Pedagogy, purpose, and the second language learner in on-line communities

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 137-160

  Potts, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248692165     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.62.1.137     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Angeli, C., Bonk, C.J., & Hará, N. (1998). Content analysis of on-line discussion in an applied educational psyclwlogy course (Center for Research on Learning and Technology Technical Report No. 2-98). Bloomington: Indiana University.
2. Baym, N.K. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. In S.G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 35-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 68-99. Retrieved February 21,2004, from http://llt.msu/edu/v017num3/belz/
4. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2001). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 9-48.
5. Bonk, C.J., & King, K.S. (1998). Computer conferencing and collaborative writing tools: Starting a dialogue about student dialogue. In C J. Bonk & K.S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 2-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40-57.
7. Carey, S. (1999a). The use of WebCT for a highly interactive virtual graduate seminar. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 12, 371-380.
8. Carey, S. (1999b). Opening our minds to highly interactive ESL acquisition on the Internet. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English teaching (pp. 15-24). Taipei: Crane Publishing.
9. Cole, M. (1990). Cognitive development and formal schooling: The evidence from cross-cultural research. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications from sociohistorical psychology (pp. 89-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1999). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. In G. DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organization form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 415-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Coughlin, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173-191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Cummins, J. (2000). Academic language learning, transformative pedagogy and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 537-547.
13. Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.
14. De Guerrero, M.C.M., & Villamil, O. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 78, 484-496.
15. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Donato, R., & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78, 453-464
17. Ferris, D. (1998). Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 289-318.
18. Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M.M., & Robins, J. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1), 1-26. Retrieved October 23, 2000, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/v016/issuel/ haythornthwaite.html
20. John-Steiner, V.P., & Meehan, T.M. (2000). Creativity and collaboration. In C.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literary research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 31-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Jones, S. G. (1997) The Internet and its social landscape. In S.G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 7-35). Salt Lake City, UT: Sage.
22. Kamhi-Stein, L.D. (2000). Looking to the future of TESOL teacher education: Web-based bulletin board discussions in a methods course. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 423-455.
23. Kang, E. (1998). The use of computer-mediated communication: Electronic collaboration and interactivity. In C. J. Bonk & K.S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse (pp. 313-337). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching. New York: Routledge.
25. Lantolf, J.P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Lantolf, J.P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M.P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). Harlow, UK: Longman.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lee, C.D., & Smagorinsky, P. (2000). Introduction: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. In C.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literary research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved February 21,2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/ v018num1/lee/default.html
30. Leki, I. (2001). 'A narrow thinking system': Nonnative-English speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 39-68.
31. Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279-310.
32. Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.
33. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-322.
34. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1998). Interactivity on the nets. In F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, & S. Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet (pp. 173-190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Thorne, S. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: Heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. In S. Herring & T. Erickson (Eds.), Tlie proceedings of the Thirty-Third Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. New York: IEEE Press.
37. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved February 10, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/v017num2/thorne/
38. Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 155-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Veerman, A.L., Andriessen, J.E.B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers and Education, 34, 269-290. Retrieved April 1, 2001, from http://oxford.elsevier.com
41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Warschauer, M. (2000a). The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 511-535.
43. Warschauer, M. (2000b). On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Kern & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Networked-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual networks as communities. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities and cyberspace (pp. 167-194). New York: Routledge.
45. Wertsch, J.V. (1990). The voice of rationality. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 111-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.