The policy rationale
8. Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation?
9. Use of practice parameters as standards of care and in health care reform: A view from the American Medical Association
10. Medical practice guidelines in malpractice litigation: An early retrospective
11. In search of a standard of care for the medical profession: The "Accepted Practice" formula
12. Medical malpractice screening panels: Proposed model legislation to cure judicial ills
13. Professional liability: Maine's experiment with practice guidelines produces little evidence
14. Liability for managed care decisions: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field
15. What recourse? - Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
16. Practice guidelines and Tort reform: The legal system confronts the technocratic wish
17. Assuring the quality of medical care: The impact of outcome measurement and practice standards
18. Effectiveness in health care: An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice
19. Arbitration as a malpractice resolution alternative
20. The role of clinical practice guidelines in health care reform
21. The emerging status of practice parameters
22. The standard of care in medical malpractice claims, clinical practice guidelines, and managed care: Towards a therapeutic harmony?
23. Malpractice: The doctor's discomfort
24. Knowing and acting in medical practice: The epistemological politics of outcomes research
25. Government created medical practice guidelines: The opening of Pandora's box