Students' views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 289-316

  Ferris, Dana ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748401191     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587585     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1990). Teaching suprasegmentals to international teaching assistants using field-specific materials. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 195-214.
2. Bailey, K. M. (1984). The foreign TA problem. In K. M. Bailey, F. Pialorsi, & J. Zukowski/Faust (Eds.), Foreign teaching assistants in U.S. universities (pp. 3-15). Washington, DC: National Association for Foreign Student Affairs.
3. Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723-738.
4. Bridgeman, B., & Carlson, S. B. (1984). Survey of academic writing tasks. Written Communication, 1, 247-280.
5. Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 146-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996a). Academic listening/speaking tasks for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 297-320.
7. Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996b). Academic oral communication needs of EAP learners: What subject-matter instructors actually require. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 31-58.
8. Flowerdew, J. (Ed.). (1995). Academic listening: Research perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Horowitz, D. M. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445-461.
10. Johns, A. M. (1981). Necessary English: A faculty survey. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 51-57.
11. Johns, A. M. (1991). English for specific purposes (ESP): Its history and contributions. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 67-75). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
12. King, P. (1995). Visual and verbal messages in the engineering lecture: Notetaking by postgraduate L2 students. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 219-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kroll, B. (1979). A survey of the writing needs of foreign and American college freshmen. English Language Teaching Journal, 33, 219-227.
14. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly 28, 81-101.
15. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). "Completely different worlds": EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 39-69.
16. Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
17. Lynch, T. (1995). The development of interactive listening strategies in second language academic settings. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of academic listening (pp. 166-185). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
18. Mason, A. (1995). By dint of: Student and lecturer perceptions of lecture comprehension strategies in first-term graduate study. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 199-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mendelsohn, D. J., & Rubin, J. (Eds.). (1995). A guide for the teaching of academic listening. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
20. Ostler, S. E. (1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 489-502.
21. Rounds, P. L. (1987). Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 643-671.
22. Spack, R. (1994). Blair resources for teaching writing: English as a second language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. SPSS for Windows (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. (1994). Chicago: SPSS.
24. Williams, J. (1992). Planning, discourse marking, and the comprehensibility of international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 643-671.