Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates- A multicentre investigation

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 161-170

  Craddock, Louise C ^a   Cooper, H ^a   Van de Heyning, P ^b   Vermeire, K ^b   Davies, M ^c   Patel, J ^c   Cullington, H ^d,e   Ricaud, R ^d   Brunelli, T ^f   Knight, M ^g,h   Plant, K ^h,i   Cafarelli Dees, D ^j   Murray, B ⁱ  

^a Midlands Adult Cochlear Implant Prog   (United Kingdom)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c National Audiology Centre   (New Zealand)

^d S England Cochlear Implant Centre   (United Kingdom)

^e HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f Rocky Mountain Cochlear Implant Ctr   (United States)

^g University of Melbourne   (Australia)

^h BIONIC EAR INSTITUTE   (Australia)

ⁱ Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^j Cochlear Europe Ltd ^*  (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Neural Response Telemetry (NRT); Prediction of MAP levels; Speech discrimination

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTICENTER STUDY; NERVE POTENTIAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TELEMETRY;

EID: 10744223177     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cii.78     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Staller SJ (1999) Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing 20: 45-59.
2. Bresnihan M, Norman G, Scott F, Viani L (2001) Measurement of comfort levels by means of electrical stapedial reflex in children. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 127(8): 963-966.
3. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B (1990) Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(3): 1385-1391.
4. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J (2000) The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and the level used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing 21: 151-163.
5. Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK et al. (2001) Normative ECAP findings with the Nucleus neural response telemetry system in adults. Paper presented at the 2nd International Symposium and Workshop on Objective Measures in Cochlear Implantation, Lyon, France.
6. Dillier N, Lai WK, Almquist B, Frohne C, Müller-Deile J, Stecker M, von Wallenberg E (2002) Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) via a neural response telemetry (NRT) system. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 111: 407-414.
7. Skinner MW, Holden, LK, Holden TA (1997) Parameter selection to optimize speech recognition with the Nucleus implant. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 117:188-195.
8. Spivak LG, Chute PM (1994) The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing 15(2): 184-192.
9. Zehnder A, Allum JH, Honegger F, Probst R (1999) The usefulness of intraoperatively registered, electrically evoked stapedius reflex for the programming of cochlear implants in children. HNO 47(11): 970-975.