Efficiency of the automatic detection of multiple auditory steady state responses measured with ROC methodology;Eficiencia de la detección automática de potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a múltiples frecuencias evaluada mediante la metodología ROC

Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 12-23

  Savio López, Guillermo ^a   Mijares Nodarse, E ^a   Perez Abalo M C ^a   Vega Hernandez, M ^a   Lage Castellanos, A ^a   Hernandez Barros D ^a  

^a CENTRO DE NEUROCIENCIAS DE CUBA   (Cuba)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem response; Automatic detection; Hearing screening; ROC curves; Signal detection methods; Steady state response

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249031796     PISSN: 02144603     EISSN: 15781712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0214-4603(07)70067-0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bacallao, J. (1997). Las curvas ROC y las medidas de detectabilidad para la validación de predictores del rendimiento docente. Educ Med Sup, 10, 12-14.
2. Cone-Wesson, B., Parker, J., Swiderski, N. Rickards, F. (2002). The auditory steady-state response: full-term and premature neonates. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 260-269.
3. Connolly, J. L., Carron, J. D. y Roark, S. D. (2005). Universal Newborn hearing screening: are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives? Laryngoscope, 115, 232-236.
4. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M. y Clarke-Pearson. D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-845.
5. Dobie, R. A. y Wilson, M. J. (1989). Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hear, 10, 2-13.
6. Dobie, R. A. y Wilson, M. J. (1993). Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol, 88, 516-524.
7. Durieux-Smith, A., Picton, T. W., Bernard, P. MacMurray, B. y Goodman, J. T. (1991). Prognostic validity of brain-stem electrical response audiometry in infants of neonatal intensive care unit. Audiology, 30, 249-265.
8. Elberling, C. y Don, M. (1984). Quality estimation of auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol, 13, 187-197.
9. Erdreich, L. S. y Lee, E. T. (1981). Use of relative operating characteristic analysis in Epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol, 114, 649-662.
10. Firszt, J. B., Gaggl, W., Runge-Samuelson, C. L., Burg, L. S. y Wackym, P. A. (2004). Auditory sensitivity in children using the auditory steady state response. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 536-540.
11. Giebel, A. (2002). Automated two-step newborn hearing screening with a combined TOEAE/ABR handled devise. Paper presented at NHS 2002. Italy,: International Conference on Newborn Hearing Screening, Diagnosis, and Intervention.
12. Gorga, M. P., Jhonson, T. A., Kaminski, J. R., Beauchaine, K. L., Garner, C. A. y Neely, S. T. (2006). Using a combination of click and tone burst-evoked auditory brainstem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds. Ear and Hearing, 27, 60-74.
13. Hurley, R. M., Hurley, A. y Berlin, C. I. (2005). Development of low frequency tone burst versus the click auditory brain-stem response. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 114-121.
14. Jacobson, J. T. y Jacobson, C. A. {1994). The effects of noise in transient OEAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 29, 235-248.
15. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., James, M., Kennalley, T., Maxon, A. B., Spivak, L., Sullivan-Mahoney, M., Vohr, B. R., Weirather, Y. y Holstrum, J. (2005). A multi-center evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two stage otoacustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics, 116, 663-672.
16. Johnson, T. A. y Brown, C. J. (2005). Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison. Ear and Hearing, 26, 559-576.
17. Kennedy, C. R., Kimm, L., Dees, D. C., Evans, P. I. P., Hunter, M., Lenton, S. y cols. (1991). Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn. Arch Dis Child, 66, 1124-1129.
18. Lin, H. C., Shu, M. T., Lee, K. S., Ho, G. M., Fu, T. Y., Bruna, S. Lin, G. (2005). Comparison of hearing of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacustic emissions (TOEAE) and two steps with TOEAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope, 115, 1957-1962.
19. Lins, O. G., Picton, T. W., Boucher, B. L., Durieux-Smith, A., Champagne, S. C., Moran, L. M. y cols. (1996). Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state response. Ear Hear, 17, 81-96.
20. Lopez, I. y Pita, S. (1998). Curvas ROC. Cad Aten Primaria, 5, 229-235.
21. Luts, H., Desloovere, C., Kumar, A., Vandermeersch, E., Wouters, J. (2004). Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 68, 915-926.
22. Luts, H., Desloovere, C. y Wouters, J. (2006). Clinical application of dichotic multiple stimulus auditory steady state responses in high risk newborns and young children. Audiology and Neurotology, 11, 24-37.
23. Mehl, A. L. y Thomson, V. (1998). Newborn hearing screening. The great omission. Pediatrics, 101, 4.
24. Norton, S. J, Gorga, M. P. y Widen, J. E. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear, 21, 508-528.
25. Oudesluys-Murphy, A. M., vanStraaten, H. L., Bholasingh, R. van Zanten, G. A. (1996). Neonatal hearing screening. Eur J Pediatr, 155, 429-435.
26. Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Savio, G., Torres, A., Martin, V., Rodriguez, E. y Galán, L. (2001). Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency specific thresholds in hearing impaired children and normal subjects. Ear Hear, 22, 200-211.
27. Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Gaya, J. A., Savio, G., Ponce de Leon, M., Perera, M. y Reigosa, V. (2005). Early detection and intervention of hearing impairment in Cuba: Outcome after 20 years, Rev Neurol, 41, 556-563.
28. Picton, T. W., Linden, R. D., Hamel, G. y Maru, J. T. (1983). Aspects of Averaging. Seminars in Hearing, 4, 324-340.
29. Picton, T. W. (1985). Concluding Comments. J Otolaryngol Suppl, 14, 54-55.
30. Picton, T. W., Vajsar, J., Rodriguez, R. y Campbell, K. B. (1987). Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 68, 119-131.
31. Rance, G., Roper, R., Symons, L., Moody, L. J., Poulis, C., Dourlay, M. y Kelly, T. (2005). Hearing threshold estimation in infants using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol,16, 291-300.
32. Savio, G., Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Valdéz, J. L., Martin, V., Sierra, C. E., Rodriguez, E. y cols. (1997). Potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable a mútiples frecuencias: Una nueva alternativa para evaluar la audición en forma objetiva. Acta de Otol & Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, 25, 87-97.
33. Savio, G., Cárdenas, J., Pérez-Abalo, M.C., González, A. y Valdés, J. (2001). The low and high frequency auditory steady state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 279-287.
34. Savio, G., Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Gaya, J., Hernández, O. y Mijares, E. (2006). Test Accuracy and prognostic validity of multiple auditory steady state responses for target hearing screening. Int J Audiol, 45, 109-120.
35. Stapells, D. R., Makeig, S. y Galambos, R. (1987). Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 67, 260-270.
36. Stapells, D. R. (2000). Frequency specific evoked potential audiometry in infants. A sound foundation through early amplification. Proceedings of an international conference. (pp. 13-31). Chicago, Illinois.
37. Swanepoel, D., Hugo, R. y Roode, R. (2004). Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 531-535.
38. Swets, J. y Pickett, R. (1982). Evaluation of diganostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press.
39. Tapia, M. C. y Savio, G. (2005). Potenciales evocados auditivos de estado estable en el estudio de dos pacientes con neuropatía auditiva. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 56, 240-245.
40. Tonini, R., Ballay, C. y Manolidis, S. (2005). Auditory steady-state response audiometry in profound SNHL: the impact of abnormal middle ear function. Ear Nose Throat J, 84, 282-288.
41. Torres, A. (2005). Desarrollo de los Potenciales Evocados Auditivos de estado estable como método objetivo para evaluar la audición residual. Tesis para optar por el grado científico de Doctor en Ciencias, Centro de Neurociencias de Cuba.
42. Valdés, M., Bobes, M., Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Perera, M., Carballo, J. A. y Valdés, P. (1987). Comparison of auditory-evoked potential detection methods using signal detection theory. Audiol, 722, 166-178.
43. Valdés, J. L., Pérez-Abalo, M. C., Martín, V., Savio, G., Sierra, C., Rodríguez, E. y cols. (1997). Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state response. Ear Hear, 18, 420-429.
44. Victor, J. D., Mast, J. (1991). A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol, 78, 378-388.
45. Vohr, B. R., Carty, L. M., Moore, P. E. y Letourneau, K. (1998). The Rode Island hearing assessment program: Experience with state wide hearing screening (1993-1996). Pediatrics, 133, 353-357.
46. White, K. R., Vohr, B. R. y Behrens, T. R. (1993). Universal new-born hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 18-29.
47. Zorowka, P.G. (1993). Otoacoustic emissions: a new method to diagnose hearing impairment in children. Eur J Pediatr, 152, 626-634.