Web-based experiment control software for research and teaching on human learning

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 689-693

  Matute, Helena ^a   Vadillo, Miguel A ^a   Bárcena, Raúl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH; TEACHING;

HUMANS; INTERNET; LEARNING; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE; TEACHING;

EID: 34249017097     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193041     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allan, L. G., Siegel, S., & Tangen, J. M. (2005). A signal detection analysis of contingency data. Learning & Behavior, 33, 250-263.
2. Arcediano, F., Matute, H., & Miller, R. R. (1997). Blocking of Pavlovian conditioning in humans. Learning & Motivation, 28, 188-199.
3. Arcediano, F., Ortega, N., & Matute, H. (1996). A behavioral preparation for the study of human Pavlovian conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 270-283.
4. Buehner, M. J., & Cheng, P. W. (1997). Causal induction: The power PC theory versus the Rescorla-Wagner model. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Sciences Society (pp. 55-60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Castro, L., Ortega, N., & Matute, H. (2002). Proactive interference in human predictive learning. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 55-68.
6. Catena, A., Maldonado, A., & Cándido, A. (1998). The effect of the frequency of judgment and the type of trials on covariation learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 481-495.
7. Cobos, P. L., López, F. J., Caño, A., Almaraz, J., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 331-346.
8. De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289-310.
9. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
10. Dieussaert, K., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2002). The quality of test context and contra-evidence as a moderating factor in the belief revision process. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 280-285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Escobar, M., Pineño, O., & Matute, H. (2002). A comparison between elemental and compound training of cues in retrospective revaluation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 228-238.
12. Gerolin, M., & Matute, H. (1999). Bidirectional associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 42-49.
13. Glautier, S. (2002). Spatial separation of target and competitor cues enhances blocking of human causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 121-135.
14. Havermans, R. C., Keuker, J., Lataster, T., & Jansen, A. (2005). Contextual control of extinguished conditioned performance in humans. Learning & Motivation, 36, 1-19.
15. Karazinov, D. M., & Boakes, R. A. (2004). Learning about cues that prevent an outcome: Conditioned inhibition and differential inhibition in human predictive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycholog y, 57B, 153-178.
16. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
17. Le Pelley, M. E., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2001). Retrospective revaluation in humans: Learning or memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 311-352.
18. Lipp, O. V., & Dal Santo, L. (2002). Cue competition between elementary trained stimuli: US miscuing, interference, and US omission. Learning & Motivation, 33, 327-346.
19. Matute, H. (1996). Illusion of control: Detecting response-outcome independence in analytic but not in naturalistic conditions. Psychological Science, 7, 289-293.
20. Matute, H., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 182-196.
21. Matute, H., & Pineño, O. (1998). Stimulus competition in the absence of compound conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 3-14.
22. Matute, H., Vadillo, M. A., Vegas, S., & Blanco, F. (2007). The illusion of control in Internet users and college students. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10, 176-181.
23. Matute, H., Vegas, S., & De Marez, P. J. (2002). Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 714-725.
24. Ortega, N., & Matute, H. (2000). Interference between elementally trained stimuli can take place in one trial. Learning & Motivation, 31, 323-344.
25. Pineño, O., & Matute, H. (2000). Interference in human predictive learning when associations share a common element. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13, 16-33.
26. Shanks, D. R. (2007). Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 291-309.
27. Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Medin, D. L. (Eds.) (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal judgment. San Diego: Academic Press.
28. Vadillo, M. A., Bárcena, R., & Matute, H. (2006). The Internet as a research tool in the study of associative learning: An example from overshadowing. Behavioural Processes, 73, 36-40.
29. Vadillo, M. A., & Matute, H. (2007). Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 433-447.
30. Vadillo, M. A., Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (2005). Causal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency. Learning & Behavior, 33, 172-183.
31. Vadillo, M. A., Vegas, S., & Matute, H. (2004). The frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1065-1075.
32. Vandenbroucke, A. (1999, May). Blocking in the Martians preparation. Paper presented at the Cue Competition Meeting, Lignely, Belgium.
33. Vila, N. J., & Rosas, J. M. (2001). Reinstatement of acquisition performance by the presentation of the outcome after extinction in causality judgment. Behavioural Processes, 56, 147-154.
34. Waldmann, M. R. (2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 600-608.
35. Wasserman, E. A. (1990). Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 1, 298-302.