Intergenerational connections through book discussion groups

Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-34

  Lohman, Helene ^a   Griffiths, Yolanda ^a   Coppard, Brenda M ^a  

^a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Book discussion group; Intergenerational programming; Relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248605650     PISSN: 15350770     EISSN: 15350932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J194v03n01_03     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adelman, M D, Hainer, J, Butler, R N, and Chalmers, M. 1998. A well elderly program:An intergenerational model in medical education. The Gerontologist, 28:409–413.
2. Archstone Foundation. 1999. Bridging the age gap:Promoting mutual health benefits for the young and old through intergenerational community programs, Long Beach, California:Author. Retrieved from http://www.archstone.org/publications2292/publications_show.htm?doc_id=33395http://www.archstone.org/publications2292/ on February 4, 2003.
3. Dychtwald, K. 1990. Age wave:The challenges and opportunities of an aging America, New York:Bantam.
4. Dychtwald, K. 1999. Age power:How the 21st century will be ruled by the new old, New York:Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
5. Fogler, J. 1989. An intergenerational women's group. The Gerontologist, 29:268–271.
6. Goldstein, H, Vasquez, V, Runyon, C, Lohman, M, and Gabriel, L. 1991. Intergenerational experiences for occupational therapy students. Journal of Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 10(2):17–30.
7. Hawes, C, Phillips and Rose, C DM. 2001. “Assisted living:A new model of supportive housing with long-term care services”. In The encyclopedia of aging:A comprehensive resource in gerontology and geriatrics, 3rd Ed., Edited by:Atchley, R C. Vol 1, New York:Springer.
8. Lapp, C A. 1991. Nursing students and the elderly:enhancing intergenerational communication through human-animal interaction. Holistic Nurse Practitioner, 5:72–79.
9. Lohman, H, Griffiths, Y, Coppard, B M, and Cota, L. 2003. The power of book discussion groups in intergenerational learning. Educational Gerontology, 29:1–13.
10. McGuire, F A, and Hawkins, M O. 1998. Introduction to intergenerational programs. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 23:1–9.
11. Nichols, A H, and Monard, K. 2001. Designing intergenerational service-learning courses based on student characteristics. Educational Gerontology, 27:37–48.
12. Pine, P P. 1997. Learning by sharing:An intergenerational college course. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28:93–102.
13. Sheehy, G. 1995. New passages, New York:Ballantine Books.
14. Sholley, B K. 1986. Value of book discussions in a psychology of women course. Teaching of Psychology, 13(3):151–153.
15. Thau, R D, and Heflin, J S. 1997. Generations apart:Xers vs. boomers vs. the elderly, Amherst, NY:Prometheus Books.
16. Unger, R K. 1982. Advocacy versus scholarship revisited:Issues in the psychology of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7:5–17.