French interlanguage oral corpora: Recent developments

Journal of French Language Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 343-356

  Rule, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248691167     PISSN: 09592695     EISSN: 14740079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0959269504001838     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bartning, I. (1997a). L'apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d'une langue étrangerè. Tour d'horizon et esquisse d'une caractérisation de la variété avancée. AILE, 9: 9–50.
2. Bartning, I. (1997b). Structuration des énoncés et stratégies référentielles en c'est X chez des apprenants avancés et des locuteurs natifs. Travaux de linguistique, 34: 65–90.
3. Bartning, I. (1998). Procédés de grammaticalisation dans l'acquisition des prédications verbales en français parlé. Travaux de linguistique, 36: 223–234.
4. Bartning, I. (1999). Stratégies d'acquisition dans l'emploi du genre et de l'accord adjectival en français parlé. In: M. Plénat, M. Aurnague, A. Condamines, J.-P. Maurel, Ch. Molinier, and C. Muller, L'emprise du sens. Structures linguistiques et interprétations. Mélanges de syntaxe et de sémantique offerts à Andrée Borillo par un groupe d'amis, de collègues et de disciples. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi, pp. 45–60.
5. Bartning, I. (2000). Gender agreement in L2 French - preadvanced vs advanced learners. Studia Linguistica, 54: 225–237.
6. Bartning, I. (2002). La variété avancée et sa place dans les phases acquisitionnelles d'une langue étrangère. In: I. Bartning, J. Falk, L. Fant, M. Forsgren, R. M. Jacobsson, and J. Nystedt, Mélanges publiés en hommage à Gunnel Engwall. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Romanica Stockholmiensia 20. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
7. Bartning, I., Kihlstedt, M. and Kirchmeyer, N. (1997). ms. Principes de transcription du corpus oral InterFra. Stockholm University.
8. Brodda, B. (1996). Do corpus work with PC Beta and be your own computational linguist. Linguistic Department. Stockholm University.
9. Chambers, F. and Richards, B. (1995). The ‘free conversation’ and the assessment of oral proficiency. Language Learning, 11: 6–10.
10. Debrock, M. and Flament-Boistrancourt, D. (1996). Le corpus Lancom: bilan et perspectives. I.T.L. Review of Applied Linguistics, 111–112: 1–36.
11. Debrock, M., Flament-Boistrancourt, D. and Gevaert, R. (1999). Le manque de naturel des interactions verbales du non-francophone en français: analyse de quelques aspects à partir du corpus Lancom. Faits de langues, 13: 46–56.
12. Flament-Boistrancourt, D. and Cornette, G. (1999). Bon français ou vrai français? Une étude de l'acte de question menée à partir d'un extrait du corpus Lancom: les scènes dites du baby-sitting. Travaux de linguistique, 38: 119–153.
13. Flament-Boistrancourt, D. (2001). Pragmatique et approche communicative: la contribution du corpus Lancom. In: S. Bouquet (ed.) Le français dans le monde recherches et applications, numéro spécial: 143–170.
14. Hawkins, R. (1998). Explaining the difficulty of French gender attribution for speakers of English, paper presented at EUROSLA 8, Paris.
15. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: a generative introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Hawkins, R., Towell, R. and Bazergui, N. (1993). Universal grammar and the acquisition of French verb movement by native speakers of English. Second Language Research, 9.3: 189–233.
17. Housen, A. (2002). A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In: S. Granger, J. Hung and S. Petch-Tyson (eds), Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Jagtman, M. and Bongaerts, T. (1994). Report - COMOLA: a computer system for the anlysis of interlanguage data. Second Language Research, 10.1: 49–83.
19. Kihlstedt, M. (1998). La référence au passé dans le dialogue. Étude de l'acquisition de la temporalité chez des apprenants dits avancés de français. Cahiers de la recherche, 6. Dissertation. Stockholm University.
20. MacWhinney, B. 2002. http://cnts.uia.ac.be/childes/.
21. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Volume 1: Transcription format and programs. Volume 2: The database. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Malvern, D. and Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19.1: 85–104.
23. Marsden, E., Myles, F., Rule, S. and Mitchell, R. (2003). Using CHILDES tools for researching second language acquisition. In: S. Sarangi and T. van Leeuwen (eds), Applied linguistics & communities of practice. British studies in applied linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 98–113.
24. Mitchell, R. (2003). Scaffolding and microgenesis in classroom learner French: a corpus based study. Paper presented at the EUROSLA annual conference, Edinburgh, September 2003.
25. Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. (2003). Rote learned chunks and interlanguage development. Paper presented at AAAL Annual Conference, Washington, March 2003.
26. Mitchell, R. and Dickson, P. (1997). Progression in foreign language learning, Centre for Language in Education Occasional Papers No. 45. University of Southampton.
27. Myles, F. (2002). End of Award Report: Linguistic development in classroom learners of French. ESRC award ref no R000223421. University of Southampton.
28. Myles, F. (2003). The early development of L2 narratives: a longitudinal study. Marges Linguistiques, 5: 40–55.
29. Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory: the over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. In: R. Towell and R. Hawkins (eds), Empirical evidence and theories of representation in current research in Second Language Acquisition. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102.2: 139–168.
30. Myles, F. (in press). The emergence of morpho-syntactic structure in French L2. In: J.-M. Dewaele (ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: multidisciplinary approaches. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
31. Myles, F., Hooper, J. and Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48.3: 323–363.
32. Myles, F., Mitchell, R. and Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21.1: 49–80.
33. Paradis, J., Le Corre, M. and Genesee, F. (1998). The emergence of tense and agreement in child L2 French, Second Language Research, 14.3: 227–257.
34. Pienemann, M. (1992). COALA - A computational system for interlanguage analysis. Second Language Research, 8.1: 59–92.
35. Rule, S. (2003), The acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in early grammars of L2 French. Paper presented at AFLS annual conference, Tours, France, September 2003.
36. Rule, S., Marsden, E. and Myles, F. (2002). The acquisition of negatives in the French L2 classroom. Paper presented at EUROSLA Conference, Basel, Switzerland, September 2002.
37. Rutherford, W. and Thomas, M. (2001). The child language data exchange system in research on second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17.2: 195–212.
38. Towell, R., Hawkins, R. and Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 1711: 84–119.