The maternal self in pregnant women undergoing maternal serum screening

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1180-1185

  Chiang, Hsien Hsien ^a   Chao, Yuh Mei Y ^b   Yuh, Yeong Seng ^c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

^c TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Maternal self; Maternal serum screening; Midwifery; Nurses; Prenatal nursing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONFLICT; DOWN SYNDROME; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MASS SCREENING; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TAIWAN; THERAPEUTIC ABORTION;

ABORTION, THERAPEUTIC; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL VALUES; STEREOTYPING; TAIWAN; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 34249030888     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01690.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Browner CH Press NA (1995) The normalization of prenatal diagnostic screening. In Conceiving the New World Order: the Global Politics of Reproduction Browner CH Press NA eds). University of California Press, CA, USA, pp. 307 322.
2. Cassell EJ (1991) The Nature of Suffering. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 30 47.
3. Chiang H-H, Lu ZY Wear SE (2004) To have or to be: ways of caregiving discovered during recovery from the earthquake disaster in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Ethics 31, 154 158.
4. Chiang H-H, Chao (Yu) Y-M Yuh Y-S (2006) Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down Syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 32, 273 277.
5. Chiang H-H, Yuh Y-S Chao (Yu) Y-M (2005) Explore the ethical issues in counseling for prenatal genetic test. Formosa Journal of mental health 18, 65 85.
6. Dodds S (2000) Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In Relational Autonomy Mackenzie C Stoljar N eds). Oxford University, NY, USA, pp. 213 235.
7. Earley KJ, Blanco JD, Prien S Willis D (1991) Patient attitudes toward testing for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein values when results are false-positive or true-negative. Southern Medical Journal 84, 439 442.
8. Forrest K, Simpson SA, Wilson BJ, Teijlingen ER, Mckee L, Haites N Matthews E (2003) To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics 64, 317 326.
9. Giarelli E (2003) Safeguarding being: a bioethical principle for genetic nursing care. Nursing Ethics 10, 255 325.
10. Glaser BG Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
11. Green JM (1990) Prenatal screening and diagnosis: some psychological and social issues. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 97, 1074 1076.
12. Heidrich Susan M Cranley Mecca S (1989) Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nursing Research 38, 81 84.
13. Lee JD Craft EA (2002) Protecting one's self from a stigmatized disease...once one has it. Deviant Behavior 23, 267 299.
14. Lincoln YS Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
15. Marteau TM, Cook R, Kidd J, Michael S, Johnston M, Slack J Shaw RW (1992) The psychological effects of false-positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: a prospective study. Prenatal Diagnosis 12, 205 214.
16. Mercer RT (2004) Becoming a mother versus maternal role attainment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 36, 226 232.
17. Parens E Asch A (2000) The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. In Prenatal Testing and Disability Right Parens E Asch A eds). Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 3 43.
18. Press N (2000) Assessing the expressive character of prenatal testing: the choices made or the choices made available? In Prenatal Testing and Disability Right (Parens E Asch A eds). Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 214 233.
19. Salonen R, Kurki L Lappalainen M (1996) Experience of mothers participating in maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. European Journal of Human Genetics 4, 113 119.
20. Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 23, 340.
21. Scorgie K Sobsey D (2000) Transformational outcomes associated with parenting children who have disabilities. Mental Retardation 38, 195 206.
22. Tercyak KP, Johnson SB, Roberts SF Cruz AC (2001) Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Education and Counseling 43, 73 84.
23. Van Riper M, Pridham K Ryff C (2004) Symbolic interactionalism: a perspective for understanding parent-nurse interactions following the birth of a child with Down's syndrome. Maternal Child Nursing Journal 20, 21 39.
24. Weinans M, Huijssoon A, Tymstra T, Gerrits M, Beekhuis JR Mantingh A (2000) How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down Syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis 20, 705 708.
25. Williams C (2002) Too many choices? Hospital and community stall reflect on the future of prenatal screening. Social Science & Medicine 55, 743 753.
26. Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics. Science as Culture 10, 445 481.
27. Zaner RM (2003) Ethics and the Clinical Encounter. Academical Renewal Press, OH, USA.