High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial venous system with fourfold accelerated two-dimensional sensitivity encoding

Radiology

Volumn 243, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 853-861

  Hu, Houchun H ^a   Campeau, Norbert G ^a   Huston III, John ^a   Kruger, David G ^a   Haider, Clifton R ^a   Riederer, Stephen J ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; BRAIN VEIN; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CRANIAL SINUS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOUR FOLD ACCELERATED TWO DIMENSIONAL SENSITIVITY ENCODING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; CEREBRAL VEINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA COMPRESSION; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34249027987     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2433060819     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle HP, et al. Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography. Radiology 1989;173:831-837.
2. Mattle HP, Wentz KU, Edelman RR, et al. Cerebral venography with MR. Radiology 1991;178:453-458.
3. Vogl TJ, Bergman C, Villringer A, Einhaupl K, Lissner J, Felix R. Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1191-1198.
4. Ozsvath RR, Casey SO, Lustrin ES, Alberico RA, Hassankhani A, Patel M. Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1699-1707.
5. Liauw L, van Buchem MA, Spilt A, et al. MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. Radiology 2000;214:678-682.
6. Ayanzen RH, Bird CR, Keller PJ, McCully FJ, Theobald MR, Heiserman JF. Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:74-78.
7. Pui MH. Cerebral MR venography. Clin Imaging 2004;28:85-89.
8. Fera F, Bono F, Messina D, et al. Comparison of different MR venography techniques for detecting transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 2005;252:1021-1025.
9. Dormont D, Sag K, Biondi A, Wechsler B, Marsault C, Gadolinium-enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1347-1352.
10. Prince MR, Sostman HD. MR venography: unsung and underutilized. Radiology 2003;226:630-632.
11. Liang L, Korogi Y, Sugahara T, et al. Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:481-492.
12. Lovblad KO, Schneider J, Bassetti C, et al. Fast contrast-enhanced MR whole-brain venography. Neuroradiology 2002;44:681-688.
13. Kirchhof K, Welzel T, Jansen O, Sartor K. More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques. Radiology 2002;224:804-810.
14. Wetzel SG, Law M, Lee VS, Cha S, Johnson G, Nelson K. Imaging of the intracranial venous system with a contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated examination. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1010-1018.
15. Farb RI, Scott JN, Willinsky RA, Montanera WJ, Wright GA, terBrugge KG. Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence - initial experience. Radiology 2003;226:203-209.
16. Lee JM, Jung S, Moon KS, et al. Preoperative evaluation of venous systems with 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in brain tumors: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance venography and digital subtraction angiography. Surg Neurol 2005;64:128-133.
17. Rollins N, Ison C, Reyes T, Chia J. Cerebral MR venography in children: comparison of 2D time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo techniques. Radiology 2005;233:1011-1017.
18. Bozzao A, Finocchi V, Romano A, et al. Bole of contrast-enhanced MR venography in the preoperative evaluation of parasagittal meningiomas. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1790-1796.
19. Mermuys KP, Vanhoenacker PK, Chappel P, Van Hoe L. Three-dimensional venography of the brain with a volumetric interpolated sequence. Radiology 2005;234:901-908.
20. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
21. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:671-677.
22. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. 2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI. MAGMA 2002;14:10-19.
23. van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:3-27.
24. Wilson GJ, Hoogeveen RM, Willinek WA, Muthupillai R, Maki JH. Parallel imaging in MR angiography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:169-185.
25. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J 3rd, Wald JT, Debbius JP. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:24-35.
26. Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd. Theoretical limits of spatial resolution in elliptical-centric contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:1106-1116.
27. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Chen Q, et al. Resolution enhancement in single-shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH). Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1236-1245.
28. Jaermann T, Pruessmann KP, Valavanis A, Kollias S, Boesiger P. Influence of SENSE on image properties in high-resolution single-shot echo-planar DTI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:335-342.