He's like ‘Do it now!’ and I'm like ‘No!’

English Today

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 24-32

  Levey, Stephen ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248709663     PISSN: 02660784     EISSN: 14740567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266078403001032     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersen, G. 1997. ‘“They like wanna see like how we talk and all that”: The use of like as a discourse marker in London teenage speech.’ In M.Ljung, ed., Papers from the 17th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, ICAME 17, pp. 37–48.
2. Andersen, G. 1998. ‘The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective.’ In A. Jucker and Y. Ziv, eds., Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pp. 147–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Andersen, G. 2000. ‘The role of the pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretation.’ In G. Andersen and T. Fretheim, eds., Pragmatic markers and Propositional Attitude, pp. 17–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Besnier, N. 1993. ‘Reported speech and affect in Nukulaelae Atoll.’ In J. Hill and J. Irvine, eds., Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, pp. 161–181. Cambridge: University Press.
5. Britain, D. 1998. ‘High rising terminals in New Zealand English: Who uses them, when and why?’ Essex research reports in Linguistics 21: 33–56.
6. Buchstaller, I. 2001. ‘An alternative view of LIKE: its grammaticalisation in conversational American English and beyond.’ In Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 11, pp. 21–41.
7. Cheshire, J., & A. Williams. 2002. ‘Information structure in male and female adolescent talk.’ In Journal of English Linguistics 30, pp. 217–238.
8. Coates, J. 1987. ‘Epistemic modality and spoken discourse.’ In Transactions of the Philological Society 85, pp. 110–31.
9. Cukor-Avila, P. 2002. ‘She say, she go, she be like: Verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English.’ In American Speech 77 (1), pp. 3–30.
10. Dailey-O'Cain, J. 2000. ‘The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like.’ In Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, pp. 60–80.
11. Dines, E. 1980. ‘Variation in discourse - and stuff like that.’ In Language in Society 9, pp. 13–31.
12. Eckert, P. 1997. ‘Gender, race and class in the preadolescent marketplace of identities.’ A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington DC.
13. Fleischman, S., & M. Yaguello. 1999. ‘Discourse markers in comparative perspective: A.contribution to cross-language pragmatics.’ Paper presented at the PRAGMA conference, Tel Aviv University, Israel, June 13–16.
14. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Haiman, J. 1988. ‘Incorporation, parallelism and focus.’ In M, Hammond, E, Moravcsik and J.R. Wirth, eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 303–320.
16. Haiman, J. 1994. ‘Life, the universe, and human language: A brief synopsis.’ In Language Sciences 15, pp. 293–322.
17. Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: University Press.
18. Holmes, J. 1986. ‘Functions of you know in women's and men's speech.’ In Language in Society 15, pp. 1–21.
19. Holmes, J. 1990. ‘Politeness strategies in New Zealand women's speech.’ In A. Bell and J. Holmes, eds., New Zealand ways of speaking English, pp. 252–275. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
20. Hopper, P. 1991. ‘On some principles of grammaticalization.’ In E. Traugott & B. Heine, eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization, pp. 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Kotsinas, U-B. 1994. Ungdomsspråk. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.
22. Labov, W. 1970. ‘The study of language in its social context.’ In Studium Generale 23, pp. 30–87.
23. Labov, W. 1984. ‘Field methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation.’ In J. Baugh and J. Scherzer, eds., Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall, pp. 28–53.
24. Maschler, Y. 2001. ‘Veke'ilu haraglayím sh'xa nitka'ot bifním kaze (’and like your feet get stuck inside like’): Hebrew kaze (‘like’), ke'ilu (‘like’), and the decline of Israeli dugri (‘direct’) speech.’ In Discourse Studies 3, pp. 295–326.
25. Maschler, Y. 2002a. ‘On the grammaticalization of ke’ ilu ‘like’, lit. ‘as if’, in Hebrew talk-in-interaction.’ In Language in Society 31, pp. 243–276.
26. Maschler, Y. 2002b. ‘The role of discourse markers in the construction of multivocality in Israeli Hebrew talk in interaction.’ In Research on Language and Social Interaction 35, pp.1–38.
27. Meyerhoff, M., & Niedzielski, N. 1998. ‘The syntax and semantics of olsem in Bislama.’ In M. Pearson, ed., Recent Papers in Austronesian linguistics (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20), pp. 235–243.
28. McCarthy, M.J., & R. A. Carter. 1997. ‘Grammar, tails and affect: Constructing expressive choices in discourse.’ In Text 17, pp. 405–429
29. Miller, J., & R. Weinert. 1995. ‘The function of LIKE in spoken language.’ In the Journal of Pragmatics 23, pp. 365–393.
30. Miller, J., & R. Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Nordberg, B. 1984. ‘Om ungdomars samstalsstil. Några preliminara iakttagelser.’ In Nysvenska Studier 64, pp. 5–27.
32. Overstreet, M. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: University Press.
33. Overstreet, M., & G. Yule. 1997. ‘On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English’ In the Journal of English Linguistics 25, pp. 250–258.
34. Romaine, S. 1999. Communicating Gender. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Romaine, S., & D. Lange. 1991. ‘The use of Like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress.’ In American Speech 66, pp. 227–279.
36. Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: University Press.
37. Scherre, M.M.P.S., & A. J. Naro. 1992. ‘The serial effect on internal and external variables.’ In Variation and Change 4(1): 1–14.
38. Schourup, L.C. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
39. Tagliamonte, S., & R. Hudson.1999. ‘Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system. In ‘British and Canadian youth.’ In Journal of Sociolinguistics 3 (2), pp. 147–72.
40. Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: University Press.
41. Traugott, E. 1995. ‘Subjectification in grammaticalization.’ In S. Wright & D. Stein, eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, pp. 31–54. Cambridge: University Press.
42. Underhill, R. 1988. ‘Like is Like Focus.’ In American Speech 63, pp. 234–46.
43. Winter, J. 2002. ‘Discourse Quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents Performing Voices.’ In Australian Journal of Linguistics 22, pp. 5–21.
44. Wouk, F. 1998. ‘Solidarity in Indonesian conversation: The discourse marker kan.’ In Multilingua 17 (4): 379–406.