|
|
Volumn 101, Issue 1, 1998, Pages
|
|
Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE;
EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY;
FEASIBILITY STUDY;
FEMALE;
HEARING DISORDER;
HEARING TEST;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN SCREENING;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;
UNITED STATES;
AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE;
COLORADO;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEASIBILITY STUDIES;
FEMALE;
HEARING DISORDERS;
HEARING TESTS;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
MALE;
NEONATAL SCREENING;
OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0031626842
PISSN: None
EISSN: 10984275
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.1.e4 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (379)
|
|
References (0)
|
