Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elderly cochlear implant users

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 254-262

  Pedley, Karen ^a,d,f   Psarros, Colleen ^a,b,c   Gardner Berry, Kirsty ^a,c   Parker, Alison ^a,b,c   Purdy, Suzanne C ^a,e   Dawson, Pam ^a,b   Plant, Kerrie ^a,b  

^a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

^b Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^c Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre   (Australia)

^d Queensland Cochlear Implant Centre   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^f Mater Private Hospital Brisbane   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Elderly; Electrically evoked compound action potentials; MAPping; Neural response telemetry; NRT; Questionnaire; Speech perception; T and C levels

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NOISE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BEHAVIOR; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NOISE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34248592386     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020601014979     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbas, P., Brown, C.J., Shallop, J.K., First, J.B., Hughes, M.L., et al. 1999. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1998. Population Projections 1997 to 2051, ABS Catalogue No. 3222.0, Canberra.
3. Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A sentence test of speech perception: Reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning. In: City University of NY Internal Report #RCI10: Rehabilitation of cochlear implantees. New York: City University of New York.
4. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J. & Borland, J. 1996. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 453-467.
5. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J. & Gantz, B.J. 1998. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 19, 320-327.
6. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear, 21, 151-163.
7. Buchman, C.A., Fucci, M.J. & Luxford, W.M. 1999. Cochlear implants in the geriatric population: Benefits outweigh risks. Ear Nose Throat J, 78, 489-494.
8. Cafarelli Dees, D., Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., von Wallenberg, E., van Dijk, B., et al. 2005. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements. Using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant System. Audiol Neurotol, 10, 105-116.
9. Craddock, L., Cooper, H., van De Heyning, P., Vermeire, K., Davies, M., et al. 2003. Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates: A multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants International, 44, 161-170.
10. Facer, G.W., Peterson, A.M. & Brey, R.H. 1995. Cochlear implantation in the senior citizen age group using the Nucleus 22-channel device. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 166, 187-190.
11. Francis, H.W., Chee, N., Yeagle, J., Cheng, A. & Niparko, J.K. 2002. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope, 112, 1482-1488.
12. Franck, K.H. & Norton, S.J. 2001. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear, 22, 289-299.
13. Hooker K. & Shifren K. 1995. Psychological aspects of aging. In: Communication in Later Life. Huntley R.A. & Helfer K.S. (eds.) Boston, Buterworth-Heinemann.
14. Horn, K.L., McMahon, N.B., McMahon, D.C., Lewis, J.S., Barker, M., et al. 1991. Functional use of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant in the elderly. Laryngoscope, 101, 284-288.
15. Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A.A. & Gervais, J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear Hear, 21, 164-174.
16. th International Cochlear Implant Conference. Manchester, UK September 2002.
17. Jerger, J., Jerger, S., Oliver, T. & Pirozzolo, F. 1989. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear, 10, 79-89.
18. Kelsall, D.C., Shallop, J.K. & Burnelli, T. 1995. Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol, 16, 609-15.
19. rd 2000. Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 123, 419-424.
20. Orabi, A.A. & Al-Zoubi, F. 2003 Cochlear implants international, 4, 55-56.
21. Peterson, G. & Lehiste, I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord, 27, 62-70.
22. Pedley K., Tari S. & Drinkwater T. 2003. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Cochlear Limited Sydney, N30037. ISSI.
23. Pichora-Fuller, M.K. 2003. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl 2), S26-32.
24. Plant, K., Law, M., Whitford, L., Knight, M., Tari, S., et al. 2005. Evaluation of streamlined programming procedures for the Nucleus cochlear implant with the Contour electrode array. Ear Hear, 26, 651-668.
25. Psarros, C.E., Plant, K.L., Lee, K., Decker, J.A., Whitford, L.A., et al. 2002. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE Strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear Hear, 23, 18S-27S.
26. Rabbitt, P., Diggle, P., Smith, D., Holland, F. & McInnes, L. 2001. Identifying and separating the effects of practice and of cognitive aging during a large longitudinal study of elderly community residents. Neuropsychologia, 39, 532-543.
27. Seyle, K. & Brown, C.J. 2002. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear, 23, 72S-79S.
28. Waltzman, S.B., Cohen, N.L. & Shapiro, W.H. 1993. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 108, 329-333.
29. th International Cochlear Implant Conference. Manchester, UK September 2002.