Left ventricle load impedance control by apical VAD can help heart recovery and patient perfusion: A numerical study

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 263-277

  Colacino, Francesco M ^a   Moscato, Francesco ^a   Piedimonte, Fabio ^b   Arabia, Maurizio ^a   Danieli, Guido A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; KALMAN FILTERS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING;

CIRCULATORY QUANTITIES; HEART RECOVERY; LEFT VENTRICLE LOAD IMPEDANCE CONTROL; PATIENT PERFUSION;

CARDIOLOGY;

AORTA PRESSURE; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; CIRCULATION; CONVALESCENCE; ENERGY TRANSFER; FILTER; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FILLING PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OVERLOAD; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PERFUSION; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; IMPEDANCE; LUNG CIRCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SIMULATION; STRESS; SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; ELASTICITY; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PULSATILE FLOW; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 34249020470     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31805b7e39     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Sezai A, Shiono M, Orime Y, et al: Comparison studies of major organ microcirculations under pulsatile- and nonpulsatile-assisted circulations. Artif Organs 20: 139-142, 1996.
2. Undar A: Myths and truths of pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support [Editorial]. Artif Organs 28: 439-443, 2004.
3. Thalmann M, Schima H, Wieselthaler G, Wolner E: Physiology of continuous blood flow in recipients of rotary cardiac assist devices. J Heart Lung Trans 24: 237-245, 2005.
4. Westaby S: Ventricular assist device as destination therapy. Surg Clin N Am 84: 91-123, 2004.
5. Farrar DJ, Holman WR, McBride LR, et al: Long-term follow-up of Thoratec ventricular assist device bridge-to-recovery patients successfully removed from support after recovery of ventricular function. J Heart Lung Trans 21: 516-521, 2002.
6. Undar A, Zapanta CM, Reibson JD, et al: Precise quantification of pressure flow waveforms of a pulsatile ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 51: 56-59, 2005.
7. Young JB: Healing the heart with ventricular assist device therapy: mechanisms of cardiac recovery. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 210-219, 2001.
8. Schmid C, Etz C, Welp H, et al: Clinical situations demanding weaning from long-term ventricular assist devices. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26: 730-735, 2004.
9. Entwistle JWC III: Short and long-term mechanical ventricular assistance towards myocardial recovery. Surg Clin N Am 84: 201-221, 2004.
10. Furukawa K, Motomura T, Nosè Y: Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: the need for an implanted right ventricular assist device. Artif Organs 29: 369-377, 2005.
11. Reesnik K, Dekker A, Van der Nagel T, et al: Physiologic- insensitive left ventricular assist predisposes right-sided circulatory failure: a pilot simulation and validation study. Artif Organs 28: 933-939, 2004.
12. Klotz S, Deng MC, Stypmann J, et al: Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 143-150, 2004.
13. Schima H, Vollkron M, Boehm H, et al: Weaning of rotary blood pump recipients after myocardial recovery: a computer study of changes in cardiac energetics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127: 1743-1750, 2004.
14. Termuhlen DF, Swartz MT, Ruzevich SA, Reedy JE, Pennington DG: Hemodynamic predictors for weaning patients from ventricular assist devices. J Biomat Appl 4: 374-390, 1990.
15. Baba A, Dobsak P, Saito I, et al: Microcirculation of the bulbar conjunctiva in the goat implanted with a total artificial heart: effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow. ASAIO J 50: 321-327, 2004.
16. Kantrowitz A: Experimental augmentation of coronary flow by retardation of the arterial pressure pulse. Surgery 34: 678-687, 1953.
17. Giridharan GA, Ewert DL, Pantalos GM, et al: Left ventricular and myocardial perfusion responses to volume unloading and afterload reduction in a computer simulation. ASAIO J 50: 512-518, 2004.
18. Glower JS, Cheng RC, Giridharan GA, et al: In vitro evaluation of control strategies for an artificial vasculature device. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE-EMBS Conference, 3773-3776. 2004. San Francisco.
19. Campbell KB, Ringo JA, Neti C, Alexander JE: Informational analysis of interaction between the left ventricle and the systemic arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 12: 209-231, 1984.
20. Sun Y, Sjoeberg BJ, Loyd D, Wranne B: Mathematical model that characterizes transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity patterns. Am J Physiol 268: H476-H489, 1995.
21. Vollkron M, Schima H, Huber L, Wieselthaler G: Interaction of the cardiovascular system with an implanted rotary assist device: simulation study with a refined computer model. Artif Organs 26: 349-359, 2002.
22. Burkhoff D, Sugiura S, Yue DT, Sagawa K: Contractility-dependent curvilinearity of end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Am J Physiol 252: H1218-H1227, 1987.
23. Shroff SG, Janicki JS, Weber KT: Evidence and quantitation of left ventricular systolic resistance. Am J Physiol 249: H358-H370, 1985.
24. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Fisiologia Medica, Xth ed. Napoli: W.B. Saunders Company, 2000:103, 106, 156-157, 223.
25. Toy S, Melbin J, Noordergraaf A: Reduced models of arterial systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32: 174-176, 1985.
26. Guyton AC, Jones CE, Coleman TG: Circulatory Physiology: Cardiac Output and its Regulation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1973:158-164, 205-221, 239-260, 469-481.
27. Guyton AC, Coleman TG, Granger HJ: Circulation: overall regulation. Annu Rev Physiol 34: 13-46, 1972.
28. Nanas JN, Moulopoulos SD: Counterpulsation: historical background, technical improvements, hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Cardiology 84: 156-167, 1994.
29. Colacino FM, Arabia M, Moscato F, Danieli GA: Modeling, analysis, and validation of a pneumatically-driven left ventricle for use in mock circulatory systems. Med Eng Physics Oct. 19, 2006 (epub ahead of print).
30. Colacino FM, Arabia M, Danieli GA, et al: Hybrid test bench for evaluation of any device related to mechanical cardiac assistance. Int J Artif Organs 28: 817-826, 2005.
31. Sagawa K, Maughan L, Suga H, Sunagawa K: Cardiac Contraction and the Pressure-Volume Relationship. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988:104, 113, 220-231.
32. Sagawa K: Analysis of the ventricular pumping capacity as a function of input and output pressure loads. Physical Bases of Circulatory Transport: Regulation and Exchange, ed. E. Reve and A.C. Guyton. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1967, p. 141.
33. Guyton AC, Douglas BH, Langston JB, Richardson TQ: Instantaneous increase in mean circulatory pressure and cardiac output at onset of muscular activity. Circ Res 11431, 1962.
34. Drews TNH, Loebe M, Jurmann MJ, Weng Y, Wendelmuth C, Hetzer R: Outpatients on mechanical circulatory support. Ann Thorac Surg 75: 780-785, 2003.
35. Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Farrar DJ, Tatooles AJ, Pappas PS: A new method of monitoring recovery and weaning the Thoratec left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 215-218, 2001.
36. Hetzer R, Muller J, Weng Y, Wallukat G, Spiegelsberger S, Loebe M: Cardiac recovery in dilated cardiomyopathy by unloading with a left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 742-749, 1999.
37. Arts T, Bovendeerd PH, Prinzen FW, Reneman RS: Relation between left ventricular cavity pressure and volume and systolic fiber stress and strain in the wall. Biophys J 59: 93-102, 1991.
38. Sugi H, Pollack GH: Ventricular pressure-volume area (PVA) accounts for cardiac energy consumption of work production and absorption. Mechanisms of work production and work absorption in muscle. S.A. Pollack, Ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1998: 491-498.
39. Suga H: Cardiac mechanics and energetics-from Emax to PVA. Front Med Biol Eng 2: 3-22, 1990.
40. Shepard RB, Simpson DC, Sharp JF: Energy equivalent pressure. Arch Surg 93: 730-740, 1966.
41. Suga H, Igarashi Y, Yamada O, Goto Y: Mechanical efficiency of the left ventricle as a function of preload, afterload, and contractility. Heart Vessels 1: 3-8, 1985.
42. Westerhof N, Elzinga G, Sipkema P: An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. J Appl Physiol 31: 776-781, 1971.
43. Gelb A: Applied Optimal Estimation. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press, 1974.
44. Wright G: Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. Ann Thorac Surg 58: 1199-1204, 1994.
45. Colson PH, Ryckwaert F, Saussine M, Ferriere M, Albat B: Monitoring weaning from BIVAD Thoratec with peak oxygen consumption. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 1808-1810, 2004.
46. Undar A, Rosenberg G, Myers JL: Major factors in the controversy of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during acute and chronic cardiac support. ASAIO J 51: 173-175, 2005.
47. Vandenberghe S. Modeling the interaction between cardiac assist devices and the left ventricle, in PhD dissertation. Ghent University: Ghent. 2004, pp. 282-292.
48. Koenig SC, Pantalos GM, Gillars KJ, Ewert DL, Litwak KN, Etoch SW: Hemodynamic and pressure-volume responses to continuous and pulsatile ventricular assist in an adult mock circulation. ASAIO J 50: 15-24, 2004.