A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 820-840

  Perrinjaquet, Amandine ^a   Furrer, Olivier ^b   Usunier, Jean Claude ^a   Cestre, Ghislaine ^a   Valette Florence, Pierre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Circumplex structure; Constrained confirmatory factor analysis; Human values; Multicollinearity; Psychometry; Schwartz value system

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248589105     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Acton G.S., and Revelle W. Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment 79 3 (2002) 456-481
2. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika 49 2 (1984) 155-173
3. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 3 (1988) 411-423
4. Arbuckle J.L., and Wothke W. Amos 4.0 user's guide (1999), SmallWaters, Chicago
5. Bagozzi R.P., and Edwards J.R. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 1 1 (1998) 45-87
6. Bagozzi R.P., and Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 1 (1988) 74-94
7. Bardi A., and Schwartz S.H. Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 10 (2003) 1207-1220
8. Belsley D.A. Conditioning diagnostics: collinearity and weak data in regression (1991), Wiley, New York
9. Belsley D.A., Kuh E., and Welsch R.E. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity (1980), Wiley, New York
10. Ben Slimane, L., El Akremi, A., & Touzani, M. (2002). Les domaines motivationnels de l'inventaire des valeurs de Schwartz: Une analyse confirmatoire. Deuxièmes Journées de la Recherche en Sciences de Gestion, February.
11. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107 2 (1990) 238-246
12. Bentler P.M., and Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 3 (1980) 588-606
13. Borg I., and Lingoes J.C. Multidimensional similarity structure analysis (1987), Springer-Verlag, New York
14. Bouckenooghe D., Buelens M., Fontaine J., and Vanderheyden L. The prediction of stress by values and value conflict. Journal of Psychology 139 4 (2005) 369-382
15. Breivik E., and Olsson U.H. Adding variables to improve fit: the effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. In: Cudeck R., du Toit S., and Sörbom D. (Eds). Structural equation modeling: Present and future (2001), SSI-Scientific Software International, Lincolnhood (IL) 169-194
16. Browne M.W. Circumplex models for correlation matrices. Psychometrika 57 4 (1992) 469-497
17. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research 21 2 (1992) 230-258
18. Browne M.W., and Shapiro A. Robustness of normal theory methods in the analysis of linear latent variate models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 41 2 (1988) 193-208
19. Brunsø K., Scholderer J., and Grunert K.G. Testing relationships between values and food-related lifestyle: results from two European countries. Appetite 43 2 (2004) 195-205
20. Burroughs J.E., and Rindfleisch A. Materialism and well-being: a conflicting value perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 29 3 (2002) 348-370
21. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application, and programming (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J
22. Cable D.M., and Edwards J.R. Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 5 (2004) 822-834
23. Carmines E.G., and McIver J.P. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. In: Bohrnstedt G.W., and Borgatta E.F. (Eds). Social measurement: Current issues (1981), Sage, Beverly Hills 65-115
24. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16 September (1951) 297-334
25. Cronbach L.J., and Meehl P.E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52 4 (1955) 281-302
26. Davison M.L. Multidimensional scaling (1983), John Wiley and Sons, New York
27. Egri C.P., and Ralston D.A. Generation cohorts and personal values: a comparison of China and the United States. Organization Science 15 2 (2004) 210-220
28. Ekkekakis P., Hall E.E., and Petruzzello S.J. Evaluation of the circumplex structure of the activation deactivation adjective check list before and after a short walk. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 6 1 (2005) 83-101
29. Fabrigar L.R., Visser P.S., and Browne M.W. Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1 3 (1997) 184-203
30. Fan X., Thompson B., and Wang L. Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling 6 1 (1999) 56-83
31. Feather N.T. Values, valences, and choice: the influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 July (1995) 1135-1151
32. Feldman Barrett L., and Russell J.A. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 4 (1998) 967-984
33. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 February (1981) 39-50
34. Fornell C., and Yi Y. Assumptions of the two-step approach to latent variable modeling. Sociological Methods and Research 20 3 (1992) 291-320
35. Gaines Jr. S., Panter A.T., Lyde M.D., Steers W.N., Rusbult C.E., Cox C.L., et al. Evaluating the circumplexity of interpersonal traits and the manifestation of interpersonal traits in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 3 (1997) 610-623
36. Grewal R., Cote J.A., and Baumgartner H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing. Marketing Science 23 4 (2004) 519-529
37. Grunert S.C., and Juhl H.J. Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology 16 1 (1995) 39-62
38. Gurtman M.B. Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: the interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 1 (1992) 105-118
39. Gurtman M.B. Constructing personality tests to meet a structural criterion: application of the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality 61 2 (1993) 237-263
40. Gurtman M.B. The circumplex as a tool for studying normal and abnormal personality: a methodological primer. In: Strack S., and Lorr M. (Eds). Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (1994), Springer, New York 243-263
41. Gurtman M.B. Interpersonal complementarity: Integrating interpersonal measurement with interpersonal models. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48 1 (2001) 97-110
42. Gurtman M.B., and Pincus A.L. Interpersonal adjective scales: confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 3 (2000) 374-384
43. Guttman L.A. A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In: Lazarsfel P.F. (Ed). Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (1954), Free Press, Glencoe, IL 258-348
44. Hinkin T.R. A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management 21 5 (1995) 967-988
45. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model specification. Psychological Methods 3 4 (1998) 424-453
46. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 1 (1999) 1-55
47. Jagpal H.S. Multicollinearity in structural equation models unobservable variables. Journal of Marketing Research 19 November (1982) 431-439
48. Jöreskog K.G. Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika 36 2 (1971) 109-133
49. Jöreskog K.G. Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. In: Krantz D.H., Atkinson R.C., Luce R.D., and Suppes P. (Eds). Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology Vol. 2 (1974), S. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA 1-56
50. Jöreskog K.G. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika 43 4 (1978) 443-477
51. Jöreskog K.G., and Sörbom D. Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood (1986), Scientific Software, Mooresville, IN
52. Jöreskog K.G., and Sörbom D. LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. 2nd ed. (1989), SPSS, Chicago
53. Kenny D.A., and McCoach D.B. Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 10 3 (2003) 333-351
54. Kozan M.K., and Ergin C. The influence of intra-cultural value differences on conflict management practices. International Journal of Conflict Management 10 3 (1999) 249-267
55. Kruskal J.B. Multidimensional scaling by optimising goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29 March (1964) 1-27
56. Larsen R.J., and Diener E. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotions. In: Clark M.S. (Ed). Review of Personality and Social Psychology 13 (1992), Sage, Newbury Parck, CA 25-59
57. Lindeman M., and Verkasalo M. Measuring values with the short Schwartz's value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment 85 2 (2005) 170-178
58. Lingoes J.C. Geometric representations of relational data (1977), Mathesis, Ann Arbor, MI
59. Lingoes J.C. Testing regional hypotheses in multidimensional scaling. In: Borg I. (Ed). Multidimensional data representations: When and why (1981), Mathesis, Ann Arbor, MI 280-310
60. MacCallum R.C., and Austin J.T. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology 51 (2000) 201-226
61. Maiti S.S., and Mukherjee B.N. A note of distributional properties of the Jöreskog-Sörbom fit indices. Psychometrika 55 4 (1990) 721-726
62. Marsh H.W., Dowson M., Pietsch J., and Walker R. Why multicollinearity matters: a reexamination of relations between self-efficacy, self-concept, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 3 (2004) 518-522
63. Marsh H.W., Hau K.-T., and Wen Z. In search of the golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11 3 (2004) 230-341
64. McDonald R.P., and Ho M.-H.R. Principle and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods 7 1 (2002) 64-82
65. McQuitty S. Effects of employing ridge regression in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling 4 3 (1997) 244-252
66. Munson J.M., and McIntyre S.H. Developing practical procedures for the measurement of personal values in cross-cultural marketing. Journal of Marketing Research 16 February (1979) 48-52
67. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory. second ed. (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
68. Odin Y., Vinais J.Y., and Valette-Florence P. Analyse confirmatoire des domaines motivationnels de Schwartz : Une application au domaine des médias. Actes du Congrès de l'AFM, Université de Poitiers 12 (1996) 125-138
69. Oishi S., Schimmack U., Diener E., and Suh E.M. The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 11 (1998) 1177-1189
70. Olver J.M., and Mooradian T.A. Personality traits and personal values: a conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences 35 1 (2003) 109-125
71. Pincus A.L., Gurtman M.B., and Ruiz M.A. Structural analysis of social behavior (SASB): circumplex analyses and structural relations with the interpersonal circle and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 6 (1998) 1629-1645
72. Ping Jr. R.A. On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. Journal of Business Research 57 2 (2004) 125-141
73. Ralston D.A., Egri C.P., Stewart S., Terpstra R.H., and Yu K. Doing business in the 21st century with the new generation of Chinese managers: a study of generational shifts in work values in China. Journal of International Business Studies 30 2 (1999) 415-427
74. Remington N.A., Fabrigar L.R., and Visser P.S. Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 2 (2000) 286-300
75. Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R., and Wrightsman L.S. Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In: Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R., and Wrightsman L.S. (Eds). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (1991), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-16
76. Rokeach M. The nature of human values (1973), The Free Press, New York
77. Russell J.A., and Carroll J.M. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin 125 1 (1999) 3-30
78. Schiffman S.S., Reynolds M.L., and Young F.W. Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods and applications (1981), Academic Press, New York
79. Schultz P.W., Gouveia V.V., Cameron L.D., Tankha G., Schmuck P., and Franek M. Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36 4 (2005) 457-475
80. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zonna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology (1992), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-66
81. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of Social Issues 50 4 (1994) 19-45
82. Schwartz S.H., and Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 3 (1987) 550-562
83. Schwartz S.H., and Bilsky W. Toward a theory of the universal structure and content of values: extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 5 (1990) 878-891
84. Schwartz S.H., and Boehnke K. Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 38 3 (2004) 230-255
85. Schwartz S.H., Melech G., Lehmann A., Burgess S., Harris M., and Owens V. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 5 (2001) 519-542
86. Schwartz S.H., and Sagiv L. Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 26 January (1995) 92-116
87. Spini D. Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz value survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34 1 (2003) 3-23
88. Spini D., and Doise W. Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology 28 4 (1998) 603-622
89. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., and Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 25 1 (1998) 78-90
90. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., ter Hofstede F., and Wedel M. A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing 63 April (1999) 55-69
91. Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
92. Stern P., Dietz T., and Guagnano G. A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58 6 (1998) 984-1001
93. Strack S., Choca J.P., and Gurtman M.B. Circular structure of the MCMI-III personality disorder scales. Journal of Personality Disorders 15 3 (2001) 263-274
94. Thøgersen J., and Ölander F. Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: a panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 605-630
95. Tracey T.J.G. Analysis of circumplex models. In: Tinsley H.E.A., and Brown S.D. (Eds). Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 641-664
96. Tsai R.-C., and Böckenholt U. Two-level linear paired comparison models: estimation and identifiability issues. Mathematical Social Sciences 43 3 (2002) 429-449
97. Tucker L.R., and Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38 1 (1973) 1-10
98. Van den Broeck H., Vanderheyden K., and Cools E. Linking cognitive styles and values. Working paper series Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School (2003)
99. Wagner C.C., Kiesler D.J., and Schmidt J.A. Assessing the interpersonal transaction cycle: convergence of action and reaction interpersonal circumplex measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 5 (1995) 938-949
100. Wiggins J.S., Steiger J.H., and Gaelick L. Evaluating circumplexity in personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research 16 3 (1981) 263-289
101. Wilson M.S. A social-value analysis of postmaterialism. Journal of Social Psychology 145 2 (2005) 209-224
102. Wothke W. Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 256-293